Allegation In Paragraph 6.2

Defendant denies the allegation in Paragraph 6.2.
Complaint Paragraphs 7.0 through 7.10
Paragraph 7.0 contains a statement of the case to which no response is required. To the extent that this paragraph purports to contain factual allegations requiring a response, the Defendant denies all allegations.
The first sentence of Paragraph 7.1 contains a statement of the case, conclusory statements and arguments to which no response is required. To the extent that this paragraph purports to contain factual allegations requiring a response, Defendant denies the allegations. With regard to the second sentence of Paragraph 7.1, Defendant admits that it did not concede the December 2016 FIE was inappropriate and did not offer payment for the private evaluation prior to the special education due process hearing. With regard to the third and fourth sentences of Paragraph 7.1, Defendant denies that Plaintiff’s allegations.
Defendant denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 7.2.
With regard

Defendant denies that the facts alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint constitute a violation of the IDEA, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., the implementing regulations at 34 C.F.R. Chapter 300, and 19 Tex. Admin. Code Chapter 89. Defendant denies that Plaintiff is the prevailing party in the underlying administrative proceeding and denies that Plaintiff is entitled to reversal of portions of the Hearing Officer’s Decision. Defendant denies that Plaintiff is entitled to a declaration that D.H.H. is eligible for special education and related services. Defendant denies that Plaintiff is entitled to an order that Defendant creates an IEP for D.H.H. Defendant denies that Plaintiff is entitled to recover attorney fees, prejudgment interest, post-judgment interest or any and all other requested declaratory, equitable, or other