Psychopaths and diagnosis of the illness are among very limited resources which researchers for some time have described very subtly of the reality of these concerns; due to a universal dynamic stigma of Psychopaths. One reason for that is, Psychopaths are viewed widely as blood-lusted criminals which causes psychologists to conduct these tests to search for the answers to how they are rather than who they are. Despite continuous amounts of research, the concept still withholds this demonized motive towards that said person. There still lies ambiguity of this psychosis and the term Psychopaths is currently being renounced by researches as a “muted” area. As a result, Science and trials are considered the best way to measure this issue. Little do they share the broadness of that term and go into detail about the individuals who become an outlier of the assumed generalization. That being our so called serial killers, …show more content…
The paper that I used as background research, Meloy (1997) addresses the mutual relationship of sadomasochists with psychopathy: “In another study, sadomasochistic women appear to be more extroverted, less neurotic, more psychopathic, and more sexually active than control subjects.” and the conjecture of abnormal sexual behaviors among diagnosis of psychopathy that lead to violence: “Here the paths of sadism and psychopathy cross and our species' capacity for evil is most apparent. The majority of the subjects carefully planned their offense, took the bound, blindfolded, or gagged victim to a pre-selected location… all the subjects remained unemotional and detached during the torturing and murdering.” While the piece provided beneficial insight into my working, the paper studied more on facts of Sadism within Psychopaths and not influence my expectation of Sadomasochistic