870456162, 3610, Dr. Lovern, 9/25/2017, Paper six Katlyn Ford Valdosta State University Chapter one in American Indian Thought as Waters (2004) opens with the information that westerners in the world of philosophy is a common and prominent knowledge. What is not as traditionally expected, until recently, are the increasing numbers of people with Native American decent joining the prestigious community of intellectual thought. Waters continues to explain that even though Native American descendants are increasing their perspective of westerners is seen as lost in time or rather as primitive in thought. This impacts how these descendant philosophers are seen and taken seriously within the philosopher community (p.3). Waters (2004) explains …show more content…
Explaining the importance of the knowledge that can be offered by these logic courses and all that they have to offer to its students (p.72). Discussing how they cover personal stories of indigenous people in oral and written forms. She then elaborates on how these stories are what differentiates Native Americans from African Americans, European American, and Asian American (p.73). Further on in chapter seven Waters (2004) writes of how quick assumptions and over generalization is a direct step towards stereotyping. Although in this case, she means the stereotyping of Native Americans. She does extend this to other variables as well some of which include sex, gender, class, age or even disability. Waters confronts the issue that media the plays on these assumptions and generalizations (p.78). Waters (2004) primary objective of this chapter is to inform readers on the basic setup and stricter of classes that she teaches to help facilitate towards becoming Native-centric along with Euro-centric. She does this by explaining the methodology in her curriculum which helps provide the Native-centric insight. Nonetheless, she explains that she is doing this for more than Native Americans but also non-Native students as well