ipl-logo

An Analysis Of Peter Singer's Argument

447 Words2 Pages

Yes, I agree with Peter singers argument on duty to render aid to others to an extent because it is the right thing to do for example take the drowning child scenario into consideration. The importance of saving the life of the child far outweighs the risks it doesn't necessarily need to even be a child when you see someone in need of help and you are able to help you ought to help them. Also the booze cruise scenario when everybody is off drinking,partying, and having a good time upon asking for their help they say they're to busy drinking even though saving the lives of the 20 naval officers is what they ought to do because it outweighs drinking instead you ought to try and save as many lives as you can. The parts I don't agree with Singer are his fair share view which says that if others aren’t doing enough you are obligated to do more than your fair share and when he says give till it hurts at all times because it is required of you that is a bit extreme and necessarily isn't true because for example in the drowning child argument if you're unable to help perhaps because you're a paraplegic then it isn't required of you. …show more content…

You should help them to the point where they are no longer in the same situation that they perviously were in because instead of following Singers argument and giving more till it hurts you're not making a difference you're only putting yourself in that same position as that person which in turn doesn’t maximize utility at all. helping others is very rewarding., Helping others is a way of enabling that persons full potential so that later on they can help

Show More
Related
302 Words | 2 Pages

The Singer Solution to World Poverty” written by Peter Singer. In the essay that Peter Singer wrote has a main point which is to give solution to the world poverty and how to deal with with the situation to end it. The article narrates that the philosophy Peter Singer demonstrate about the world poverty.

Read More
1699 Words | 7 Pages

In Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” he argues the importance of donation to poor people, which could mean the difference between life and death for children in need. He gives an example for Bob, who has an opportunity to save a child’s life, but he could lose his worthy car. He makes a comparison between people who are capable to donate money to save children lives and people who have no chance to help or donate under certain situation such as Bob. He also encourages people who are in the middle class to donate at a minimum of 200$; furthermore, he thinks that people should donate more like 200.000$ when they consider the level of sacrifice that they would demand of Bob’s situation. He gives some estimates for the amount of donations that people should give to overseas.

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

According to the United Nations, a child dies of hunger every ten seconds. Likewise, millions of people live in poverty and do not know when they will eat again. While the typical American throws away leftover food, children are dying across the world from starvation. To put this into perspective: By the time you have started reading, a child has died of hunger. But who is to blame?

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Peter Singer argues that prosperous people should donate their excess money to the overseas aid groups. When saying this, he believes Americans should stop spending their money on luxuries such as a TV, a computer, a car, and videogames. Instead of spending money on items such as that, he thought we should start sending money to those who are starving in other countries and need our help. There are pros and cons to Singer’s argument and both can be greatly supported.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

So my issue with Peter Singer's argument is it's infallible to tell someone that they should not be spending money on luxuries, when they themselves are buying tickets to see a movie. I believe in "practice what you preach" and "actions speak louder than words". Which really puts me off about what Singer was trying to communicate. Now I understand his thoughts of trying to challenge people to not be selfish and think inwardly. But in that process, he himself fell prey to his own vices.

Read More
434 Words | 2 Pages

Rachel and J. Gay-WIlliams have opposing ethical positions regarding physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia. Rachel backs his ethical approval of euthanasia with two strong arguments. His first argument is the “Utilitarian version of the argument” (Rachels, RIght Thing To Do, 350). This basic claim is that “any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the world or to decrease the amount of misery” (Rachels, RTD, 350). Since those who would be euthanized would become relieved of their unpreventable and agonizing pain (i.e. misery) euthanasia would be morally right.

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

If you saw someone being abused would you help? Would you step in and try to save them? In the novel Stepping on the Cracks by Mary Downing Hahn Mrs.Baker is faced with these questions. She has to make the tough decision to interfere with someone's life and risk getting hurt, or risking the life of someone dear to her. I can't entirely agree with Mrs.Baker, I think that there is a time and place that people should help and interfere with someone's life.

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Money: the root of most social problems and one of the few matters that almost everyone has an opinion on. Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” a newspaper article, is no exception. Singer argues that one should donate all unnecessary money to the less fortunate because of the morality of the situation. However, though the goal is noble, his commentary is very ineffective due to its condescending tone, lack of hard facts, and overall extremism. The piece is written by Peter Singer, an Australian professor of bioethics at Princeton University.

Read More
3128 Words | 13 Pages

Philip Manning 12504697 Q) Evaluate Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. There can be no doubt that Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’ is unrealistic, unfair and not sustainable. Singer’s arguments are valid arguments but not sound. In order to get a clear and balanced view of my arguments which disprove the Singer article, it is first necessary to examine and lay out the main aspects of Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. My arguments against Singer’s claims shall then be detailed and examined in depth.

Read More
349 Words | 2 Pages

Republicans and Democrats think differently when it comes to forming a U.S. economic policy. On average, Republicans make tax cuts their highest priority, since they prefer the idea that reducing the role of the government in the economy will stimulate economic growth and promote investment. They also adopted the idea of supply-side economics and prefer regressive taxes, or a flat tax rate, that taxes all income at the same percentage regardless of earnings. Thus, Republicans justify that the policy encourages individuals to become creative investors and productive workers. Democrats on the other hand, favor higher levels of public spending, since they need taxes to fund government programs.

Read More
1959 Words | 8 Pages

Responding to Singer: On Individualism and Pragmatics Michael Anderson Soh Sheng Rong Matriculation number: U1731581B 22 September 2017 Words: 1917 This paper is written as a response to Singer’s “Famine, Affluence and Morality”. Singer poses what he deems a moral obligation to mankind. That is, we are not just responsible for our personal good and are instead obligated to intervene to rescue others from suffering if we possess the capability to do so.

Read More
368 Words | 2 Pages

This statement is something I wholeheartedly agree with and have seen throughout my life. One of the most recent examples of this is with Hurricane Harvey. Many people chose to go and rescue the people who were

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

The word “help” is a very complicated yet simple word. According to the Learner’s Dictionary, the definition of help is: to do something that makes it easier for someone to do a job, to deal with a problem, to aid or assist someone. Helping someone sounds like an easy job, and most of us would agree that we would help people anytime anywhere, but it always doesn’t turn out that way. Scientists have spent a considerable amount of time studying the helpfulness behavior of several types of people. Picture this... a man lying on the floor and a few people strolling about, occupied with their business.

Read More
2076 Words | 9 Pages

Animals Rights In society, animals are being killed for food, fur, and experiments. This raises the question is it ethical to kill other animals for our own person gain? As human, we live in a society where it is humane to kill other animals when it comes to survival, clothing and to help cure diseases. But this is not really answering the question why is this okay?

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

Then you do one thing and it makes them realize there is still good in the world. That is why I think it is amazing to help anyone you can no matter who they are.

Read More

More about An Analysis Of Peter Singer's Argument

Related Topics

Open Document