ipl-logo

An Unequitable Comparison By Phillis Wheatley

489 Words2 Pages

12.1.17
An Unequitable Comparison In Phillis Wheatley’s poem, “To the Right Honorable William, Earl of Dartmouth”, the speaker compares England’s control over America to the enslavement of foreigners in America to emphasize her nation’s lack of freedom during the revolution. In particular, the speaker pays attention to word choice to illuminate the correspondence between the two sides. To show the intentional choice of diction, the speaker references the deliberate “Tyranny” (18) that England exercises “t’enslave the land” (19). The speaker had the ability to choose any word to convey England’s power over America; However, her selection of “enslave” (19) displays her conscious decision to correlate human subjugation with hierarchy. Comparing …show more content…

The speaker hopes that one day, America will “No longer… dread thou iron chain” (16) exhibiting the restraining shackles that England has attached to America. Chains are commonly connected to slavery and the idea of not owning one’s own body. In this moment of vividly chaining America to England, the speaker equates England’s “wanton” (18) despotism with slavery. In doing so, just like slave owners, England’s “lawless hand” (18) takes control over America without mutual agreement. Furthermore, the speaker progresses this analogy by imploring, to Earl Dartmouth, if “Others may never feel tyrannic sway?” (31). As a slave, the speaker attempts to question tyranny by connecting it to slavery so that Earl Dartmouth will better understand the argument. Tyranny is known as oppressive rule over another thing or person. Although England’s taxation without representation is unfair, one human dominating another human for profit and labor is far more severe. Therefore, not only is the comparison transcendent, but it also forces the parallel between problems on a national level to problems on an individual level. Additionally, her collation could be viewed in conflicting

Show More
Related
524 Words | 3 Pages

Additionally, Henry asserts that “[they] have petitioned; [they] have remonstrated; [they] have supplicated; [they] have prostrated [themselves] before the throne” to “avert the storm” of the upcoming war. Henry’s appliance of anaphora with “we” at the beginning of subsequent clauses emphasizes that the colonists have done much to avoid any violent outcome with the British. He notes that the colonists are trying to resolve problems while Britain is only “produc[ing] additional violence and insult.” Hence, Henry underscores Britain’s neglect of possible solutions and their inclination for violence. In essence, Henry’s clever use of various rhetorical strategies persuades the colonies to achieve their freedom from Britain.

Read More
1241 Words | 5 Pages

In An Imperfect God, Henry Wiencek presents George Washington as a specific case through which to study what he calls the great “paradox” of American history: how a nation founded on the philosophies of liberty and equality also kept human beings in chains. Washington was a slave-owner his entire life and he took the role of managing the slaves who lived and worked at Mount Vernon including their purchase and sale. Prior to the Revolution, Washington “was just another striving young planter, blithely ordering breeding wenches for his slave trade, blithely exiling a man to a likely death at hard labor” (Wiencek 133) The fortune produced by Washington’s slaves kept him in the ranks of Virginia’s planter elite, securing the social and political prestige that helped lead the Second Continental Congress to appoint him commander-in-chief of the Continental Army in 1775.

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

Henry states, "Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston!" (Line 3, 4). This metaphor compares the chains to being under British rule. Metaphors stimulate the audience's imagination and emotional reactions to the topic.

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

Fitzhugh attempts to weave a dishonest and malicious narrative about the benefits of slavery and the negatives of freedom. He spouts logical fallacies that further show his lack of understanding and his weak argument base. How can a system of equality and liberty be less prosperous and beneficial than Fitzhugh’s system of dominance, control and subjugation? It cannot be. Through Fitzhugh's System people are kept in mental darkness and treated no better than cattle, and in most cases worse.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

The author begins by invalidating any rally for peace maintained by the loyalty of hereditary succession, saying “The whole history of England disowns the fact” (Paine 21), followed by evidence of the many civil wars fought by the English. By evaluating these facts, the reader is able to clearly see how hereditary succession does the opposite of its purpose: it establishes quarrels and thwarts peace. Paine also considers the belief that the British government is credited with American prosperity, and because of this, Great Britain will always be of necessity to America. Though Paine refutes this immediately comparing the belief to these absurd notions: “…because a child has thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat, or that the first twenty years of our lives is to become a precedent for the nest twenty” (Paine 25). Paine even disproves the necessity of reconciliation between the colonies and Great Britain with two major points.

Read More
1305 Words | 6 Pages

It’s been over 200 years since the original thirteen colonies of America fought their revolutionary war against Great Britain, in hopes of achieving their independence. We shall be going through a few areas of the Revolution, such as the military, social hierarchy, the role of men and women during the war, the colonists’ values of equality and their social contract response to the British government’s abuses, and we’ll compare these areas to the present day. The American Revolution started around April of 1775, when British redcoats and American militiamen exchanged gunshots in Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts. However, that was only the beginning of the fighting; the reasons for the war date from years prior, when resistance from the

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

Slave owners felt that it was their responsibility and duty to dominate the “less fortunate and the less

Read More
1642 Words | 7 Pages

From this, derives a bond with the reader that pushes their understanding of the evil nature of slavery that society deemed appropriate therefore enhancing their understanding of history. While only glossed over in most classroom settings of the twenty-first century, students often neglect the sad but true reality that the backbone of slavery, was the dehumanization of an entire race of people. To create a group of individuals known for their extreme oppression derived from slavery, required plantation owner’s of the South to constantly embedded certain values into the lives of their slaves. To talk back means to be whipped.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

Benjamin Banneker, the son of former slaves, wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson to argue against slavery. Banneker was an educated man, he was an astronomer, mathematician, surveyor, author, and farmer, yet, Jefferson had not known this information. Banneker makes his argument through the use of allusion, diction, and repetition, which causes Banneker to seem reliable and have intelligence. To remind Jefferson of his own subjugation, Banneker alludes to the British Crown. “..British Crown were exerted with every powerful effort in order to reduce you to a State of Servitude.”

Read More
412 Words | 2 Pages

Simply with precise words, one posses the power to create any voice they wish, whether that of sarcasm, encouragement or anguish, a voice that can portray any feeling, create any impression or change any atmosphere.   Never can a man wield so much power or influence within one simple tool.   William Wilberforce, an English politician, armed himself with such a weapon as he took the lead in the movement to finally abolish slave trade.   Within his famous abolition speech in 1789, Wilberforce constructed his voice to behave in such a way that it would become the indicator for the immense horror within his subject. Opening in modesty, beginning with sarcasm and ending with such a dismayed abomination, the audience cannot help but wonder how they

Read More
1006 Words | 5 Pages

Compare this

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

In the “Speech to the Virginia Convention” given by Patrick Henry to the President in 1775, asserts that the colonists should not be trying to negotiate with the British. His purpose was to convince the audience that they should not be trying to befriend the people of Great Britain rather that they should make Great Britain their foe. Henry uses his speech to appeal to both the President and the colonist through the use of figurative language, tone, and syntax. Patrick Henry’s use of diction, a persuasive and forceful tone, appeal to ethos and pathos, as well as various syntactical elements in his “Speech to the Virginia Convention” shows that the colonists should be fighting to break away from the British monarchy rather than negotiate terms to try and stay under their clutches.

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

who fiercely believed that the true God was a jealous God, ready to smite the indolent and rain fire on sin, a Lord whose affection was only earned through subservience. The door creaked open, “Good morning,” Mary said. “Is it?” William asked, nodding towards the names on the warning and probation list.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

During the writing of “The Declaration of Independence”, Thomas Jefferson go to great lengths to describe why the colonies were choosing to separate themselves from Great Britain. This is done not only so readers will have a detailed description of what the American people were facing while being ruled by the King. The vivid depiction of all the cruelty he has shown towards the people. Furthermore, the lengthy, highly descriptive examination of all the wrongs and showing that the colonists made many appeals to the King but also the people of Britain that the reader now feels as if it is wrong for the Colonies to be under Great Britain. Thomas Jefferson begins by detailing the ethical standings of all people that live within the colonies.

Read More
1429 Words | 6 Pages

And while Hobbes supports a monarch with substantial power, he too believes that “the duty of the sovereign [is] to see that ordinary citizens are not oppressed by the great” and that the sovereign does not “oppress them on the advice of the great” (The Leviathan, 155). For these philosophers, the abuse of power is another form of the same competition that drives humankind into societies; it transforms a society from a tool that allows individuals to support each other and avoid competition into a tool for one individual to exploit the competition of the weaker

Read More

More about An Unequitable Comparison By Phillis Wheatley

Related Topics

Open Document