For decades now, critics have had conflicting opinions on whether or not the work of Ayn Rand should be praised for its introduction of a new philosophy or criticized for its validation of bad elitist ways. Not only are there so many pages of information in her books, there are also countless interpretations that all contradict each other. These meanings have been brought together by how a character is seen by the author since the same traits in one character may seem evil, but good in another. Critics and politicians alike can wrap her novels to fit their own interpretations even though she has established a thick contrast. Characters who are deemed good or evil by Ayn Rand’s objectivism are separated by their values, but connected by the