Analysis Of At The Holocaust Museum By David Oliver Relin

442 Words2 Pages

The holocaust is an event that was lead by a man named hitler, he and his army killed 6 million jews. And the holocaust museum shows what the holocaust was about and everything that the prisoners went through. The article “At The Holocaust Museum” by David Oliver Relin, objectivity is factual and are facts, subjectivity is someone's opinion. Some fictional texts are more subjective meaning it shows more emotions and point of view. In the Article “At The Holocaust Museum” is both subjective and objective because they include people's perspectives on the holocaust and objective because its shows facts.

The topic in the article is presented in an objective way .One way that it was objective is it says charred corpse’s, the word choice in this phrase shows a tone of uneasy. It shows the tone of uneasy because it makes you see burned dead bodies. Its objective because it happened in the holocaust . The article also says “Stark brick and steel halls echo the look of the barracks and gas chambers”, the tone in this sentence shows a frightened or strange mood and this is objective because its saying the gas chambers are stark brick and steel halls. The last way …show more content…

A way that subjectivity is presented is it states in the text the phrase ”visibly shaken”. By the words in this phrase you can visualize someone in shock looking at all the things that happened in the holocaust. This shows subjectivity because of the person being shook and showing emotion. Another way that the article is subjective is because it says “sobs” . This shows subjectivity because it appeals to the emotion side and how sad people were at the holocaust museum. An the final way that the article is subjective is because in the article it says “nearly everyone finds the museum an emotional place to visit.” This shows subjectivity because it says almost everyone finds it an emotional place and subjectivity means emotions. The article shows subjectivity in these