Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of into the wild
Analysis essay based on into the wild
Analysis essay based on into the wild
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of into the wild
This book starts with the founding of Christopher McCandless’s body by a bunch of Alaskan hunters in a bus. The law enforcement then comes to remove his body. Jon Krakauer writes about this while writing for “Outside Magazine” and become very curious about this story. To find out more Krakauer pays a visit to a man named Wayne Westerberg, who says that he knew Christopher McCandless as “Alex McCandless” and he then gives a sketch of the young man’s character while in Carthage Wisconsin. He states that he used McCandless from time to time on his grain elevator and from his memories views him as participating, smart, and determined.
Krakauer was instead the author and detective for Into The Wild interviewing each person Chris had crossed paths with and left an impact. This long process gave Krakauer a new insight into why Chris had gone to Alaska. In the end ,although not living, Chris affected Krakauer by giving him a new outlook on the transcendentalist way of life and why it was so appealing to him. Krakauer felt closer to Chris than many of those that actually crossed his path. He had a similar experience when he was younger going out on his own and scaling the “Devils Thumb” in Alaska.
McCandless had some controversial ideals and flaws, but the lessons and inspiration he left behind cannot be denied. His unwavering commitment to his ideals is a testament to his inspiring mindset. The unique life he led serves as an inspiration to many but also as a reminder of the importance of considering the impact of one’s actions on others. Everyone can learn a great deal from McCandless’ life and should strive to live with a similar goal: To pursue a life with the freedom to be one’s true self. Works Cited Krakauer, Jon.
The type of life McCandless lived is shared by few and understood by even less, inviting negative judgment for his lack of conventional life. Krakauer, however, illustrates McCandless’s journey as a monumental change, “At long last he was unencumbered, emancipated from the stifling world of his parents and peers, a world of abstraction and security and material excess, a world in which he felt grievously cut off from the raw throb of existence" (Krakauer 22). The tone in which Krakauer displays McCandless’s reasoning invokes a sense of understanding as to who McCandless was as a person and the disposition he presented throughout his life. While the statement is neither negative or positive, the descriptive language used implies an undercurrent of joy and the thrill of adventure, all of which McCandless had expressed to others and mentioned in his personal journal. However, the wording can be considered flowery, supporting the claim that Krakauer glamorizes “…the poacher Chris McCandless…into some sort of poor, admirable romantic soul lost in the wilds of Alaska” (Medred 1).
“Into the Wild” – Persuasive Essay What is your thoughts about Chris McCandless? Was he brave, or was he just another foolish person? The book “Into the Wild” written by Jon Krakauer was a book describing the life and death of an adventurer known as Chris McCandless. The answer to the question I asked earlier is simple. McCandless is neither wise nor foolish, for he has both qualities.
Jon Krakauer has a high amount of respect for Christopher J. McCandless; not only because they have many similarities, but because McCandless searched deep for the meaning of life and did as he pleased. In the book, “Into The Wild,” Krakauer not only tells the story of McCandless, but also of his own life, and how he has been shaped into his own. Krakauer had a deep love for the wild, just as Chris did. Though, the two did not do the same things, they both pursued their passions which made it easier for Krakauer to relate to Chris. Once climbing a mountain, Krakauer had ran into trouble, just as Chris did on his journey.
While he was very good at the different sports and activities he participated in, strategy, nuance, and anything beyond that was of no concern to McCandless. The only way McCandless would attempt a challenge was “head-on, right now” and apply the “full brunt of his extraordinary energy.” (111) Krakauer shared common attributes similar with McCandless in his youth. Both “mistook passion for insight” and both ended up making “gap-ridden” choices. (155) However, both were driven by a similar goal; To have joy and happiness in life.
“Same story : idealistic, energetic young guys overestimated themselves, underestimated the country, and ended up in trouble. Only difference is, the story of his dumbassesness splashed across the media. “. This quote from chapter 8 perfectly sums up what Chris McCandless actually, not courageous adventure Krakauer presents him to be in his book “Into the wild”. Chris McCandless is a reckless narcissist whose own hubris got him killed in a ridiculous attempt to survive in the Alaskan wilderness. In his deplorable attempt to run away from his personal life, McCandless went without any basic survival gear or knowledge, and got himself killed.
McCandless sought to escape the constraints of modern society and live a life of complete freedom in the wilderness. Krakauer writes, "It was the last thing on earth he wanted -- to be held down or defined by the trappings of society" (Krakauer 6). However, despite his desire for freedom, McCandless also sought human connection and formed relationships with people he met on his journey. He shared his experiences with them, and they became an important part of his journey. Krakauer notes, "His intense desire for solitude was inextricably bound up with a desire for companionship" (Krakauer
Move on” to this response Krakauer defends himself by writing “because many people—both admirers of McCandless and his detractors—regard Into the Wild as a cautionary tale, it’s important to know as much as possible about how McCandless actually may have died.” The amount of determination of Jon Krakauer does make many critics and ordinary people question the mentally of the author however Krakauer could solve the mystery of McCandless’s
Into the Wild Christopher McCandless is a son of wealthy parents which were graduates from Emory University as a top student and athlete. Chris McCandless was seeking into the wilderness to show people he can really do it. Krakauer’s statement was proven to show his actions and support his courageous from living in the wilderness. McCandless wanted to walk to Alaska to start his journey on the hike. His adventure lasted 113 days in the wilderness which turned into something that shouldn’t have happened.
Christopher McCandless was a man that lived a very short but eventful and extraordinary life that had a lot of meaning, so much so that a novel was made to tell his life story. When the author, Jon Krakauer, wrote the story of Christopher McCandless in “Into the Wild” he developed a lot of themes throughout the novel that had significant impact to the story, as those themes affected the decisions and outcomes in McCandless’s life. Although the novel may have had many themes when reading throughout the story two apparent themes seem to affect almost every aspect of McCandless’s life story. These two themes are arrogance and idealism as they are developed thoroughly throughout the story and seem to be related as they interconnect with each other
Krakauer disagreed. “But the stereotype isn't a good fit. McCandless wasn't some feckless slacker, adrift, and confused, racked by existential despair. To the contrary: His life hummed with meaning and purpose” (Krakauer, p. 187). He saw McCandless as a young man who was trying his best to find himself through an adventure.
However, Jon Krakauer proves his argument that McCandless was not arrogant, foolish, antisocial, or crazy by giving examples of other young men who were similar to McCandless to show that his journey wasn’t unprecedented. He also proves that McCandless wasn’t antisocial because he developed personal relationships with Ronald Franz, Wayne Westerberg, and Jan Burres in such a short amount of time and explaining the many times that McCandless respected the Alaskan Bush. Krakauer admits that McCandless may have suffered from hubris; he was still a victim of circumstances. Krakauer proves that McCandless had an intrinsic motivation to discover and that he wasn’t alone because Krakauer too ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was younger. The Alaskan Bush is a very difficult place to survive if one isn’t prepared for many challenges such as hunting for food or staying warm in the frost ridden
Based on a real story, Into the Wild can make us think from different perspectives about what the main character Christopher McCandless did. Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer is a dramatic but also remarkable story from a young, newly graduated, college student that escaped for a long wild journey but never came back. As time passes throughout the book, the reader may notice how the main character interacts with society and nature, finally McCandless dies in the wild but even though he was struggling for survival he died happy. Some people never get out of their comfort zone, others are tired of it and retire from their comfort zone to have different experiences in life, some are good enough or some are terrible.