ipl-logo

Analysis Of Natural Gas Fracking Addresses All Of Our Major Problems

1603 Words7 Pages

Academic Analysis: “Natural Gas Fracking Addresses All of Our Major Problems”
In his essay, “Natural Gas Fracking Addresses All of our Major Problems,” Richard Pierce argues that by using horizontal drilling and fracturing of shale formations to obtain natural gas will solve many of our nation’s issues. He cites that by accessing our abundant supply of natural gas, the economy, environment, and geopolitical conditions will improve. He backs these claims by listing examples of recently discovered natural gas basins in the United States and abroad and by showing that the current gas supply has put downward pressure on oil prices. Lower oil prices make many products more affordable and improve the global economy. He posits that by switching …show more content…

Another benefit from switching to clean-burning natural gas is a decrease in pollutants in the air, which will decrease airborne illnesses and premature deaths. He discusses the impact of energy independence for countries that rely on insecure regions for their energy needs. For example, the U.S. will rely less on the Middle East, Europe will rely less on Russia and India will rely less on Iran. By presenting fracking as the answer to the world’s problems, Pierce counters the arguments of critics who cite the environmental problems of fracking. His paper is one-sided because he leaves out the other side of the debate by ignoring any negative aspects of fracking. His tools for persuasion include implying ideas with strategic word choice, contrasting dire world problems with hopeful …show more content…

He explicitly states that fracking to obtain natural gas has the potential to solve all of the world’s major problems. Since the essay relies on statistics and is published in “Scholarly Commons” of the George Washington University Law School, his paper seems academic. However, with multiple readings, it seems persuasive because it highlights the benefits of natural gas without giving any space to possible environmental impacts. Because fracking is divisive, it is telling that the essay provides only one side of the debate. In his introduction, he states that “my purpose in this article is just to describe the incredibly high stakes in the fracking debate by outlining the potential beneficial effects of fracking” (Pierce 3). This explanation, while wonderfully honest, only stimulates other questions. Why does he choose to present only the benefits of fracking? The statistics of his article are intriguing. He appears to understand the political, economic and environmental workings of the world, so why not present a bigger picture of the issue? The advantages that he presents are remarkable and it would be interesting to see the other side of the debate through his eyes.
The moment of the piece provides an answer to why he only chooses to present fracking’s benefits. The piece was written four years ago. When researching the pros and cons of fracking, most of the articles and websites are written before that time

Show More
Related
600 Words | 3 Pages

McAleer also found written accounts of flammable well water far before fracking began in 1947. When asked why this information was omitted from GasLand, Josh Fox says it is not relevant. He is, however, mistaken. These facts are not only relevant, but their omission makes Josh Fox an even more unreliable

Read More
335 Words | 2 Pages

The book’s narrative paints a tale of a local man who rallies his small town against the titans of big oil. Briggle’s role in fracking began when a fellow member of the city council asked him to form of group

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Oil has been running the United States of America since before the 1900s. Now, many believe that the use of crude oil is hurtful to the environment and that it should be put to a stop. In 2014, Energy Transfer Partners began construction of a pipeline that would connect North Dakota to Iowa, called the North Dakota Access Pipeline. Since the beginning of the construction, there have been small protests from the local Native American Sioux tribe, but recently the protests have gotten much larger.

Read More
116 Words | 1 Pages

What is fracking? Fracking is the process of drilling into the ground and releasing a high-pressure water mixture into rocks in order to fracture them and release the natural gases inside. The water mixture consists of water, sand and chemicals. Fracking is beneficial because it lowers the prices of oil and gas, reduces America’s dependency on foreign oil, and reduces CO2 contribution.

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

The author of the article Greg Ip, believes that despite Obama’s statement, the President knows very well that even though the pipeline will not go into fruition, fossils fuels will still

Read More
1198 Words | 5 Pages

He believes there are other ways to end Obama’s war on coal than to put the lives of coal miners and their families at risk. Using clean coal is one alternative Rockefeller presents instead of blocking the EPA’s rules on the pollutant gases. The safety of West Virginians is in his best interest. This speech reflects his ideas and beliefs about the past, present, and future use of coal. He supports the EPA’s rules on limiting mercury, acid gases, and other toxic pollution from power plants.

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

If you want to make sure the scientists aren’t causing any problems, you take away all their funding”. Duck was not alone in his concerns, scientists who became outspoken on the environmental impacts of the Alberta oil sands, were often criticized by federal government for publicly sharing their findings. For example, when David Schindler was a professor of ecology at the University of Alberta, his research team found that the resource project was contaminating the Athabasca watershed, and some fish were developing deformities. When he published this in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Schindler was criticized by federal government. “It’s like they don’t want to hear about science anymore,” Schindler stated.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

He talks about the possible benefits of the drilling while showing how they do not compare to the downsides by saying “At best, the Arctic Refuge might provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day. We can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles. Instead of tearing open the heart of our greatest refuge, we should use our resources more wisely.” Carter explains that even though a small percentage of our daily use will be covered by drilling into the Arctic Refuge, there are much better ways to go about it that don’t involve destroying nature. More fuel-efficient vehicles are given as an example that could be seen as an alternative solution that doesn’t damage the wildlife.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

In the Pro-Drilling video, it showed that a reef spilled more than 11 million gallons of oil in Alaska. This proves that anything can go wrong, so the best thing to do is not to do it at all. The Pro-Drilling video also showed that their is a decline in Alaska, by drilling it would decrease even more. In Document A, it shows a map and some animals like seals, polar bears, arctic owls, and wolves, by drilling they all will be harmed.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

But this costly project is not benefiting the United States at all. In fact, the forever fluctuating gas prices will rise, and raise 20 to 40 cents higher per gallon. The reasoning behind this is because big Canadian oil companies will not only want to distribute their oil to the United States, but also to overseas countries, in order to make their businesses more money. “The conclusion of the report is: "U.S. consumers should be wary of the Keystone XL pipeline--not just for substantial environmental and safety reasons, but because it threatens their wallets. Given the fleeting benefits of construction jobs, the unprovability of long-term benefits and the negative effect of higher

Read More
2089 Words | 9 Pages

The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Why would we turn down these great benefits? Although improved society and an economic boom are essential for a thriving nation, this process also contributing to global warming, pollution of our water and air supply, as well as the increase in seismic activity. These effects are sometimes irreversible and difficult to combat. In the case of global warming, fracking plays a huge role.

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

Fracking has changed daily Oklahoman’s lives, from their property to their income. Fracking History In 1907, when the first oil well was drilled, which was before statehood, the abundance of oil seemed to draw everyone to Oklahoma, to make a small fortune in oil. Tulsa, Oklahoma, which was once dubbed the oil capital of the world, has a small structure still dedicated to its oil days, the Golden Driller, pictured below.

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

Thesis statement The benefits of natural gas hydraulic fracking do not justify the adverse effects it causes through continuous earthquakes, pollution of the water table, or potential health hazards to human populations. This subject is interesting to me because I work for a natural gas company. I have had many conversations with other employees regarding natural gas fracking, and most of them are biased to the views of the drilling companies which means they do not see any harm in it. There also used to be companies fracking for natural gas in Arkansas on the Fayetteville Shell. The number of small earthquakes did rise (3.0 or smaller), but there was nothing resulting in a large amount of devastation.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Researchers have “requested data from Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, and Texas, all states heavily involved in the recent surge of oil and gas drilling, about complaints related to hydraulic fracking for oil and gas” for their research on fracking (Dechert).   The research collected was shocking, over 2,000 complaints in Texas alone and several cases on well water contamination within the states mentioned in Decherd’s article. People need to be alerted about how real fracking is and the damages it is doing. These complaints and cases should be a wakeup call to the world and say that we should put it to a

Read More

More about Analysis Of Natural Gas Fracking Addresses All Of Our Major Problems

Related Topics

Open Document