Analysis Of Sam Dillon's Article For The New York Times

In his article for the New York Times “Evictions at Sorority Raise Issue of Bias”, Sam Dillon conveys to light the stereotypes created from sororities and how this profiling influences those saw as undesirable. In 2007, the national officers of Delta Zeta at DePauw University interviewed 35 of its members because they were viewed as “socially awkward” (515). The purpose of the interview was to improve their image, and because they feared of the negative portrayal would result a decline in future membership of the sorority. After the interview, regarding their dedication to recruitment, 23 of 35 members were viewed as uncommitted and asked to leave the Delta Zeta, because they were overweight, Korean and Vietnamese. In this article, Dillon

He utilizes insights, from both the over a wide span of time, to bolster his convictions that the Delta Zeta sisters were kicked out of their sorority due to their physical appearance and absence of social bent. He expresses the different sizes, ethnicities, and social levels of the ladies who were basically ousted from the gathering, and unmistakably brings up the separations in who was kicked out, and who could sit tight. He gathers strong truths and, in addition, the convictions and suppositions of different understudies and personnel who needed their voice heard on this subject, with respect to what had happened at the sorority, and utilized them to convince his crowd. His strategies for influence likewise play on his audiences' feeling of profound quality, trustworthiness, and equity. A few times, he calls attention to past separations, for example, not permitting a dark understudy to join, and endeavoring to keep a blended race understudy from turning out to be a piece of their sorority (516-517). Dillon also includes that a large number of the ladies who were permitted to stay had done beside nothing to advantage their sorority, while the president herself was