ipl-logo

Analysis Of The Death Penalty In Truman Capote's In Cold Blood

1072 Words5 Pages

Dick and Perry's lives in the Book, “In Cold Blood,” were portrayed as cold blooded murders in Holcomb. The murders they committed were lethal, brutal, and some may dare to say inhumane. The killing of the Clutter family is the main focus of the book, and although you clearly can justify the fact that Dick and Perry deserve to die for what they did, Truman capote, the author of the book seems to think that the capital punishment should be stopped and was not necessary on behalf of the murders, I actually disagree. I am totally agree with capital punishment, primarily the death penalty because you do the crime and I believe if it's something incredibly inhuman, vile, and cruel, that you should be killed for it. "In Exodus Twenty, Verse Thirteen, …show more content…

Perry and Dick committed a horrific crime, that not only influence the family and friends of those people, but the entire town of Holcomb. If they had not killed them, the townspeople would then go into a state of fear and hopelessness. Letting them go off free, with no punishment equal to that of which they did is unfair to the people of the town. Capote argues against capital punishment in the book very subtly, but he contradicts himself as well. One quote from the novel says "That he knew what he was doing and still went ahead with it is possibly the most clear-cut demonstration of this fact. He is a person who is impulsive in action, likely to do things without thought of consequences or future discomfort to himself or to others (Capote 187)." This quote is basically saying how Perry is very inconsiderate of anyone's feeling that he kills, and doesn't think of the outcome, but it's as if he stays in the …show more content…

Especially if they knew what they were doing, and what they were going to do beforehand.
Even people of the town were in utter shock of what had happened. The people need to feel some sense of protection as I said earlier. "I feel that due to the violence of the crime and the apparent utter lack of mercy shown the victims,the only way the public can be absolutely protected is to have the death penalty set against these defendants (Capote 164) ." Clearly there was only one way to declare safety to these people, and it was to kill off the people who made them feel unsafe. Perry didn't realize that his one action of killing a family full of innocent people would have such a huge after effect on the town, let alone he himself. Perry and Dicks gullible decision to become murders changed the people of Holcomb and changed their lives in a tremendous

Open Document