ipl-logo

Analysis Of The Dred Scott Vs. Sanford Case

1557 Words7 Pages

Dred Scott vs. Sanford case was the biggest mistake in U.S history, hands down. It is listed as the first case of the top ten worst Supreme Court decisions. Dred scotts case was the most significant because after his, no other case had ruined the reputation of the court quite as bad. This case was a huge deal, and is still an important subject to teach to students today. This case was said to be the case that started the civil war, although that may be an exaggeration. People may argue that his case had a big contribution The the civil war because the northerners couldn’t stay quiet any longer. They were too scared of the idea of slavery coming into the free states, they couldn’t ignore it anymore. The fact that they started to do something …show more content…

You can bet that southerners were thrilled with the outcome. There was a massive abolitionist campaign to help dred Scott and his family. Many southerners twisted it and said they were anti-southerners, making them enemies of a greater union. The dred Scott case was seen by many southern slave owners and people who supported slavery as a crucial model. Giving them some legal standing to be able to say that the supreme law had not only upheld the law of slavery, but also by basically crushing the Missouri compromise. The dred Scott case resembled an eye opener to northerners who could tolerate slavery as long as it stayed in the south. Many northerners remained quiet, but the thought of slavery protruding into the free states was too terrifying for them to ignore. Northerners who hadn’t said anything before now realized they had to before it was too late, furthering the contribution to the civil war. It was only four years after the courts decision that the civil war had started. Ultimately, as awful as the outcome was for Dred Scott and his family, good things came out of it. Dred and his family did eventually get to be free, thanks to Peter Blow. The case also opened up the eyes of the northerners, warning them that if they don’t want slavery in their free states then they have to do something. The dred Scott case was the worst decision in history, but it wasn’t all

Show More
Related
961 Words | 4 Pages

In 1857 the Supreme Court overruled a previous decision by the circuit court of St. Louis County, Missouri. The Case of Dred Scott versus John F. A. Sandford would go down in history as one of the courts most erroneous rulings. This verdict called into question a slaves rights in free states, popular sovereignty and the legality of the Missouri Compromise. Dred Scott had won a previous court battle over his former master John Sandford claiming that he had assaulted his wife and children and that he should in fact be a free man because he had been moved to Illinois and Wisconsin for a time. Since both were free territories he should in fact be free.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott vs. Sanford is a Supreme Court case landmark. About a man born into slavery and taken to a free state and fight for his freedom. It is important to learn and understand about its History, background, constitutional issue, and current impact. There are many historical facts about the Dred Scott court case. Peter Blow was Dred Scott’s master since birth.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

1. Enumerate the sequence of major crises, beginning with the Kansas-Nebraska Act, that led up to secession, and explain the significance of each event? Uncle Tom's Cabin-composed in 1852 by Harriet Beecher Stowe. Stowe was an aboli-tionist who wrote this book to demonstrate the bad things that the slaves had to go through.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was a slave who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories where he attempted to sue for his freedom. By decision of Chief of Justice Roger B. Taney, the court denied Scott 's request. Many believed that Congress had no right to ban slavery from U.S. territories which brought the case to the Supreme Court. The case challenged the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment which prohibits the federal government from freeing slaves brought into federal territories. The Supreme Court ruled against Dred Scott which outraged Northerners and contributed to the start of the Civil

Read More
561 Words | 3 Pages

This act had limited the spread of slavery into the new territories. Dred was influenced to become who he is from all the hardships he’s faced as a slave and as a social activist suing for his freedom. Dred Scott became more noticed and popular when he fought in court against Sandford to gain his freedom (Dred Scott v Sandford). Dred had to overcome many things in his life to become who he was. For example, Dred scott’s guardian ms.ermon sold him to her brother; he had been a slave for a long time until he battled in court for his

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Dred Scott reported that Mrs. Emerson beat him and treated him terribly. Hence, why he decided to fight for the freedom that he believe he deserved. Two out of the three justices were pro slavery making it a hard battle to fight for Dred

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

These court cases are a big impact to African American rights and their lives. Dred Scott v. Sanford, Dred Scott and his slave owner went to Illinois (which is a free state) then came to Missouri (which is a Slave state) but unfortunately the slave owner died, Dred Scott thought since he just came from a free state he can get freedom so he sued and his case went up 2 the Supreme Court which he loss cause a slave that 's below a regular person can 't sue the government and stayed a slave. The importance of this case is that slaves are not citizen and can 't sue the government and congress had a lack of power ban slavery in U.S. Territories As to the second case Shelley bought a house in Missouri but in that neighborhood there was a there was a agreement not all has sign to keep the colored away from the neighborhood so some of the neighbors were angry and wanted to kick Shelly out of the neighborhood so she sued the head of the neighborhood and won the case because the neighbors thought her there violated he 14th amendment which didn 't and was able to live in her house. The importance of this case was the case didn 't violate the 14th amendment and it changed for black people to buy a house

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

America’s founders created the constitution in order to create unification and order in the United States. However, there have been controversy surrounding the interpretation of the constitution, this has caused debate over many issues within the country. These issues and the lack of wartime policy within the constitution directly lead to the Civil War, which was one of the worst alterations this nation has faced. The Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and Bleeding Kansas were controversial issues surrounding the constitution that directly lead to the Civil War.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

His case eventually advanced to the status of Supreme Court worthy, only leading him to an even greater distraction of his rights as a human being with the courts verbalizing that he had none. Although he wasn't voted for in any southern ballots, he still managed to win office. This meant that an anti-slavery Republican was in office, striking fear into a great majority o Southerners, This fear causes six states to secede from the Union, only breaking apart the nation even further.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

Dred Scott Case was a decision/case that fought for his freedom. Dred Scott was born into slavery, so he didn’t really have a chance to live free. Dred Scott had two different masters, Peter Blow then John Emerson. After the death of his first master, Peter Blow, Dred Scott tried to gain his freedom from a doctor but had gotten turned down because he has African Blood line and then was sold to to his other master, John Emerson. Because he was turned down he had decided to take his case to the Supreme Court.

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

The Dred Scott v. Sandford case had the greatest impact on Race Relations in America because it created a legitimate definition of the citizenship. Scott, a former slave, stated that because of his occupancy in a free state, he is a free man. The other side argued that Scott was still a slave and according to the fifth amendment, no person (master) can be deprived of their property. The initial impact of the case was in favor of the slave owner but this decision was overturned by the adoption of the thirteenth and fourteenth amendment. The thirteenth amendment ended slavery and the fourteenth amendment granted citizenship to everyone born or naturalized in the United States included former slaves who had been freed after the Civil War.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

Savannah Gitchel Mrs. Hodges-Bond Cambridge US History 3 October 2016 Meeting of the Minds Dred Scott The Dred Scott v. Sandford case was a pivotal point in leading America to civil war. The Supreme Court stated that even though Scott was in a free state, he was still the property of his owner and had to remain that way. Abolitionists were angered even further by this decision, whether they wanted complete abolishment, or just to stop the spread of slavery into the North. Reversely, the south was overjoyed with the decision.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

The growing support for nullification was quite obvious during the days of the Jackson Administration, as events such as the Webster-Hayne Debate, Tariff of 1832, Order of Nullification, and Worcester v. Georgia all made the tension grow between the North and the South. To understand this conflict and tension one must first know what made the North and South so different. The North was an industrial powerhouse, full of bustling cities, and all kinds of cultures and peoples, on the other hand was the South. The South was seen as unadvanced and prehistoric to the Northerners, as the South relied heavily on the growth of cotton to fuel their economy, giving them their name , “King Cotton”. The main difference between the two were their economies.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

“Faith is taking the first step even when you don’t see the whole staircase" —Martin Luther King , Jr. This statement implies that if someone 's current situation is not good or where they would expect it to be. And they don 't know what is to happen and they don 't want to take a risk in life if they kept moving forward. People need to learn not to be judgmental and have faith in themselves.

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

Slavery is one of the many enduring issues of inequality that can be seen throughout history. The Dred Scott Decision was one of the many examples of which slavery and inequality to blacks can be seen. Dred Scott was a slave in the South. His owner would bring him everywhere with him. One day, while they were traveling in the North, his owner

Read More

More about Analysis Of The Dred Scott Vs. Sanford Case

Open Document