Analysis Of The Kelly Cashman Vs. California Court Case

720 Words3 Pages

The present report has been prepared by myself Guadalupe Centeno on the basis of my observations carried out on March 27, 2018, at the Larson Justice Center during the Kelly Cashman VS California court case. This court case trial is being executed since the party Kelly Cashman is being charged with a DUI. The prosecutor is the attorney named Sara Beller, the defense attorney’s name is Mr. Miller, and the judge was named Otis Sterling. During this court case, two witnesses named Christine Rosas and Holy Sanchez. Christine Rosas presented her testimony and three pieces of evidence, while Holy Sanchez also presented her testimony and one piece of evidence. During this court case, the jury was also very engaged and had numerous question for both …show more content…

The overview of the case given stated that the party Kelly Kashman had crashed into a curb and when the police arrived at the scene they determined that had urinary incontinence she was driving under the influence of alcohol and other prescribed medications. Furthermore, the defense attorney claimed that Kelly Cashman went into a restaurant she habitually attends and in where she is close with the bartender. On that occasion, she attended the restaurant for a memorial service, while she was there, she asked the bartender for a Coca-Cola and when she received the cup and took a sip from it she looked at the bartender in astonishment since she realized that the drink had rum and Coca-Cola mixed. The defense attorney claims that Kelly Cashman told the bartender to give her a regular Coca-Cola after she realized it had rum, he also claims that the bartender replied by trying to persuade her to finish the drink, the bartender told Kelly Cashman “it’s medication, you will feel better”. Moreover, Kelly Cashman decided to finish the drink since she thought it would be okay since it was just one cup. However, Kelly Cashman was also taking medication for a jaw infection that she was diagnosed with. The defense attorney’s biggest claim throughout the trial was that Kelly Cashman committed “an innocent mistake”. The first witness is named Christine Rosas and she is the dental assistance of Dr. Kelsey, has been prescribing the medications that Kelly Cashman has been taking. In her testimony, she explained the day that Kelly Cashman walked into the dental office and the process that has been occurring since. She also presented 3 pieces of evidence that include the x-rays of the patient, the diagnosis record, and the medication record. The second witness is named Holy Sanchez and she is one of the nurses in charge of treating

More about Analysis Of The Kelly Cashman Vs. California Court Case