Analysis Of Too Much Homework Is Bad For Kids By Natalie Wolchover

The ‘Too Much Homework is Bad for Kids’ article, written by Natalie Wolchover is about why children shouldn’t have homework, she defined this statement fairly well by including research and painting vivid implications of how it is atrocious, by inserting scientific evidence. They have three main ideas including the author trying to conceal facts that will make her writing false or have a different reflection. The authors opinion radiates prejudice toward other people’s opinions. First, the author grasps the reader's attention by embedding an interesting hook. The first sentence is “Piling on the homework doesn’t help kids do better in school. In fact, it can lower their test scores.” By opening the article with this mind grasping verdict,

Acquiring this information, we can infer that this article can bring forward false intellectual. The author might’ve made you believe children only spend 1-2 hours on homework, but in some cases this is incorrect. Another thing that you can bring to attention is from the child’s point of view. Using the last part of the text that we diagnosed, we can look through the eyes of a child and add another side to the story. A child may not get a problem in class, but given extra time at home to work out the problem can help the child and indeed raise their test scores because, they now understand the problem given to them, rather than not understanding it and getting marked down for that. The author stated that hoarding children with homework is detrimental. I think detrimental is a rather harsh word to pertain to this topic. Detrimental is the act of harming someone and homework doesn’t physically harm someone. The author wanted this word to be more hinted because they didn’t include that it can only mentally harm the child, even then homework isn’t that atrocious. The use of the authors strong vocabulary pertains to over-exaggeration and is sometimes used in the