This presidential debate brings up many perspectives and conflict in which candidate would make a better president. Simply said, this presidential race, is like no other. In the article “If Necessary, I’ll Vote Trump Over Hillary,” that was published in February 24, 2016 by Nicole Russel, does not represent a good overview of the both candidates due to her bias opinions The Federalist Article, lacks details of Trump, but explores in depth of Hillary. Russel explains how “Clinton Has a Terrible Track Record” by breaking down the issues she faced as the Secretary of state. Furthermore, Russel explains how Hillary is proven to be a liar, and a example such as her “illegal” use of a personal email was brought up. Hillary’s personal email was a repetitive issue …show more content…
That “both the candidates are despicable and horrifying choices to lead this country”. The choice that has to be made between these two candidates is not an easy one. Russel does make it clear that both candidates lack many presidential traits, and then goes on in breaking down each candidates points and beliefs. Russel starts off with an strong statement that leads to a more critical view of Hillary. Which seemed as if Russel came out a bit strong, and presented her argument towards Hillary quicker then expected. Besides from that, Russel’s argument that made Hillary “ A Liar” and a “terrible secretary of state” seemed as an rushed argument rather than well thought out and brief. Authors statements about Hillary’s bad choices as the secretary of state, creates an obstacle in weather or not the reader can trust her facts. Overall, Russel represented many concerning issues that involve Hillary Clinton’s campaign and some of Trumps’s. Though, Russel focused more on Hillary’s issues, where as she barely touched the surface when it came to Trump. Russel lacked in equally comparing the two candidates which was the result of her bias