In the article titled “Why college football should be banned”, Buzz Bissinger argues that college football should be banned. I believe that Buzz Bissinger did not support his reasons with sufficient evidence. While he shows the reader multiple reasons why college football should be banned, he doesn’t cite any sources or show support for his claims. Bissinger shows some statistics, but does not show where he got the information from. First of all, Bissinger did not cite his sources when supporting his claim. In this article, Buzz Bissinger makes a statement but then lacks a source from which he obtained the information. He is not giving any evidence for his claims, which makes it harder to convince the reader. As he does this, the readers will not really believe what he is saying because he is just sharing a personal opinion which does not convince the reader to support his claim. For example, in paragraph ten Bissinger states “I can't help but wonder how a student at the university of Oregon will cope when in-state tuition has recently gone up by 9% and the legislature passed an 11% decrease in founding to the Oregon system …show more content…
Bissinger does not support his reason with any evidence, therefore, his reason becomes to be just an opinion. “This is just the tip of the iceberg. There are the medical dangers of football in general caused by head trauma over repetitive hits” (Paragraph 9) As shown on this quote, Bissinger shows the readers that there are medical risks to the players, those risks are caused by head trauma and repetitive hits. However, the problem that is being shown on this paragraph is not being supported by any real evidence that contains facts or data that says that football players should not play football because of the risks that the sport could cause. It also does not show any evidence that says that the sport is a risk to college students in