“And public reasons shall be rendered Of Caesar’s death.” (Act III, Scene II) In the play, “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar was killed by a group of conspirators who believed that his rule would result in the downfall of Rome, and that his death was the best solution. Marcus Brutus, who was viewed as the leader of the plot to kill Caesar, was the first to speak at his funeral, followed by Marc Antony. Each man’s speech included several examples of rhetorical strategies that ultimately swayed the audience to be in favor of one side or another. Marcus Brutus gave the better, more argumentative speech due to his effective use of rhetorical strategies.
Brutus’ funeral speech is less effective than that of Marc Antony’s because Brutus uses
After the Brutal murder of the "dictator" of Rome a formal burial in remembrance was made. The group of conspirators and a few others try and band together to make speeches to give at the ceremony. The conspirators all think that Mark Anthony is going to give a very controversial speech that is going to end in an all-out brawl to lead to anarchy. On the other hand, Brutus doesn't think that Mark Anthony is capable of such a thing so he only prepares a speech that is short, concise, and authoritative. He did not expect Anthony to pull out a huge well thought out speech that would lead to a blood bath.
Antony provides specific examples of Caesar's generosity and how he was betrayed by the conspirators, such as "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. " Antony's use of evidence helps to discredit the conspiracy and build sympathy for Caesar, further strengthening his argument. Antony's use of evidence connects to the thesis, as it demonstrates his effectiveness in building a persuasive argument. Some may argue that Marcus Brutus delivers the most effective speech because he appeals to the citizens' sense of duty and loyalty to Rome. Brutus emphasizes his love for Rome and his desire to protect it from tyranny, stating, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more."
“Antony thinks of himself to be wise, but Brutus knows himself to be a fool.” once said by William Shakespeare. Antony thinks of himself to be wise, but Brutus knows himself to be a fool. Caesar gets stabbed by the conspirators and his friend Brutus. Antony is really angry for what they did to Caesar by killing him for Brutus think he will be king.
But he didn’t need to make a plot on killing Caesar because they could’ve talked it out and give him some ideas on what to do. Using a weapon is not the first solution but sometimes it can be when a suspect is not doing what is asked. Consider the case of police officers, using deadly force when they feel physically endangered, but there’s far less legal flexibility when it comes to opening fire at fleeing individuals (Pbs Newshour). While this is true, mostly everyone talks to the person that they have a problem with to make up with them but sometimes, what and how you say expressions can make that individual feel like they have complete power over the other. When one considers killing, fighting, and death, it’s clear that the power of words can change lives and the world.
In the end, Antony beat Brutus’s speech by a mile. But why is this a problem? Antony used specific literary techniques including ethos, logos, and pathos, as well as, irony, and anecdote to further evolve his speech. Antony uses the ethos in this line to gain the trust of the audience through the fact that Brutus allows Antony to speak today. This builds trust in Antony, and that he is an “honorable man”.
Words hold more power over weapons 12/12/16 English II 2nd pd. Ms.Altamira Tylor Gonzalez In today's society, people mind control others with words; to get others to agree to ones opinion, or even do the will of ones desire. The victims of the people unknowingly make decisions based on their emotional appeals and systematic tricks, therefore allowing one to control the thought and actions of one or more people's. Words can be our uprising or our downfall, a weapon cannot,we have the power to make change and catastrophe from what we say, words are dominant over weapons.
Julius Caesar Essay Words are more powerful than weapons. Throughout the play of Julius Caesar the idea of powerful words is a key theme. Through speeches lies and cunning plans the characters in this play are able to convince people to join conspiracies and move people to action. This play reflects on the need for excellent speaking skills and its importance in ancient Rome, Elizabethan, and modern times.
Nathaniel Rodriguez Cocke English 10 April 21, 2023 Words over power weapons In what ways do words hold more power than weapons? People have shown us that words have more power than weapons all throughout our world's history. The people that thought showed the most were Martin Luther King jr, and Adolph Hitler as well as Brutus from the play Julias Caesar by William Shackspear. Martin Luther gave us an example by his famous speech, Adolph Hitler when he said,”if you wanna shine like the sun you must burn like one”.
Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar
His speech was powerful, but not powerful enough. Not soon after, Mark Antony as made a great speech. He uses his words to completely change the crowd and they begin to follow him instead of Brutus. One debater, from Debate.org, argued that words depend on weapons for anything to be done. To an extent, this may be true but it is words that control the weapons.
I was born and raised in Miami, Florida by Haitian Parents, with strong conservative family values. These values have shaped me into the man I am today. Growing up, my parents and sister were my best friends. In fact, the competition between my sister and I motivated me to study hard, and the love received from my parents gave me the confidence necessary to attain personal development at its finest. Unfortunately, I have witnessed first-hand the destruction that disease can implement on a unified family.
Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.
There are a lot of different themes that could be used to describe the play of Julius Caesar. Power is a big part of the play and is probably the best theme of it. Throughout the play, power has a big impact on the story line and the way the story goes. It is evident to the conspirators that Julius Caesar is headed for absolute power; he becomes a threat to the ideals and values of the Roman Republic. They assassinate Caesar before he can be crowned king.
