ipl-logo

Analyzing The Historical Background Of John, Luke, And Acts Of Apostles

601 Words3 Pages

The gospels are an essential part of the New Testament, the scriptures define the life and works of Jesus Christ and were to introduce him to the world as the son of God (Stanton 116). Added to the spiritual context of these chapters, theologians frequently evaluate their historical background with the main intent of comprehending the basis of certain encompassed stories and declarations. Understanding their historical background is an effective approach of analyzing the gospels in the Bible’s New Testament. This proclamation will guide the major arguments regarding the historical background of John, Luke, and Acts of Apostles.
For starters, most theologians and Christians believe that the book of Luke was written by St. Luke and the themes addressed by Luke were influenced by Paul’s schooling and preaching. In contrast, there are …show more content…

Luke was responsible for writing both books. It is debatable if Acts was written prior to the annihilation of Jerusalem by Roman’s General Titus. Some evidence is that Stephen fails to include the ruined temple in his sermon in Acts 7. Had this sermon been written after destruction of the temple, the author would’ve included the incdent to emphasize the judgment of God on Judaism. Besides, St. Luke used the books of Luke and Acts of Apostles to end the tension between the administrative and religious frameworks in the region. The Messianic views did not please the Roman government because the high ranking political officials assumed the Messiah as a threat (Balentine 101). Luke attempted to present the two structures as crucial to the populace and capable of existing harmoniously. One example is in Luke 23:4, where Luke quotes Pontius Pilate who states that he finds no fault in Jesus prior to His crucifixion. Which is like Acts 26: 31-32, the author presents Rome’s government officials as respectable individuals (King James

Show More
Related
605 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion of reading O’Collins, the subjective nature of our historical knowledge and knowledge of other people, should not be limited to the fact that we are all historically and culturally conditioned. This influences our deepest desires and primal questions that shape our existence, but here and now find incomplete fulfilment and temporary answers. Second, when drawing on the Gospels we can use the widely accepted scheme of three stages in the communication of testimony to Jesus’ deeds and words: 1) The first stage in his earthly life when his disciples and others spoke about

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

Name: Steven Kerr Period: 5 Luke-Acts Project Gospel of Luke Chapter 3 Reflection over Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Summary Jesus when he was a man before me started his minister he went in the desert for 40 days and nights. While he was out there the devil stated to appear to him trying to make tempt him by first making rock into bread, second to command temples, third to toss himself off of the temple and save himself. After all of these days Jesus returns to Galilee, and has the power of the holy Spirit. He later says that he fulfills the scripter for God sending his only son.

Read More
1367 Words | 6 Pages

Luke Timothy Johnson provides the Catholic perspective for the book “Four Views on the Apostle Paul.” What he has to say is that Acts, despite being indispensable for our understanding Paul’s life, was written by Luke, and therefore any search for Paul’s thought cannot be done in Acts. (Location 1034) Johnson then goes on to say that the reasons for rejecting six of Paul’s letters are “formally and materially flawed.” (Location 1062)

Read More
227 Words | 1 Pages

Luke joined Paul’s group in Troas around 51. From there, Luke journeyed to Samothrace, Neapolis, Philippi, Miletus, Tyre, Caesarea, and Jerusalem (D). Luke was the last member of Paul’s group that remained with him in his final prisoning. Luke’s gospel concerns social justice and the poor. Only in Luke are the stories about the Good Samaritan and the Samaritan leper found.

Read More
315 Words | 2 Pages

First off, the evidence that Luke may not be the writer of the Gospel bearing his name is that the books of Luke nor Acts, records him by his name in any way, shape, or fashion (“Did Luke Write The Gospels Of Luke?”, n.d.). Unfortunately, each of these books was written technically anonymous. Another thing scholar question, is if Luke was the author, then why would he write in the first person; however, quickly change to third person narrative? We know from this author, he did travel with Paul and speaks of specific events, which now leads back to Luke being just that the author of both. With this said, how can we ignore the evidence that points to Luke being the writer of the Gospel of Luke as he had such a knowledge of Paul travels, actions,

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

Luke uses theological emphasis in his writing to explain the fulfilment of the prophecies and the necessity of his suffering and resurrection. This is shown in “Then he said to them, “These are my words which I spoke to you, while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the law of Moses and the prophets and the psalms…” it shows the importance of the Psalms and the Laws of

Read More
222 Words | 1 Pages

THE BOOK OF ACTS SPEAKS Who Wrote the Book of ACTS? Luke: The Physician, the Brother of Titus wrote The Book of Luke and The Book of Acts. Where Are We?

Read More
264 Words | 2 Pages

The Gospel of Luke emphasizes on Jesus’ friendship to not only the Jews, but to the Samaritans and other so-called outcasts of the time. In his account, Luke chooses to highlight how Jesus places the highest value on the good character of others rather than on their social status, race, or nationality. I believe that Luke wished to promote Jesus’ character by showing him as compassionate, humble, and sympathetic. Luke uses parables and stories to illustrate what he regards as an essential characteristic of Jesus’ work and uses them to provide an authentic account of the teachings of Jesus. For example, in the parable of the Good Samaritan, Jesus characterizes one man’s mercy for another as a means of inheriting eternal life.

Read More
171 Words | 1 Pages

I do think that Luke’s portrayal of Jesus should affect the actions and priorities of those who follow Christ. Luke provided a clear picture of how Christians should live their daily lives. Jesus was considered the perfect man and Christians should do their best to follow in his steps. Luke’s portrayal of Jesus shows even though certain

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

The Passion of Jesus Christ is one the most significant and complex events in both history and the Catholic church. Due to its uttermost importance to the Catholic faith, it is not surprising that there are various accounts of the event across the Bible. Specifically, the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke, both recount the Passion of Jesus Christ in thorough detail in hopes of providing an accurate account to their respective audiences. However, due to their dissimilarities as authors, as well as the different audiences they are writing too, the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke greatly differ when it comes to the passion narratives. Even though the Gospel of Luke and the Gospel of Matthew greatly differ when it comes to their

Read More
1307 Words | 6 Pages

Matthew and Luke were both evangelists. They both helped to spread the Gospel, the good news of Jesus. Their telling of the Gospel is very similar, yet very different at the same time. They are similar because they both tell the same story.

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

He was a known companion of Paul and is also said to have written the Acts of the Apostles. He is also recorded to have taken into consideration a lot of eye-witness accounts and opinions. Historians say that Luke was most likely a physician

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

The Book of Acts was written by Luke around 80-90 CE. This book is addressed to Theophilus just like the gospel of Luke. The Book of Acts focuses on the early Christian church with all the flair of an exciting adventure novel (Powell, 191). Along with the beginnings of the church, the book focuses on two people the apostle Peter and Paul. It gives a detailed account of the Gospel spread from Israel, northward to Antioch, and then westward to Asia Minor, Greece, and finally Rome, the heart of the Roman Empire.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

There is internal evidence from Paul himself in the “we” sections in the book of Acts. These passages can reveal to the reader that the author of Luke-Acts was with Paul for a short while on his second missionary journey (Acts 16:10-17). One can also conclude that the author has stayed with Paul in Caesarea after Paul’s arrest and he has accompanied him to Rome (Acts 27:1-28:16). It would be hard for the reader to understand who Luke is in depth from Paul’s writings, but Paul does write that he was a physician (Col. 4:14) and that he was a fellow worker (Philem. 24). Also, in Colossians 4:11, 13-14, “Paul associates Luke with is Gentile rather than Jewish companions.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

The author is referenced several times in the New Testament starting in the book of Acts and finally in the book of Mark was probably written in Italy, and perhaps even Rome. This book has 16 chapters and is the shortest book of the four gospels. However, the details of the events and miracles of Jesus in this book are

Read More

More about Analyzing The Historical Background Of John, Luke, And Acts Of Apostles

Related Topics

Open Document