ipl-logo

Analyzing William Fulbright's The Arrogance Of Power

709 Words3 Pages

William Fulbright wrote the article chosen for critical evaluation and he composed “The Arrogance of Power”. This article has been read and reviewed to determine if his argument and or statements are valid and truthful. Granted his work was composed and intended during the Vietnamese war, the message he was trying to convey can still be applied to our time. Upon reading his work, it would be sound to say the structure is well written. The author laid out his points in a logical manner. The author utilized certain tactics such as ethos, pathos and logos to help convey his message as well and this essay will demonstrate them. Senator Fulbright had a powerful message and he recognizes that our nation like others is powerful. He recognizes that while our nation is growing and while it grows it continues to display a tone that may not represent America. Other nations issues should not be adopted as our own. Like it was stated, authors will use certain methods to persuade the reader into agreeing with their point of view or just …show more content…

This riot was initiated by the very people our nation was trying to assist which lead to an overwhelming concern. Similar to the situation then, our nation still suffers the same fate and scrutiny today. The presence our government sustains in other nations causes a level of friction (Nacos 32). This friction or disagreements even though they may be insignificant will eventually amount to something that can no longer be tolerated and tarnish the very view the host nation once had. The author is stating that as a nation, our views should not always be their views. Some nations are content with their form of government and maybe they are just ultimately afraid of change. It is not up to our government to determine what is best for

Show More
Related
446 Words | 2 Pages

In the majority of the article, more than half, Sloan seriously questions patriotic slogans. He examines the words of each one that comes to mind and provides illustrations that question the particular slogans meaning. Furthermore, each of his observations is followed up with a question.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Undoubtedly, The President is the furthermost known person in a country due to the position he occupies and many times his actual power has been questioned. Two distinct perspectives arose to describe the president’s power as persuasion and unilateral power. First, the persuasive perspective from Richard Neustadt illustrates presidents’ power as persuasive. It highlights what Neustadt believes that is a misconception among the general public who believe that the president is a supreme authority that governs the country, as he prefers from his oval office.

Read More
215 Words | 1 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that” In the article, Leonard Pitt emphasizes that the tragic event will not weaken them but will bring them in unity. Leonardo Pitts emphasizes that the attack will bring together the nation by using the rhetorical devises anaphora and parallelism.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

The author 's primary point is that, the Americans were in bad economic times and needed revival. He names the day of the speech as a day of national consecration, and is certain that, his fellow Americans expect that on his induction into the Presidency he will address them with a candor and a decision which the present situation the nation was facing. He emphasizes on the need to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. The Americans had no need to turn a blind eye on the conditions the country was facing. He begins by asserting his firm belief that the only thing that the Americans had to fear is fear itself.

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

On August 8th, 1974 at exactly 9:01 pm, Richard Nixon--former President-- gave a speech that would affect both United States history and the american people. Richard Nixon’s argument and claim lay within the textual aspects, in other words, his tone, attitude, and the strategic ways of presenting to his audience. In this historical speech, Richard Nixon broadcasted his character, past decisions, and future advice to the people of the United States in order to justify his resignation from the presidential office. The rhetorical stylistic tools were effective and instrumental in backing up the argument. Recognition of audience was important, because it will determine his attitude and tone, which was innocence.

Read More
1221 Words | 5 Pages

When hearing George Washington’s Farewell Address for the first time it is easy to understand it is well written and the substance is things he really felt is important. However once the time is spent relating his speech to todays times and problems the magnitude of his word is really understood. Almost 250 years later and 44 more presidents, George Washington’s thoughts still apply perfectly to the current state of the U.S. So much has change sense he gave this address but unity, Stoping the divide of political parties, morality, and avoiding entangling

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

In John F. Kennedy’s incentive Inaugural Address speech, he inspires his audience by using rhetorical devices such as antithesis, parallelism and pathos to create unity and expand human rights in his country. The first implement that is introduced in this speech is

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

When America, as we know it today, was created, it had just freed itself from an unwanted, suffocating European power. The people wanted nothing to do with foreign affairs and their presidents’ policies reflected that. As America moved forward and established themselves as a world power, they began to want more. At the turn of the twentieth century, this want for more hit its peak and because of other circumstances, more was just within reach. America had always prided themselves in staying out of foreign problems and focusing inward, but now a new age was dawning.

Read More
1842 Words | 8 Pages

Time and history has shown us over and over again the power of words. Great leaders of societies obtain that magnetic pull with words that enable them to reach masses of people throughout the world. It’s all determined by how the speaker or the writer tries to convey his or her message and what they hope to achieve with their words. The Cuban writer, José Martí evidently establishes his political views through his written piece, “Our America”. Martí’s written work is manifested by his political choice of words and distinct approaches that speak to both his fellow Cubans and the higher nation that is the United Sates throughout his essay.

Read More
385 Words | 2 Pages

Thomas Jefferson, one of the greatest revolutionary thinkers that ever existed, believed in the power of rebellion. He reasoned that conflict between government and the people occurred naturally. Jefferson “ hold[s] it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing” because he believes it to be “as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.” This deep quote relates to the theme of conflict since conflicts between governments and their people lead to rebellions. Furthermore, this quote indicates that conflict plays an important role in society even at the national level.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

Thus, according to Washington, the destiny of the country was not only in the hands of the future political leaders, but also in the hands of ordinary people, who need to make their choice in favor of one or another political leader. Thus, taking everything into deliberation, it is possible to conclude that it is impossible to overestimate the contribution of George Washington into the country’s well-being and development, while his Farewell Address became not only an end point of his career, but it also became an attempt to improve the lives of all American people in their future without Washington. George Washington issued his Farewell Address to the people half month before the date of the next election, and exactly this Address, in addition to announcing his decision to no longer qualify for the post of the American President, presented his views on the future of the United States and made recommendations as to which line we should follow Government in the conduct of foreign and domestic

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

Thus, the virtu of the United States of America, and its statecraft (as Jones and Martin put it) is firmly based in the principles proposed by Obama in his speech. In this discussion, only a section of his principles have been applied as it relates to the veteran’s speech. Most of the speech is based in the fact that the veteran issue needs to be address as these people are the ones who served the country in order to keep its citizens safe. They are an important part of the fabric of the nation and are at the forefront of the nation to “preserve the state in a sea of

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

The feeling of wariness for those in politics was not always existent; although only three presidents have faced impeachment charger, only one president has left office. Richard Nixon was the thirty seventh president of the United States, a man in the public eye for many years as both a U.S. representative and Senator (“Richard”), well educated and around sixty when he resigned from the position as president. On the evening of August 8, 1974, Nixon delivered his resignation speech over a public broadcast from his Oval Office to the people of the United States. The former president gave this speech to inform the nation of the upcoming changing president; he also voiced his hopes for the country in future affairs, especially the foreign policies

Read More
2136 Words | 9 Pages

[the riot] and carried it through alone; the decision their own and their own action. Capable of their own action” (Ellison

Read More
584 Words | 3 Pages

People these days can be hypocritical telling other people they can 't do something ,and turn around and do it themselves. Some people don 't care that their ignorance of the law destroys others rights. As the government becomes less laissez faire; they gain more power over everyday life and strip people of their freedoms and rights. Overtime each individual within the population slowly losing their individual rights, and in turn the whole population weakens in power. Raised to be ignorant of their own right ignorant people will raise other people ignorant of their rights as well.

Read More

More about Analyzing William Fulbright's The Arrogance Of Power

Related Topics

Open Document