ipl-logo

Anarchism Vs Communism Essay

1024 Words5 Pages

There are many ideologies, each with differing opinions pertaining to what defines the legitimacy of a government and under what circumstances the state deserves its citizens' allegiance or not. Two well-defined ideologies with distinct points of view on this discussion are Anarchism and Communism. Anarchism is distinctive due to its belief that the most legitimate form of government is no government at all, while Communism is more represented by its enthusiasm towards a working-class state with shared means of production. Each theory makes unique points to support its argument about what the basis of what a valid government is embodied by, allowing the reader to think critically about their conceptions of what a “legitimate government” truly is.
Anarchism believes that the basis for a legitimate government that is worthy of the people’s allegiance is no government at all. The ideology stands for a stateless society, lacking a hierarchy or any authority capable of oppressing the citizens that reside under its power. Anarchism proposes a societal structure that is voluntary and highly individualistic, formed by local co-operative communities. The ideology believes …show more content…

The ideology suggests a revolution in order to create a government where everyone is equal and all resources and wealth are evenly distributed. The bourgeoisie, who possessed the most wealth and exploited their fellow members of society, would be replaced by the proletariat, creating a one-party working class system. The flaw with this idea is that once the proletariat replaces the bourgeoisie, the abused will become the abuser, and the class that used to be the proletariat will begin oppressing a new lower class. The new lower class will be working yet reaping no rewards, and being exploited by the new “bourgeoisie” class, under the false claim that the new one-party government intends to represent the working

Show More
Related
842 Words | 4 Pages

1. How do you think Raina voted on proposition 71? How would you have voted? Why?

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

According to The American Heritage Dictionary, anarchism is the belief in the abolition of all government and the organization of society on a voluntary, cooperative basis without recourse to force or compulsion. Emma Goldman, however, had different ideas which is why she wrote an entire book titled Anarchism: What it Really Stands for along with her many other writings. According to her, anarchism wasn’t just a definition or an ideology. It was so much more than that. To her, it was a lifestyle.

Read More
1677 Words | 7 Pages

The Primary objective of all leaders should be to control citizens. A society that allows authority to be challenged will never succeed. This source depicts an authoritarian or totalitarian view of what a governing body should look like. The author suggests that the primary objective of government should be the “control of the citizens”, and therefore that the individuals should entirely obey said government.

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

the authors explain in this section that if people are pushed into a government that does not allow them to uphold their rights, then they are in their own rights to overthrow the current rulers in the pursuit of a better, and more just mode of governing. these beliefs are outlined in the next paragraph, where parallel structures are used in order to create a more impactful and riveting read. “. . . That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government . . .” (CITATION NEEDED).

Read More
124 Words | 1 Pages

In "Anarchism: What It Really Stands For," Goldman points out the myth of anarchism. Anarchism is impractical, and it stands for violence and destruction, so it must be rejected as dangerous. Anarchists believe that the state is unnecessary because order and social harmony can arise naturally and spontaneously. They also view the state as evil because it goes against the principles of freedom and inequality. On the other hand, anarchists do not believe in laws because human knows what is good and bad and how to act appropriately in the society.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Greece is a land covered by mountains with nothing much else to it yet one of the greatest civilizations ever to exist on this planet. Greece is part of Europe but is made up of more than 6,000 islands as well as a peninsula. Ancient Greeks live over 2500 years ago and considering their geography it is remarkable that they got to the greatness that they did get to. But they could have been even greater if the geography Greece had cooperated with the ancient Greek cities and citizens in the areas of their economy, their social/cultural ways, and their political beliefs.

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

Marx and Engels write that “ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions,” (Marx and Engels 34). This will only be successful if the proletarians work undivided. Marx and Engels believe that a perfect society would be one run by the proletariat. They must rule over all and take away private property, inheritance, they must establish State capital, communication and transportation, production, industrial armies, public schools, child labour laws, etc. (26-27).

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

The liberal capitalist democratic ideology encompasses five traits. They consist in participating in political pluralism, investing in science, focusing on accumulating capital and setting a goal to industrialize, which also leads to urbanization. Alternative ideologies, namely communism and authoritarian governments, primarily challenge the idea of pluralism. China, for example, is currently industrializing at an incredible rate, and is also very competitive in the science fields. Most illiberal governments currently use a hybrid capitalist market system to boost growth.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

Moreover, Locke directly defied the authority of his government when he taught “authority for all legitimate government does not come from God … but rather from the people themselves.” (Fox and Pope 31). Thus we see, that the only way a government is genuine is if the people have a direct say in the way they are led and who is leading. A republic government with representatives that speak on behalf of the mind and heart of the

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

A country without a government is like a seed without water, the seed or the country does not grow to show its full potential. A government protects citizens from enemies that deprive them of their rights. Thomas Jefferson said, “among there are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, government are instituted among men.” There comes a time where the government makes decisions that have a negative outcome on citizens.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

Communism in the Cold War "The seeds of totalitarian regimes are nurtured by misery and want, they spread and grow in the evil soil of the poverty and strife. They reach their full growth when the hope of a people for a better life has died. We must keep that hope alive." as said by Harry S. Truman on march 12, 1947 in The Truman Doctrine.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

The political philosophy is a general view of specific principles or attitudes toward the government. It questions the government’s limit and their control over the individuals. The meaning of equality and the enforcement of law the basis of economic freedom, and many other issues regarding government. It examines the nature and possible arguments of political organization for example anarchism. The questions that political philosophy ask are: Is the government a cleverly disguised as thieves?

Read More
134 Words | 1 Pages

Abstract This paper compares and contrast two political ideologies Libertarianism, and Anarchism according to the scope of the government’s action that the people are willing to accept. Both of these ideologies vary in their own belief and view of what the purpose of the government should be, and its limitations. Libertarianism is the concept of limiting the power of the government except when it is necessary to protect life and property. Libertarians believe that the government should not be allowed to promote order nor equality, and to be more restricted when dealing with its power.

Read More
976 Words | 4 Pages

Every Political ideology from staunch libertarians to communists debate the role of government.    Political author, George Orwell, believes the role of government is to establish a national identity based on patriotism over nationalism and focu on domestic needs over foreign struggles to power. Orwell describes patriotism as the “devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people” (“Notes on Nationalism” 1).  One the other hand, nationalism is “the habit of identifying oneself with a single nation or other unit, placing it beyond good and evil and recognizing no other duty than that of advancing its interests” (“Notes on Nationalism” 1). In essence,

Read More
1435 Words | 6 Pages

ABSTRACT : A number of political philosophers put forward theories related to the perspectives of the state. One of these theories is the theory of Anarchism. The basic principle on which the theory stands is that society exists without the state, a society which is based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups . The origin of the idea of Anarchism can be traced back to several years Before Christ.

Read More

More about Anarchism Vs Communism Essay

Related Topics

Open Document