Andreas Vesalius’ work trailblazed scientific evolution. Defiance from the church created unsettled commoners who despised Vesalius. In contrast, this defiance was combatted with ideas of rebirthing Europe. The pull between Europe’s upcoming evolution and at the same time the need to treasure its religious beliefs appear in Andreas Vesalius’ life and his work. Andreas Vesalius allowed the expansion of anatomy and the extinction of taboos through his strenuous work in anatomical dissection while pioneering student learning better than anyone in the 16th Century or prior using fresh ideas of the Renaissance.
In the 1500s, dogma laid a path that scientists needed to cross during the European revolution. The Catholic Church created regulations
…show more content…
Cladus Galiunus was a Greek biologist who was seen to be the father of anatomy and the most revolutionary to anatomy to some. Galen became a comparison to Vesalius in his reputation for instituting fundamental parts of anatomy and biology. Galen ended up being an effective influence up until the 16th century but, while being a prominent factor in history he only studied animals to deduce human anatomy, making his research only reliable for 1,000 years until Vesalius proved his information faulty ("History of Anatomy''). Galen's time period of 100-200 AD was heavily influenced by religion similar to Vesalius’ period but with more strict codes. Galen's connection with higher power through religion made Galen so reputable. Galen's concepts were thought to be error-free, and they were supported by the church which backed up that diseases were caused by body disturbances that had treatments such as bloodletting and purging which were thought to restore balance (Splavski et al.). People have concluded however, Galen's theories were used extensively but based on theories, not facts, which made it easy for Vesalius to prove 200 of Galen's theories wrong ("History of Anatomy''). These quotes prove how well respected Galiunus was until time passed and error was seen in his work. Veslius disproved Galen's theory but also revolutionized medicine as stated. His book mentions comparisons and …show more content…
The renaissance was a time of exploration with concepts unfolding that led to great discoveries. For doing great work Vesalius was recognized and praised in some ways. Barr tells us one of these ways Vesalius was complimented; Andreas Vesalius dedicated his book to the emperor at the time, Emperor Charles V who when seeing the book and its success of it appointed him as 'medicus familiaris ordinrious' until he resigned his position on the throne (Barr). Vesalius's futuristic thinking was most likely inspired and able to happen because of the renaissance. Without more open thoughts of commoners and even higher-power people, far-out ideas were not as accepted. All the embrace was met with equal amounts of rejection. Vesalius was hated by many due to his disregard for church policies. According to Gordon, Vesalius' theories were not particularly appreciated in the medical community (Gordon). Vesalius rejected main principles the church set for anatomy which was seen as blasphemous. The mix of renaissance reforms and pulls to traditional Christian notions is a battle in Vesalius’ work and entire life. During his last days, he was seen at the holy lands. While nobody knows what led to his death, the amount of hate he was getting is what people assume drove him to go to Israel. Splavski makes a point by saying, the Middle Ages pushed