Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act
March 15, 1767 is Andrew Jacksons date of birth in South Carolina. His mother and two brother were killed during the British invasion of the Carolinas which left him with hate toward Great Britain. Andrew Jackson ended up married to Rachel Robards. Jackson was elected quickly to the U.S. Senate however, he quit a year later and was elected Tennessee's judge of the superior court. Later he was picked to be the run the state militia.
The Indian Removal Act, passed by congress, provided for the resettlement of all Native Americans occupying the east of the Mississippi to Oklahoma.
Even if the government had listened to the Cherokees after the ratification of the Treaty of New Echota when they gave their, “earnest, solemn, and reiterated protestations”, of the treaty history could have changed. A number of different, and better, outcomes exist that would not have caused so much grief and loss of life in this beautiful country. That being said, history remains the same and Jackson’s actions incapacitated Native Americans’ growth and
Andrew Jackson and Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. The Indian Removal authorized the relocation of Native Americans from the lands East of the Mississippi River and to the west. The plan was finished by moving the Native Americans to what is now Oklahoma. The Indian Removal Act was meant to support the expansion of the United States without interference by moving the Natives out of the way. The Indian removal act was rationalized by the self-serving concept of manifest destiny, the belief that the expansion of the United States from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean was divinely ordained and inevitable, was used to justify the eviction of Native Americans from their native homelands.
Bill debates that were proposed by Jackson began later on in February, 1830. Between the House and the Senate, the debate was quite relentless. Many people that went against this bill had many concerns with it, that needed to be discussed. They felt as if they could feel the Native American’s pain as they went through all that trouble. They also felt like they didn’t want to both the Indians during treaty-making.
Contrary to a popular, exaggerated thought among the settlers in the 1800s—that the West was unoccupied and perfect for settlers to claim—around a quarter million Native Americans inhabited these lands for long periods of time. Some lived there as a result of the Indian Removal Act (1830), where many tribes in the east were forced to walk the “Trail of Tears” and were relocated to present-day Oklahoma. Settlers viewed these groups as potential threats that would interfere with their westward expansion plans. Therefore, they wished for these tribes to be removed from the Great Plains. To accomplish these goals, treaties were created, but eventually, settlers and the local militias, with the support of the federal government, used more violent and drastic methods.
I think there are four main connections that can be made between this piece and the U.S policies in 1830, and all four points are about the four distinct groups present in the piece. The group on the far left is putting up a cross, which symbolizes both how Europeans moved west to spread Christianity and also symbolizes that the actions taken were made in the name of Christianity. In 1830 people, including Jeremiah Evarts were still trying to convert the Native Americans; despite trying to convert the natives, Evarts was firmly against the Indian Removal Act. I think that the piece above represents the conflicting nature of Evarts argument that the natives were people; however, they still needed to assimilate to a certain degree before they
Furthermore, Natives occupied only a small portion of the territory as evident by the concentration of migrants in the southern most area (Doc 7). Naturally, this transition wasn’t seamless as some tribes refused to leave their sacred homeland. The Cherokees were a prominent opposer, having been forcibly removed and subjected to the infamous Trail of Tears in 1838. Despite being known as the tribe most assimilated to American society, the Cherokees were still forced to leave their ancestral home. Jackson and other politicians reasoned that the removal was for the Native Americans’ own safety and the preservation of their culture, but the removal only tore tribes away from the origins of their culture and
In 1830, just a year after taking office, Jackson pushed a new piece of legislation called the "Indian Removal Act" through both houses of Congress. It gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state. This act affected not only the southeastern nations, but many others further north.
Before any calls were made , a few tribes went peacefully , but many resisted this relocation policy. Andrew Jackson was a flagrant man. A lot of the Indians felt as though they were being treated with injustice and it was just plain
In fact the common man of the time—whether he was a powerful blueblood or a humble Christian—didn’t believe that the Native Americans should be able to keep their land for quite a few reasons. They felt that Native Americans were prohibiting the United States from truly expanding to its fullest potential not to mention they also felt threatened by the Natives being so close. So, Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act in 1830. However, there were American Indians that refused to leave their home lands for the lands promised to them further west in what would now be Oklahoma. Eventually they were forcibly removed by American troops.
Once Andrew Jackson left office as President, the newly elected President Van Buren followed through with the plans of the Manifest Destiny and the Indians would not stop the settler’s greed for new lands and the promise of riches. Native Americans were forcibly removed from their native homes by federal soldiers under Van Buren. (Foner) They were moved east of the Mississippi River to the newly established "Indian Territories" in the west. The Cherokee Trail of Tears resulted from the execution of the Treaty of New Echota of 1835 which was an “agreement” signed under the Indian Removal Act of 1830.
Would you remove an abundance of Indians from their homes for money? That is what the Indian Removal Act did. Hundreds of Native Americans were taken from their homes. Andrew Jackson and John Ross had a debate on if they should get rid of the Indian Removal Act or if they should keep it. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction.
Andrew Jackson caused the death of 12,290 Indians during Indian removal. Andrew Jackson was the 7th President of the United States of America and a former general during the War of 1812.He quickly rose to power by being the “voice of the common man” he had 11 children and a wife yet he also signed one of the most conservation act ever the Indian Removal Act. Andrew Jackson shouldn 't be allowed to be on our money because he caused the death of tens of thousands of Indians and violates the constitution.
This essay considers how Cherokees responded to the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This Act, promoted by the seventh President of the United States Andrew Jackson, enabled the United States government to relocate the “Five Civilized Tribes” to reservations west of the Mississippi River. The majority of Americans supported removing Southeastern Amerindians. American settlers were eager to gain access to Cherokee lands in Georgia. The Indian Removal Act resulted in the mass transplantation of Indian tribes known as the “Trail of Tears.”
More about Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act
How Did Andrew Jackson Contribute To The Indian Removal Act
464 Words | 2 PagesComparison Of Jackson Vs. The Indian Removal Act
341 Words | 2 PagesThe Indian Removal Act
818 Words | 4 PagesHow Did Andrew Jackson And Congress Pass The Indian Removal Act
234 Words | 1 PagesBill Debates Between President Jackson And The Indian Removal Act
726 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act
1004 Words | 5 PagesIndian Removal Act And Us Policies In 1830
370 Words | 2 PagesUs Government Policy Toward Native Americans Dbq
684 Words | 3 PagesDbq Indian Removal
1615 Words | 7 PagesHow Did Andrew Jackson Address To Congress On Indian Removal
550 Words | 3 PagesHow Did Andrew Jackson's Presidency Corrupt
764 Words | 4 PagesAndrew Jackson Democracy Pros And Cons
422 Words | 2 PagesThe Indian Removal Act By Andrew Jackson And John Ross
476 Words | 2 PagesAndrew Jackson During Indian Removal
91 Words | 1 PagesCherokees Response To The Indian Removal Act Of 1830
1887 Words | 8 Pages