In my opinion, I believe that Andrew Jackson did an all-right job in his presidency. However, he was also somewhat of a good president. But Jackson’s treatment of the Native Americans was very harsh. Jackson would have no mercy on the Native Americans. Nevertheless, Jackson also had his reason for doing so. Jackson dealt with the Nullification Crisis in a good way. Jackson also dealt with the Bank War very well. I reckon Andrew Jackson did somewhat care about his regular folks. I believe that because Jackson would be rude to many Native Americans. It states that here “President Andrew Jackson had little sympathy for Native Americans”. He would force them out of their land. But again, Jackson had his own reasons for why he did that. But for the most part, many Americans loved Jackson, because Jackson would also care about them deeply. He cared so much for the nation, he decided to stay and fight for them. It states that here “His daring defense of the city made him a national hero”. Jackson, in my opinion, was a very cruel man to the Native Americans. Jackson would do very awful things to the Native Americans. It states that, “Jackson also signed the Indian Removal Act of May 28, 1830”. Which made Native Americans move west and leave everything behind, including …show more content…
I believe that because of the Nullification Crisis it was unfair. Some states got affected a lot, well other states got affected a little bit. But at the same time I do trust that he did an alright job because the tariffs placed were also a good thing. Yes, it was somewhat unconstitutional, but Jackson did have a good point. Jackson said, “ Citing the tariff to be in the best interest of the nation “. Also for the Bank war, I think Jackson did abuse his power. He abolished the National Bank. Jackson abolished the bank because it was “corrupt”. But at the same time, it was good because he was able to pay off the whole National