ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

789 Words4 Pages

Andrew Jackson was one of the many presidents of the United States that had to deal with getting the United States out of harsh situations. Andrew Jackson always had a strong opinion about a lot of things and wasn't easily influenced by others. While many people saw him as a man of the people, some also viewed him as a bad president. However, everyone has a different perspective of Andrew Jackson and what kind of person he was. He has gotten his country out of many battles but has also killed a large majority of innocent people throughout his life. There is evidence and proof that Jackson has mistreated a certain group of people like the Native Americans and has not been considerate of other opinions on things like the National Bank. Many …show more content…

He had a strong belief that the bank was unconstitutional and it had to go. This belief mainly came from the reasons that the bank only befitted certain members of society and it would be incredibly reckless. We can clearly see that he disagrees with having a national bank in Jackson and his war with the national bank when it states “Secondly the bank only befits elite members of society as it was run by a board of directors with ties to industry, manufacturing and finance” (paragraph 3). After Jackson won the election of 1828 he had a plan to cut off all the funds to the bank so it could no longer keep in business. Also known as “Starving the bank to death” however, to do this he would have to win the election in 1832. Even though Jackson knew it was not going to be easy to be reelected he pulled through and in 1822 Jackson officially announced a plan to remove all the funds from the national bank.They would now have to share the funds with other banks which made then less and less money. Then on September 10th, 1833 the national bank was completely out of business. Ultimately, many in Congress believed that Jackson had abused his power and kicked him out of office. Even so, Jackson left office happy that he killed the bank and it was no longer in business. So in conclusion, Jackson's actions affected everyone and had a huge impact on the events that will happen in the future like the civil

Show More
Related
491 Words | 2 Pages

This leads to the topic, why did Jackson want to destroy the bank? Well first I need to tell you what the second bank was and what kind of roles it played in the economy. They had the power to act exclusively as the federal government's financial agents. The bank did many other things like half federal deposits, made transfers to federal funds between states, and dealt with payments or receipts involving the federal government.

Read More
267 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson wanted and even gave everyone equal economic opportunity by lessening monopoly with his bank veto. However, the financial panic of 1837 was caused by two of his plans, these include pet banks and Specie Circular. People in favor of the national bank proposed a renewal bill for the Second National Bank's charter. Jackson was not necessarily opposed to central banking as much as he was to the idea of the Second National Bank. By opposing the bill, the Second Bank expired and the US would be without an official bank for many years.

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

However Jackson believed that the bank was unconstitutional. He was not very fond of the fact that the wealthy people in the country benefited from the bank, while the people in poverty did not. Like many other Americans at the time, Jackson strongly believed that the National Bank had too much power, however he also believed that the bank was bad for the economy which was not true. The National Bank strongly backed the United States economy. Many knew this, including Henry Clay, who knew that if the bank no longer existed the economy would soon fall apart.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout his life and presidency, Andrew Jackson had acceptable ideas but executed them incorrectly. Jackson believed in a government with less power, and strived to achieve this. I believe many of the policies he created and things he set in place had the correct morals behind it, but they now paint Andrew Jackson out to be an unbearable man. Jackson did not care for the opinion of others and ran things for the people and for the great or good of America. One main occurrence where Andrew Jackson had the right intentions with poor implementation was the removal of the Second National Bank.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson was a military leader, a general and someone who people looked as “The man of the people. ”How Jackson acted with people was mixed emotions. People liked him and others not so much. He liked to gamble and bet on horse races when he was young. He was also an orphan since his father died before he was born and his mother died.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of the United States, he served two terms from March 4, 1829 up until March 4, 1837 and was the first member of the democratic party to be elected president. Jackson fought his way into leadership was favored by the common people in hope that he would be a president for the people and not for the special interest of the rich. Andrew Jackson’s presidency was a stepping stone in american politics and would lead the way for future presidents to come especially ones in the same political party as him, the democrats. Andrew Jackson was a president for the people and helped the young United States expand and grow stronger as a democracy during his eight years in the white house. He used his presidential authority to the extent that he was allowed to help the United States grow to what it is today and help the american citizen throughout their struggle.

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

During Andrew Jackson’s time in office, he did a neutral job as president. He had his ups and downs, including how he handled Native Americans and the national bank. Overall, I think Andrew Jackson’s presidency wasn’t that bad nor that good due to how he handled some issues. Andrew Jackson wasn’t that bad a person as people may think, he was even nicknamed, “a man of the people”. He had gotten this nickname for letting the people be heard, Andrew Jackson grew up like a “normal” person.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson had become the seventh president of the United States after a close election in 1824, where John Quincy Adams had become president because of a deal that was made in the House of Representatives. Eventually in 1828 Andrew Jackson had gotten elected, but this was because he had gotten the support of farmers and merchants, since he announced that he planned to destroy the national bank. In his presidency, Andrew Jackson did many things, like mistreating Native Americans, and eventually dealing with the Nullification crisis after it caused a lot of damage. In my opinion, Andrew Jackson’s presidency was not a good one. Andrew Jackson might be seen as, “A man of the people”, but I don’t think so.

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

This is proved in Source #4 where Jackson says the following, “...the farmers, mechanics, and laborers - who have neither the time nor the means of securing like [money] favors to themselves - have a right to complain of the injustice of their government.” This quote may not have many words, but it has a lot of meaning. First off, Jackson looks at the lower people because he knows what it feels like. He knows how hard it is to make a living when money is low. He cared about his people, the rich and the poor.

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

This was five years of the First National Banks charter had expired. The bank allowed less debt to be owed in the United States. But Jackson decided that the National Bank was unconstitutional and did not follow the lines of the constitution. Therefore President Jackson decided that he would cancel the National Bank. This meant that there would be more debt put onto our government and our taxes would increase.

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

But at the time Jackson's position on the Bank was not antagonistic. He was concerned about the Bank's constitutionality and the general stability of paper money in place of gold and silver. But soon after that happened Jackson started to dislike the bank even more. He started by doing strong attacks against the Bank in the press. Then Jackson vetoed the Bank Recharter Bill.

Read More
561 Words | 3 Pages

During the trial of Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokee tribe and proved that Jackson was in fact wrong. Jackson refused to follow the court system and still removed the Cherokee tribe. Jackson was an ignorant and very selfish man. Secondly, The Nullification of South Carolina was a very selfish time for Jackson. He fought for what he wanted, not for what was right.

Read More
1141 Words | 5 Pages

Jackson disliked the National Bank because he believed it would “make the rich richer and the potent more powerful” (Jackson). Jackson also was not fond of the idea that a quarter of bank stocks were held by foreign investors, leading them to be successful based off the bank’s success, not Americans. Last, Jackson deemed the National Bank unconstitutional. Jackson concocted a plan to destroy the bank which consisted of Jackson ordering his Secretary of Treasury to withdraw all the money from the bank and putting it into State “Pet” Banks. With the National Bank in loss of money, they recalled the loans, but the people who withdrew the loan were not in the financial place to repay the money quite yet.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

national bank. As Jacksons term continued, he truly grew a desire to crush the Second Bank of the United states. Over time Jackson decided that it could not continue how it was, and that it did not want warrant reform, it must be destroyed. Jacksons reason for this conclusion was a result of his past financial problems, his views on states’ rights, and his tennesse roots. The Second Bank centralized financial might, jeopardizing economic stability; it served as a monopoly on fiscal policy, but it did not answer to anyone within the government.

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson was said to be one of the worst presidents in the United States. He made some bad choices during his presidential years, which lead to him being capitalized as a monarch or a king. With the United States’ history with kings that was not a good thing. Jackson was very stubborn and strong willed, he didn’t take no for an answer. Being strong willed is normally a good thing in certain situations, but in Jacksons situation it was not.

Read More

More about Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

Open Document