Ronald Chilton’s Deposition Summary Ronald Chilton serves at the President and CEO of National Trench Safety Consolidated Holdings, National Trench Safety, LLC, National Trench Safety Manufacturing and Engineering, and NTS Mikedon. NTS Consolidated is the holding company above National Trench Safety, LLC. National Trench Safety, LLC is the wholly owned subsidiary of NTS Mikedon. NTS Manufacturing and Engineering is a wholly owned subsidiary of NTS, Mikedon LLC. NTS Mikedon rented the equipment to Elliott Construction for the College Station project.
At approximately 2143 Shift Supervisor Justin Riddle responded to a Code Red in the Central Services building. Upon arrival Riddle met with a Casper Police officer and began a floor by floor search. The problem was found on the first floor in the area commonly called the dock. The sprinkler sytem had malfunctioned and had flooded the area upon arrival. Shortly thereafter Fire Department arrived.
Athletic Director Bob Marcus has quite the challenge in allocating the athletic department funds appropriately throughout all the programs within Oakbend Senior High School. After critically analyzing the case study it was quite clear some sports such as football and girls basketball received much more funding compared to other sports such as cross country and track and field. Throughout this case brief an effective solution that is both fair and in line with the districts mission will be expanded on to assist Bob Marcus is making the necessary budget cuts to provide a successful athletic program in the future. Marcus needs to cut about $80,000 from the previous budget plan to accommodate the funding cuts made by the school.
Yesterday, Sloan Jackson, age 18 was put on trial for stealing a shirt from Famous Fashions in Merchandise Mall. He supposedly ran out of the store with a lump (which was the same color as the stolen shirt) in his jacket to go to Record Mart because there was a big sale going on. He then was found sitting next to the yogurt stand and the shirt was found in a trash barrel near the yogurt stand. He then ran away from the security guard but he was in the end caught and brought back to the store to return the shirt. At the trial yesterday the jury came to a verdict of being guilty after talking in the jury room for about 10 minutes.
Murder mystery of Robert Eric Wone in 2006 There is an unsolved murder case of Robert Eric Wone who was murdered on 2nd August 2006 in Washington D.C. His body was found in the house of his college friend. Mr. Wone was a lawyer by profession and according to the affidavits filed by the police he was believed to have been incapacitated, restrained and assaulted sexually before death. Moreover the crime scene had been tampered with.
On December 28th, 2010 a member of the Aryan Brotherhood was sentenced to an outstanding 450 month prison term in Crane, Texas (ABC15, 2016). To further put this court decision into perspective, 26 year old Steven Scott Cantrell was fated to servfe a 37.5 year sentence that would result in him being released after he is well into his mid-60s. Cantrell was found guilty for hate crime charges that stemmed from a series of racially-motivated arsons in December 2010. He was involved in setting fire to a historic African-American church and the attempted murder of a disabled black man (ABC15, 2016).
“The Innocence Project is a national litigation and public policy organization dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted individuals through DNA testing and reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice.” The mission of the Innocence Project is to exonerate people who they believe don’t belong in jail and aren’t guilty of the crime they were convicted for. People write to them asking for them to investigate on difference cases and they will evaluate potential cases by gathering information about each case application and see if they can determine whether DNA testing can be conducted. Christopher Abernathy was one of the many people who they successfully exonerated. Christopher was convicted for murder, rape, and robbery.
In the court case, Gil vs Whitford, the major concerns of this particular case was gerrymandering. Gerrymandering, is to favor one party or class by manipulating the boundaries of those involved in the electoral constituent. This case first arose in the year 2011; in Wisconsin. In the state of Wisconsin, two republicans were elected in the states assembly and senate. Soon after that, the redirecting plan began to take place.
In the Military he served three overseas tours, and toward the later part of his military career he oversaw recruiting in parts of Tennessee, Virginia, and Kentucky. While I was interviewing the Mayor, he noted that being Mayor is very similar to being in the Military. In the Military you will work with people you do not like or agree with, but at there are some things you can find common ground on, and in county government there are commissioners who did not support him, but they can all agree that they want a better Campbell County, and eventually they find common ground on something, whether that be roads or
I chose to write about James "Honest Dick" Tate. His is a story not many people know about but it is one of the biggest financial scandals ever to hit Kentucky politics. In 1848 at the age of seventeen Tate began working as a clerk in the post office in Frankfort Kentucky and his political career would start six years later when he was appointed by the Governor of Kentucky to the position of Secretary of State. In 1867 Tate ran under the Democratic party for position of Kentucky state treasurer, he won the election and would continue as treasurer of the next twenty-one years. During his time in office Tate had the trust and respect of many fellow politicians which allowed much of his work in the Treasurery to go unnoticed and unquestioned hence the name "Honest Dick".
One man waiting outside the building for his daughter during the San Bernardino shooting. She worked inside of the building, which was on lockdown during the shooting. She had sent her father a text message to let him know what was going on. Terry 's Pettit, who is the woman 's father, continued to wait on the scene. He wanted to get more information from his daughter.
For example, according to Parliament of Canada, this service enacted by Diefenbaker was extremely important when it states, "In 1964, the Royal Commission on Health Services, ...recommended that the federal government establish a public medical care insurance plan similar... In response to the report of the Hall Commission, the federal government introduced in 1966 the Medical Care Act,..." (http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/SEN/Committee/371/soci/rep/repintmar01-e.htm). ANALYSIS John Diefenbaker initiated the Royal Commission by going to the monarch to request information about laws pertaining to medicine. He believed that something was not right in the system and decided to do something about it.
On Friday, 9-11-2015, at approximately 0140hrs, I interviewed Richard McPheter at the Western Reception Diagnostic Correctional Center in St. Joseph, Missouri. Richard McPheter was read his right agreeing to talk. Richard McPheter advised he stole nothing from Ginger Billups. Richard McPheter advised Ginger Billups wanted him to take her debit card to get cash out to buy her some meth. Richard McPheter advised that Ginger Billups let him use her Craftsman riding lawn mower to get her meth.
We have learned that Oliver Cowdery and Emma Smith were very unhappy with Joseph Smith for his involvement with 16 year old Fannie Alger. Cowdery termed it “a dirty nasty filthy business” and eventually left the church over this among other things. We know Joseph Smith violated the word of wisdom until the day he died. He was not wearing temple garments at the time of his death. He killed two people and seriously wounded another at Carthage jail where he was killed himself.
The way we determine if someone is mentally insane began with the M 'Naghten case (1843) which developed the first test to determine if the defendant is insane. It set the standard that the jury has to decide if the defendant is insane only after hearing a medical testimony from the prosecution and defense experts. The rule created the presumption of sanity, unless the defense proved "at the time of committing the act, the accused was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing or, if he did know it, that he did not know what he was doing was wrong" (Francone, 2016). They will be deemed insane only if they were found incapable of knowing what they were doing
