Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.Animal testing is a cruel and inhumane way to obtain research and knowledge. Animals can be very different from humans leaving researchers with poor test results. Animal experimentation is no longer necessary for research because of the abundance of solutions and alternatives to solve this issue and keep animals away from harm. For years, many people have been trying to control the amount of animal experimentation that's going on in society and its finally starting to pay off. Dr. Barnard shares “When I was in medical school at The George Washington University our instructor announced that the next week would include ‘dog lab,’” says Dr. Barnard. “That

This article states that “Today, interactive and programmable simulators and other methods are considered superior to animal-based education because they are modeled after the human body and allow for repeated practice.” ( “The End of Animal Laboratories in Medical Student Education”) every day people have been coming up with new technology to use instead of animal experiments. these ways are proven to be more efficient than animals because they can simulate exactly what the human body looks rather than animals have a different internal complex than humans. “Johns Hopkins University founds the Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT).” (“Animal Rights Timeline”) People are realizing that the need to change to make a better future. Johns Hopkins took a big step forward with founding this organization and leaving the old routine of animal testing behind. Despite criticism, Paul Jurkowski says “I graduated from Jefferson Medical College in 1982. There were four or five of us who refused to kill a beagle to learn principles of cardiac function. It never hurt my studies or my career. It was a horrible tragedy in my mind to kill all of those sweet creatures for something that could have been taught in other ways,” says Paul Jurkowski, M.D.” ( “The End of Animal Laboratories in Medical Student Education”) Unlike many other unfortunate people Jurkowski was not affected by his decisions to side with a few others and not kill the beagle. He was lucky because in other situations someone could have lost their job or their right to be in that class because they refused with what was going on. He also reinstates that there are alternatives to animal research and he has a right to disagree with this