ipl-logo

Animal Rights: Multiple Christian And Non-Christian Views

840 Words4 Pages

INTRODUCTION
Throughout society, animal rights have been a controversial topic with both sides having passionate and complex arguments. Christianity has influenced both viewpoints greatly. This presentation will discuss what animal rights are, multiple Christian and non-Christian perspectives and my personal opinion on the ethical issue.

In order to develop an educated opinion on the matter, we must first see the reasoning behind the dilemma. This footage illustrates the conditions and processes in order to create animal products. These are all standard practices in the meat, dairy and egg industries and the abuse and violence towards the animals are still legal. Recently, more mainstream attention has been brought to the cruelty behind …show more content…

It clearly implies that humans should not abstain from certain foods as God has given them to us to enjoy and be thankful for. God’s creation is good; therefore, we should not reject it. This same approach can be applied to a vegan lifestyle. Animals are God’s creatures that we should protect and be thankful for, something impossible to do whilst killing and eating them. Also, this scripture could also be seen as taken out of historical context. This because Paul the author of the book of Timothy was writing to Timothy and the Ephesian church specifically. At the time, Gnostics who believed the body was evil and only the spirit was good were gaining popularity. This extreme teaching often included fasting, abstinence of various foods, and even harming of their own bodies. Thus Paul taught that God created our bodies and everything with love therefore, we should not harm …show more content…

It means that those who are kind to animals, are good people. Being kind to animals would therefore subtract them from one’s diet. Another notable verse is Genesis 1: 29-30 which describes the Garden of Eden – a place with no sin, to have a vegan lifestyle. God intended for us to eat plants and grains and to care for the animals. In the prophesy of Isaiah, God shows his intention for everyone to become vegan and peaceful. Even the lions will eat like cows. As it is no longer necessary to eat animals, the choice to move to a vegan diet is one that shows kindness and compassion. A possible grey area would be killing in order to survive. Although this is something not relatable to us now, in the past killing animals in order to survive is something that would challenge the plant based

Show More
Related

Analysis Of Lois Frazier's A Change Of Heart About Animals

426 Words | 2 Pages

If the vegan or vegetarian does not eat a balanced diet, it can result in the inability to develop sufficient immunity cells from certain viruses and decrease in production of nail, hair, and skin cells. This is the first sign of malnutrition. Although, animals are an important part of our ecosystem, they are a food source in many parts of the world. To question Frazier’s ideas, would not a carnivorous animal eat you if given the chance? It is society 's obligation to treat everything and everyone with dignity and compassion.

Read More

Norcross Argument Essay: Don T Eat Factory Farm Animals

654 Words | 3 Pages

However, animals (video, chicken, and beef) they all still suffer at the hands of somebody else farming animals for their meat, with that being said you still need me proteins in your diet to be healthy. With Norcross objections, everything comes out between A and B if A good, and condemns A and if not A condemns be so of course this undermines his argument. With the second objection is that many consumers are unaware of the treatment of animals to retrieve the meat that we as humans eat.

Read More

Similarities Between Utilitarianism And Animal Rights

269 Words | 2 Pages

For vegetarians, animal rights should trump human rights. In “Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Animal Rights,” Tom Regan defines animal rights as “the natural right to life” (307). Similar to Regan, many vegetarians believe that animals have rights and deserve to have their best interests taken into consideration, regardless of whether they are useful to humans. By switching to a plant-base diet, people will be able to alleviate the needless suffering and deaths of countless animals. Besides, in the same article, Regan also suggests “to treat animals in a more humane manner” (308).

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Factory Farming By Matthew Scully

1104 Words | 5 Pages

To begin, when talking about animals it can be a very sensitive subject mainly because the way animals are treated on farms, and how no one feels the need to question these actions. This is because many people feel this issue doesn’t concern them. In this essay Matthew Scully discusses the issue on how animals are treated and how they should be given more respect, and attention. Matthew Scully argues that animals in these factory farms are wrongfully treated, he uses biblical references and addresses the morals of humans to get conservatives to act on this matter.

Read More

Safran Foer's 'Let Them Eat Dog'

327 Words | 2 Pages

His actual goal is for not to eat meat for all animals is just smart and useful as pet as dog. We shouldn’t eat other animal and not the other. With the argument and knowing that he is a vegetarian I felt as if he wants us all to be vegetarian too. 3. Safran

Read More

Factory Farm Why Should We Condemn Fred

154 Words | 1 Pages

The passage is saying that we should treat the animals that we normally eat just like we treat puppies, which are normally treated like family. Morality comes into play and presents that if we don’t torture puppies for our eating pleasures then we should not support factory farms since they torture animals, which end up being eaten for our pleasure. The author is unable to find a morally relevant difference between Fred and people who eat factory raised meat, at least ones that consume the meat that know what the animals have endured to end up on their plates. The passage relates greatly to the view of the author. The author explained that if we condemn Fred’s behavior, which was only to heighten his gustatory experience then shouldn’t we condemn

Read More

Summary Of Animal Liberation By Michael Pollan

264 Words | 2 Pages

In Michael Pollan’s article, he addresses the topic as to whether or not it is morally right to consume animals. Pollan’s opinion towards consuming animals is pretty explicit in the beginning. He saw no harm in consuming animals, but his opinion started to change after reading Peter Singer’s book, “Animal Liberation”. While reading through the book, Pollan learns that eating animals, wearing animals, experimenting on animals, and killing animals for clothing are all viewed as “speciesism”. He quotes, “speciesism”- a neologism I had encountered before only in jokes- as a form of discrimination as indefensible as racism or anti-Semitism”.

Read More

Peter Singer What Does It Mean To Eat Ethically

1147 Words | 5 Pages

While some authors will agree that eating meat is unethical, others will have a difference in opinion. According to “Equality for Animals?” author Peter Singer, when we consume meat we disregard the rights of the animals for our own interest and consumption. He believes in equality for animals and even goes as far to mention that if animals counted in their own right, then the way in which we use them would become questionable. He states, “One problem is, of course, that using them for food involves killing” (Singer 214).

Read More

Machan's Arguments Against Animal Rights

1408 Words | 6 Pages

One topic that many scholars are debating right now is the topic of animal rights. The questions are, on what basis are rights given, and do animals possess rights? Two prominent scholars, Tom Regan and Tibor Machan, each give compelling arguments about animal rights, Regan for them and Machan against them. Machan makes the sharp statement, “Animals have no rights need no liberation” (Machan, p. 480). This statement was made in direct opposition to Regan who says, “Reason compels us to recognize the equal inherent value of these animals and, with this, their equal right to be treated with respect” (Regan, p. 477).

Read More

Does The Torah Hold The Idea That Shechita Is Inhumane?

592 Words | 3 Pages

This commandment reflects the Torah’s view that animals

Read More

Tom Regan's Argument For Animal Rights

655 Words | 3 Pages

I will argue in favor of Regan’s principle that non-human animals should have moral rights. Tom Regan, a famous philosopher, proposed the idea “that animals have rights based on their inherent value as experiencing subjects of life” (Regan). For thousands of years, animals have been used for as pets, food, and labor. Throughout the past century, many philosophers, including Regan, have raised arguments on how we, as humans, are treating animals poorly.

Read More

Persuasive Speech On Veganism

1103 Words | 5 Pages

But if you love and want to help animals, it really does benefit being vegan. There is no difference between a cow and a dog. The only difference is your perspective. Your egg carton or mayonnaise jar may tell you that they came from “free-range chickens”. Your meat supplying grocery store may tell you that the flesh of the animal you are eating

Read More

Persuasive Speech On Animal Rights

1889 Words | 8 Pages

“In 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimated that Americans ate an average of 54.3 pounds of beef, 92.1 pounds of chicken, and 50.4 pounds of pork, per person, per year” (Vegetarianism). Food production counts for only one of the many injustices animals face daily. Although they have been proven emotionally intelligent, mankind views these entities as subservient and continue to harm them. People around the world have created organizations that work to ameliorate the treatment of animals. As the animal rights movement nobly fights to improve the conditions of these living creatures, daily human activities and the moral values of some prolong the acceptance of animal equality.

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Eating Meat

1421 Words | 6 Pages

Eating meat is beneficial to humanity, because they provide nourishment that cannot be obtained from other sources. Without the support of animals, humans lack a distinctive diet, that is essential to their well-being. However, since animals are so important to the diet, they deserve great care and respect as well. Humans were always hunters and gathers. They always knew that meat was a big source of protein that helped keep them going(Araki).

Read More

The Moral Basis Of Vegetarianism Analysis

1570 Words | 7 Pages

In Philip Devine 's "The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism," he, as mentioned in the title, addresses the moral aspect of consuming animal products. In short, the article is a detailed analysis of the arguments of vegetarians. Devine writes that there are two distinct groups of vegetarians: the ones who are against the suffering of animals and the ones who are against the killing of animals. The side against animal suffering will object to eat any animal product; for example, mother cows go through extreme pain when separated from their calves, so, these vegetarians would refuse to consume milk and other dairy products. The side that is against the killing of creatures will simply refrain from eating meat.

Read More

More about Animal Rights: Multiple Christian And Non-Christian Views

Related Topics

Open Document