What Is Being Done to Stop Unnecessary Animal Testing? In the United States, animal testing is a contentious issue. It presents a difficult moral and practical position. The issue raises the question of whether animals ought to be protected or whether it should not be changed.
Numerous animals are utilized for entertainment, fashion, and scientific advancement at the moment. However, testing can save lives for scientists and other experimenters. Additionally, big brands heavily rely on animal testing to obtain product approval.
I discovered through extensive research that there is little oversight of animal testing. The government passed the Animal Welfare Act to limit the use of animals in testing and the procedures associated with it. I
…show more content…
Everything was allowed as long as you had a license and were registered with the USDA, according to the laws. That raises the question of how the government determines what constitutes "necessity" and what does not.
The rules and procedures that must be followed to keep everything on track are not explained in detail in the government documents. The documents emphasize that all licensed facilities must listen to the Secretary, who responds to questions and concerns.
Dogs and cats were the only animals specifically mentioned. When they are mentioned in the official documents, none of the other animals that are currently being tested, such as rabbits, rats, mice, fish, hamsters, guinea pigs, and birds, etc., are acknowledged. This means that there are no limitations on what researchers can do with those animals.
On the one hand, there are animal rights advocates who recognize the problem of animal cruelty and the immediate need to end all animal testing. On the other hand, there are businesses, brands, and research facilities that see this as a way to save lives and do not see any other
…show more content…
They claim to be free of cruelty. However, their suppliers are contributing to the company's overall success by participating in animal testing. By requiring a certain grade of a product, which most of the time passes through animal testing, governments are adding to this pressure.
The USDA wants to keep doing what they're doing while also making people happy. During my research, I discovered that the USDA has endorsed and modified the Animal Welfare Act. As secretary of the USDA, Thomas J. Vilsack has assisted in reassessing the requirements of individuals, businesses, and research facilities and making any necessary adjustments.
However, the agricultural practices and consumer vs. producer needs were the primary focus of the amendments to these documents. It rarely made any changes to the rights of animals or how animal testing was done. It didn't go into any more detail about how to teach the animals or take care of them. In addition, there was no mention of new and improved alternatives in the amendments. Because it is the most reasonable use of the resources at their disposal and the best option that has been presented to them, Thomas J. Vilsack and the USDA are content in their current