ipl-logo

Annotated Bibliography: Restoring Free Speech And Liberty On Campus

727 Words3 Pages

Sasha-Gayle Simpson ENC 1101 Professor Leivers 19 September 2014 Annotated Bibliography Downs, Donald Alexander. Restoring Free Speech and Liberty on Campus. Oakland, CA: Independent Institute, 2005. Print. This book talks about a major quandary in now a days American higher institution of learning: deprivations of free verbalization, due process, and other rudimentary civil liberties in the denomination of favored political causes. Downs commences by analyzing the nature and evolution of the quandary, and discusses how these apostasies of liberty have harmed the truth seeking mission of universities. Downs commences by scrutinizing the nature and evolution of the quandary, and discusses how these apostasies of liberty have harmed the truth seeking mission of universities. Rather than promoting equal reverence and tolerance of diversity, policies …show more content…

Such forms of kinetics have established unexpected achiever in renewing the principles of free address, academician liberation, and civil liberty at universities where they have been active. Jackson, Robyn Renee. Never Work Harder than Your Students & Other Principles of Great Teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2009. Print. "In Never Work Harder Than Your Students, Robyn Jackson makes a radical assertion: Any pedagogia can become a master edifier by developing a master edifier mindset. The master pedagogia mindset can be achieved by rigorously applying seven principles to your edification until they become your automatic replication to students in the classroom. The more you exercise these seven principles, the more you commence to cerebrate like a master edifier: 1. Start where your students are; 2. Know where your students are going; 3. Expect to get your students to

Show More
Related
481 Words | 2 Pages

Following this public speech qualified as disruptive, vulgar and obscene, according to the school’s rules, Fraser will be suspended for two days and his name will be removed from a graduation ceremony speakers’ list. Based on these aforementioned facts, Fraser’s father, supported the American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU) will file a lawsuit against the school for violating the First Amendment right to freedom of speech of his son, Matthew Fraser, and will ask for a monetary reparation against the prejudice. As a consequence of this lawsuit, the issue will be discussed, first, before a Federal District Court. Over there, the judge will give a verdict favorable to Fraser on the ground that the

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

Charles R. Lawrence III is a professor at Georgetown University that publicized an article inside “The Chronicle of Higher Education” and later on in the “Duke Law Journal” which was headlined “On Racist Speech”. Ever since Charles Lawrence was young he was quite the anarchist on the matter of the first amendment protecting racial slurs. He encourages University’s to stand up and reprimand such absurd speech with a reinforced approach without completely throwing out the first amendments rights. Charles Lawrence uses Brown v. the board of education as an example, the discrimination is causing psychological effects that are turning an educational environment into an environment of destruction. As he then goes on to explain that if racial speech

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

In Derek Bok’s, Protecting Freedom of Expression On The Campus, he brings light to the issue of censorship in universities. He states that students at Harvard University got offended after a few students displayed the confederate flag. There have been many cases in which people have tried to censor offensive material however; the Supreme Court preferred to conserve the freedom of expression. He believes that if censorship starts to take place, it will be difficult to know when to cross the line. In addition, it will not fix the initial problem since the offenders will continue to abuse others using different means.

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

By writing “when the ideas, values, and speech of the other side are seen not just as wrong but as willfully aggressive toward innocent victims, it is hard to imagine the kind of mutual respect, negotiation, and compromise that are needed to make politics a positive-sum game”, the authors exhibit their feelings that perceiving differing opinions as aggressive is the wrong viewpoint. Connecting the disputes at college campuses to affecting politics develops a pressing feeling that something needs to change. Many people may view the culture at universities as something that doesn’t affect them or matter, and the writers of this article hope and try to change this outlook by constantly referencing how the increased amount of coddling and protectiveness will poorly affect the future of the students as well as the

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Government Regulation: The Frist Amendment & College Campuses Without a doubt college campuses attract a number of different groups. Many advocates, religious groups, hate groups, and individuals come to college campuses in hopes of expressing their opinion to impressionable college students. Under the First Amendment of the United States the Federal Government (and as applied to state governments under the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause) the freedom of speech and religions is freely allowed to expressed without restraint by the federal government. Again, everyone has a first amendment right to free speech. First Amendment issues constantly arise on college campuses, but free speech on college campuses have long been a medium in young

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

For centuries, the first amendment has protected each citizen across the nation to be able to express themselves freely. However, there comes a time when this right is not protected and occasionally the individual can be faced with consequences. This typically occurs in a learning facility or a place of business. Outrage has ensued because some believe that these facilities are too limiting when it comes to the first amendment right; thus making a mockery of it. Nevertheless, the limits exist for a reason; they exist to limit harassment and to uphold moral conduct.

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

Vindictive protectiveness is stopping students from learning anything in the four years or more that they spend in college. If they aren’t allowed to speak their mind there is no room for growth. The only thing they are learning is that speech should be under strict control by authorities. Thus teaching them that there really is no freedom of speech under the first

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

We go on about our day, not realizing how much freedom we truly have. As Americans, we never have to fear persecution for speaking out against our elected government officials. We can vote for who we want, practice our faith, and come and go as we please from across the country. However, can the same be said for the youth of America, specifically students of American high schools? In her article "Freedom of Speech v. Civility," I argue that Ann Wallace Scott employs logical reasoning to prompt a more profound conversation among students about the boundaries of free speech and other rights within American high schools.

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

Political conservatives in America vastly hold true the original traditions and freedoms in America and rarely compromise with change. One such prominent conservative, John W. Whitehead, in his essay, “The Schools Are Destroying Freedom of Speech,” argues that the modern day public educational system has inflicted unconstitutional restrictions of freedom on its students. Throughout his essay, Whitehead attempts to build his credibility by utilizing the Bill of Rights and different examples to appeal to the ethos, logos, and pathos aspects of his audience – the American citizens; however, Whitehead’s apparent bias, shown through his strong conservative values and passionate tone, causes him to disregard the deeper meaning of the educational

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

It is important to let people express their views and discuss disagreements; that’s what democracy is. Being able to express your views and opinions is what makes America different from other countries. So why wouldn’t we allow these same rights on a college campus? Wendy Kaminer says in her essay Progressive Ideas Have Killed Free Speech on Campus, “It’s not just rape that some women on campus fear: It’s the discussions of rape.” She then goes on to talk about a university that canceled a discussion about rape because students felt like it made an unsafe environment.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

1st Amendment and the College Campus Have you ever wondered why some college campus protests are shutdown even though the first amendment is in place? The first amendment does not always protect in every situation. The first amendment wasn’t enforced much until the 1960’s and 70’s, when the anti-war and gender equality protests first started. College campuses have a right to impede on the first amendment if it is restricting someone else’s rights. In many cases some protesters will block off an entrance to an event or will start to harass people walking past.

Read More
631 Words | 3 Pages

The increase in college students feeling inhibited from expressing their thoughts and ideas on campus, as noted in Anne Dennon's article, underscores the importance of fostering an environment where political correctness enables individuals to feel safe and respected when sharing diverse

Read More
1197 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court has been entrusted with the task of interpreting the Constitution of the United States. In the First Amendment of the Constitution, freedom of speech serves as the foundational liberty which is the cornerstone to the practice of democracy. Commencing at the early part of the twentieth century cases such as Schenck v. United States, Debs v. United States, Abrams v United States, Whitney v. California, and Dennis v. United States, paved the way for the Court to set the legal standard for defining protected and unprotected speech. Nonetheless, the Court has struggled to interpret said boundaries property and has failed to protect speech in some of the above cases. This essay will analyze two different scenarios where the Court

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

The use of ‘bastions of unbridled inquiry and expression’ (774) creates an image of a fortified and well-defended area that in this case was a safe place to explore possibilities and voice one's opinions. To have in the same sentence ‘..repress free speech as any other institution in young people’s lives’ Immediately takes what may have looked like something promising and turns it into yet another governed establishment that is more interested in total compliance than individual creativity. Speech codes were birthed in the 1980s as the result of ‘political correctness’ melding with the concerns of the somewhat controversial ‘nonfaculty campus administrators.’ Lukianoff’s explanation about why these stringent codes violate the constitutional right to freedom of speech is sharply defined with the phrase ‘...well intended but, outside of the ivory tower…’ (774) Ivory tower meaning a state of seclusion from the facts of the real world.

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

The idea of free speech on college campuses and the complications of it stem from those on campuses expressing views that don’t align with popular views. Implications for students who use the idea of free speech as a method for hateful actions and comments should be reprimanded, but the question remains as to whether schools should enforce tougher limitations. The freedom of speech on college campus expands to the freedoms of religion, assembly, press, and protest as well. Freedom of expression allows students to show their own political, social, and cultural views. Removing freedoms of speech and expression have consequences deeper than surface issues.

Read More

More about Annotated Bibliography: Restoring Free Speech And Liberty On Campus

Related Topics

Open Document