ipl-logo

Anselm's Argument In Proving The Existence Of God

1524 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Anselm's Ontological Argument for the existence of God

Can we know whether God exists, or doesn 't exist, just by looking at the definition of ‘God’? Why, or why not?

The question being asked here is whether a priori (or non-empirical) definitions are enough to prove the existence of God. Within this essay, I aim to prove that just because a definition exists in theory, it does not mean that they necessarily exist in our world, and that arguments providing a definition do not prove God’s existence. I will focus on Anselm’s argument to prove this, as I believe this is the most interesting and influential definition argument with reference to the question.

To begin this essay, I shall introduce the idea of what definition arguments aim to do. A definition argument is a priori, which means that …show more content…

Therefore, premise iii. is flawed as you can not say that something is better if it exists, if existence is not a trait. I would agree with this, and I would put forward that existence as a concept is completely different from having a certain colour of hair, or personality trait. If one says something exists, they are not giving a trait to such object, but instead stating that it is a thing that has a place in the world. I would personally not say that if something exists that it is changed as to how it was before, whereas a trait such as colour changes the objects form. Referring back to Kant’s argument, he therefore suggests that if existence is not a trait (or existing in reality is better than not), then it is not possible to compare an existing God with a non existing God, because they are completely different concepts [Schonfeld 2000: 297]. Furthermore, Kant goes on to offer further criticism through stating God’s …show more content…

I would agree with this, and state that instead of targeting the actual definition of God, Anselm does not offer a solid definition to God, and instead creates a supposition (that something that exists in reality is better than something that only exists in the mind) which he uses simply to define God into existence. I would say that to all things that exist in reality are better than that only exist in the mind. For example, if a man had a plot to commit suicide, but was not able to do it in reality, then it is better for the idea to be in his mind than in reality. With this in mind, I believe that premise iii of Anselm’s ontological argument commits the fallacy of presumption, that something that exists in reality is not always better than something that exists as only an idea. With this in mind, I would therefore say that Anselm’s argument is not sound, and that this critique has disproven that a definition is enough to prove God’s

Show More
Related
458 Words | 2 Pages

What phrase does Anselm use to designate God? Explain why he formulates his designation in this way. Do you think this is an appropriate way to speak of God? The Phrase he used was “God is that than which no greater can be conceived”. There are two reasons as to why Anselm words this the way he does, reason one is the idea that “ no greater can be conceived” he doesn’t want you to be able to think about something greater hence the idea that no greater can be thought of by a person.

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

The ontological argument states that perfection is a part of the concept of God, and that perfection entails existence, and so the concept of God entails God’s existence. However, it can be argued that if God is an infinite goodness, then its contrary, evil, should not exist. Alas, there is evil in the world, and, therefore, God cannot exist. The ontological argument also seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of concept alone. Pascal’s Wager attempts to justify the belief in God with an

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

Hume (textbook, p. 305) develops, in detail, what is presumably the most grounded contention against the presence of God in a valid deductive argument. He states, “Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then is he impotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then is he malevolent.

Read More
2086 Words | 9 Pages

These three philosophers Anselm, Guanilo along with Thomas Aquinas present their arguments describing the existence of God, but not everyone would agree with their views. One philosopher Thomas Aquinas gives the better

Read More
453 Words | 2 Pages

In other words, Anselm argued that if one can conceive a being that possesses all perfections, it is greater for that being to exist in reality rather than just in the mind. Therefore, with God being defined as the greatest conceivable being, He must exist in reality to solidify the definition. Anselm's argument relied on the concept of God being a necessary being, which is a being whose nonexistence is logically impossible. According to Anselm, if God’s nonexistence is a possibility, then He would not be the greatest conceivable being.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

Questioning if God is not omnipotent, the entire idea of God creating the world can be called into question. Another issue is that if it is said that God is no longer entirely good there is the possibility to say that God has evil or bad intentions, and we should denounce him. Lastly, if one says that evil does not exist, then there is no possible way to separate those people who are considered to be deviants of society. This would mean that those who commit crimes that are evil in nature like murder and rape would be considered to be normal and acceptable.

Read More
1377 Words | 6 Pages

Anselm’s argument is based on this known definition of the concept of God alone. Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is based on his foundation of knowledge, logic. Humans have the idea in their minds of infinite perfection. Humans also have the idea of themselves as inferior to this idea as imperfect. For humans to have the idea of infinite perfection, there must be truth in the reason for them having this idea.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

The opportunity of God can be infinitely small, but is multiplied by infinity, also derived infinity. The chance that God does not exist is greater, but equals to zero if multiplied by zero. Therefore, the choice of believing that God exists would win. And the contrary is that the choice of God does not exist. It is a choice that would lose.

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

I. BRIEF SUMMARY This article is an examination of the divine sovereignty/free will tension that exists and the appeals to paradox/reason that have developed from this tension. Specifically the author examined the epistemic and logical positions within the paradox camp as well as the libertarian and compatibilist positions within the reason camp. The author summarized that the pursuit of solution to the tension is a valid one. II.

Read More
382 Words | 2 Pages

According to the text book, Anselm’s conception of God was the ontological argument that “being than which nothing greater can be conceived.” If God doesn’t exist, there could be something imagined that is greater than God, an existent greatest being, but this being would be God. Anselm proof of God’s existence by saying " the being than which no greater can be conceived" is impossible to understand. There is no clear and distinct idea of a "being than which no greater can be conceived." He also said that, even a fool is convinced that something exists in the understanding that which nothing greater can be conceived.

Read More
1411 Words | 6 Pages

Thomas Aquinas is the second critique of Anselm’s position. Take note that Aquinas assumed that the existence of God is obvious. He supported cosmological argument to prove that God exists. The cosmological argument uses the physical things that exist in the universe to demonstrate God’s existence. In his criticism of Anselm’s argument, Aquinas disagrees with the use of the word “God” and argues only some who hear the word “God” understands what it means (Himma, 4).

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

St. Anselm and Descartes are known for presenting the first ontological arguments on the existence of God. The word ontological is a compound word derived from ‘ont’ which means exists or being and ‘–ology’ which means the study of. Even though Anselm and Descartes’ arguments differ slightly, they both stem from the same reasoning. Unlike the other two arguments on God’s existence (teleological and cosmological), the ontological argument does not seek to use any empirical evidence but rather concentrates on pure reason. The rationale behind this school of thought

Read More
1187 Words | 5 Pages

Who made the world we live in? This question has been debated for thousand of years and it is been the main fuel in many philosophers work. The Teleological Argument for God's Existence also known as the argument from design; it is the argument that our world and the universe surrounding it are complex that it was not created by accident, it was however designed by a intelligent designer. In 1802, William Paley created his analogical version of the teleological argument using an analogy of a watch. According to Ernest Nagel, Teleological argument is based on empirical evidence.

Read More
1440 Words | 6 Pages

Philosophy of Religion Most of us opt for certainty in all things. In most of our endeavor we strive for certainty. In this quest for finding certainty we seek reasons to warrant our claims by way of establishing logical and reasonable basis for believing on something. In matters of our religious beliefs specifically on the existence of God we likewise seek reasons behind such belief.

Read More

More about Anselm's Argument In Proving The Existence Of God

Related Topics

Open Document