ipl-logo

Archer Case

1619 Words7 Pages

The Crime, Case, and Outcome
The victim, M.G., testified that, on March 1, 1989, she went to Carteret Park in Glen Ridge, New Jersey to play basketball. While she was shooting baskets, she was greeted by the defendants, Christopher Archer, Paul Archer, Bryant Grober, Peter Quigley, who she knew since grade school. Grober told M.G. that she would be able to go out with Paul, if she went with them to Kevin and Kyle Scherzers’ basement. While on their way to the Scherzers’ house, Christopher Archer put his arm around M.G.; she thought of this as romantic. When she arrived, she sat on the couch with Grober. One witness called by the defense and three by the State, all testified that M.G. offered Grober a blowjob, performed it, and that Grober issued …show more content…

Dr. Susan Esquilin, a psychologist specializing in sexual abuse, observed that M.G. was at a high risk of victimization because “she was so focused on what somebody else wants and needs and not what she feels she wants or needs … she’s like to do what anybody asks her to do.” To M.G. her sexuality was primarily the way of her pleasing others. Dr. Gerald Meyerhoff, a psychiatrist specializing in children and mental retardation, diagnosed that M.G. was mildly-mentally retarded with ADHD. He said she was at times sexually aggressive to fulfill a friendship. He believed she can lie and being deceptive and did not believe she had post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD,) or rape trauma syndrome (RTS.) On the other hand, Dr. Ann Burgess who specialized in rape trauma, does believe that M.G. has RTS. Burgess used an event drawing series to evaluate M.G., and it was used to get visual and verbal information in a non-leading fashion. Unfortunately for the defense, they missed the deadlines to have their psychiatrist question M.G. in rebuttal to the State’s expert. Dr. Burgess’ testimony and ability to testify on certain subjects are very controversial in court systems, which will later be explained. (State v. Scherzer, …show more content…

The expert testimony of RTS is tough to use in court proceedings; it depends on the purpose of the testimony to see if it’s admissible or not. When it comes to experts testifying on the matter, there’s two purposes; the first one being to educate jurors on sexual assault victim’s reactions, and the second purpose is to correct any misconceptions or rape myths about sexual assault. Sometimes when victims exhibit different, odd behaviors, an RTS psychological expert can explain it. (Costanzo & Krauss,

Show More
Related
544 Words | 3 Pages

Somehow, her husband found out about the affair and notified her supervisors that she had been raped. Chief Seegmiller conducted an investigation and realized that the affair was consensual and she received no punishment for her actions. This angered her husband, so he made another false allegation. This time he said that Johnson and Chief Seegmiller were involved in an affair together.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

During his study, he maintained scientific objectivity in his observations, interpretations and recording as he witnessed the students tell the horrors of their childhoods and the horrendous acts that brought the students to the Giddings juvenile facility. The treatment they were going through was called “psychodrama” or

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

This finding proved that while Jennifer swore it was Ronald based on his appearance, it is not. Additionally, there is the fact that there was suspect bias represented in Jennifer choosing Ronald and continuing to believe that it was Ronald behind the crime even when evidence proved otherwise. So, eliminating as much suspect bias would have made an exponential difference in identifying the correct person. There are issues with relying on eyewitness testimonies, especially when it comes to a traumatic event such as sexual violence. Specifically stated by Smith and Hattery (2011) is that almost all wrongful convictions from other studies were resulting from the lack of reliability with eyewitness testimonies.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

The pathologist identified bruises on Rust’s knuckles that were consistent with having hit Lavallee. Miller had the doctor “confirm that Battered Woman Syndrome is not a psychiatric term”(Sheehy, 2014, 22). One of Miller’s strategies was to get Lavallee to testify on grounds that if she did not, the defense would be “introducing medical and psychiatric evidence without an evidentiary foundation”(Sheehy, 2014, 33). Nonetheless, the judge decided Lavallee was not required to testify so Miller went on to persistently try to get Dr.Dirks to state that one emergency visit a year is normal. Miller continuously tried to suggest that Lavallee’s injuries could have been caused by anyone, not just Rust because her injuries were quite often ‘singular’.

Read More
2380 Words | 10 Pages

During the fall of 1993, Shirley Crook’s, a loving mother and wife, life was horribly cut short in one of the most horrific ways possible, drowning. Seventeen year old, Christopher Simmons, wrapped his victim in duct tape and electrical cords and drowned her in a river with help from his accomplices John Tessmer and Christopher Benjamin. He attempted to burglarize the Crooks residence along with his accomplices, and he only murdered Mrs. Crooks because ‘the bitch seen my face’ (State v. Simmons). He “assured his friends that their status as juveniles would allow them to ‘get away with it.’... Brian Moomey, a 29-year-old convicted felon who allowed neighborhood teens to "hang out" at his home.

Read More
1372 Words | 6 Pages

She also says that “every time he came home, I was afraid there would be a beating” and that “he beat [her] at least once a week, although sometimes often more than that”. This shows the commonness and regularity of the abuse. Although it could be helpful to show the jury the severity of the abuse, I would not pressure her to discuss it because it’s likely uncomfortable for her and she would obviously not want to talk about her abuse to strangers. She also can provide another element to battered woman syndrome in that Mr. Stephens would force isolation between Ms. Stephens and her family and friends. In her affidavit she explains that Mr. Stephens would not allow her to have anything to do with her family and even put a lock on the phone to prevent her from calling them.

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

One of the largest criminal cases of arsenic poisoning in recent history was that carried out by Amy Archer Gilligan. Amy owned her own nursing home in Windsor, Connecticut from 1907 where in total there would be 60 deaths at the residence between the years 1907 and 1917. In 1897, Amy had married James Archer and it was in 1907 they decided to purchase the nursing home in Windsor. A few years later in 1910, Amy’s husband James died of at the time was apparently thought to be of natural causes, but it was officially put down that he had died of kidney disease. It was known that a few weeks before his death, a large insurance policy was taken out on him, yet at the time no one thought this to be suspicious.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

To convince the judge to take the possibility of death row out, Ridgway would provide as much evidence and details as possible to help locate all of his victims (Paulson). Ridgway was able to convince the judge to rule death row out. He helped authorities find victims' bodies that had not yet been located (“Gary Ridgway”). Along with helping the authorities, Ridgway also agreed to allow all found victims in the Seattle area- that did not have a suspect- to be associated with his murder and become one of his victims without any evidence (Paulson). Throughout his trial, Ridgway pleaded guilty to the murders of forty-eight young women in the Seattle-Tacoma area.

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

In the year 1997, a man named Vanhoose was shot four times for refusing to give a robber money from his store. The culprit then fled the crime scene and jumped into the passenger’s seat of a car while taking off his mask. Numerous witnesses saw this criminal leave the crime scene, including a woman who later identified a seventeen year old named Ryan Matthews as the gunman. Furthermore, even Ryan Matthews' friend, Travis Hayes, eventually confessed to the crime of driving Matthews away from the crime scene (Ryan Matthews n.d). Although, the fact is worth mentioning that Hayes, and Mathews as well, suffered from some sort of learning disability, so Hayes' confession may have not been by his own volition (University of Michigan Law School 2023).

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

However, this story of Mrs. Stephens being helpless is all the defense has. But how can you, the jury, believe a story from a woman that would lie to doctors, to police,

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

The reasoning that forensic psychiatry methods are questioned is due to inconsistent analysis, and even though scientifically grounded it does not fit the Daubert Standard requirements (Westfall 2013). Due to these issues, the trial courts have to determine if the evidence presented by a forensic psychiatrist is a) legitimate b) the expert’s testimony fits within the scope of forensic psychiatry, and c) properly relies on principles involved in the field (Westfall 2013). Once those inquiries are answered, is when the expert testimony is accepted as evidence (Westfall

Read More
1526 Words | 7 Pages

After the assault, Shepard made efforts to pursue treatment for his trauma, but experienced severe depression, flashbacks, paranoia,

Read More
1969 Words | 8 Pages

Forensic psychologists will help create a criminal profile through the use of interviews and assessments to understand the victim or the possible offender. This allows for a better understanding of the individual and for the offender to be brought to justice (Godwin et al., 2001). Courts have relied on forensic assessments of offenders or witnesses in order to make sound decisions (Nicholson & Norwood, 2000). Overall, this episode was able to demonstrate the flaws of polygraphs, illustrate an interview, and depict a false rape allegation despite the reasoning behind the action. Forensic psychologists play a role in the criminal justice to reach an end goal and was demonstrated in this episode of Lie to

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

However, because their meetings were brief, they rarely got very far. Progress was also slowed by the patient becoming tight lipped when discussing certain topics, especially immediate family. Dr. Reiner would never figure out the reason for this. They would not know each other long enough to get in to such details. But in due time his patient would confide in him why she had never sought counsel before: several ancestors from her father 's side were labelled insane.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Although the film did a great job portraying PTSD, it still had its flaws. For instance, Angela scheduled her patients back to back, which is something psychologists should never do. The reason is because it exposes patients to others and invades their privacy. Some people may not want others to know they have visited a psychologist. In the film, Alan Johnson takes Charlie Fineman to go see Angela and on the way out they see one of Mr. Johnson’s patients, Ms. Remar.

Read More

More about Archer Case

Related Topics

Open Document