ipl-logo

How Can Lie To Me Be Used In Forensic Psychology

1969 Words8 Pages

Lie to Me was a crime drama series that aired from 2009-2011 (2009) and is currently on the streaming service Hulu. This crime drama involves psychologists Dr. Cal Lightman and Dr. Gillian Foster. They focus on micro expressions that is based on the science from Paul Eckman. The content of this analysis will focus on Season 1 episode 2 titled Moral Waiver. Throughout this episode assessments, polygraph tests, rape allegations, and ethics are used to illustrate how these aspects can be used in forensic psychology. In the beginning of this episode, Homeland security is testing a handheld polygraph machine in an interrogation room. They wanted Dr. Lightman to test out the device and for him to give his input on the device given his knowledge …show more content…

Lightman and Torres realizes that Private Rebecca Metz went AWOL after serving with Sergeant Scott and her transfer request was denied. Dr. Lightman and Torres travel to Baltimore she has family and finds Metz has been living with her grandfather. She reveals she was the real rape victim. Specialist Lake told the story of the rape to get Sergeant Scott arrested. De Zutter et al., 2017, explains the main reasons why an individual would lie about rape. One of the main reasons is revenge. In this episode, it can be argued that Specialist Lake was lying about the rape for revenge because she was angry at Sergeant Scott for raping Private Metz and wanted him to be arrested for it, so she claimed that she was raped instead. The role of a forensic psychologist would be able to analyze Sheila Lake’s story and Private Metz’s story to be able to understand who was truly raped and why Specialist Lake lied. This is also a prime example of ethics that took place in this …show more content…

Forensic psychologists will help create a criminal profile through the use of interviews and assessments to understand the victim or the possible offender. This allows for a better understanding of the individual and for the offender to be brought to justice (Godwin et al., 2001). Courts have relied on forensic assessments of offenders or witnesses in order to make sound decisions (Nicholson & Norwood, 2000). Overall, this episode was able to demonstrate the flaws of polygraphs, illustrate an interview, and depict a false rape allegation despite the reasoning behind the action. Forensic psychologists play a role in the criminal justice to reach an end goal and was demonstrated in this episode of Lie to

Show More
Related

Case Study: Strickland V. Washington

1778 Words | 8 Pages

He also spoke on the phone with respondent’s wife and mother. He attempted once, unsuccessfully to meet with them; however, he did not follow up a second time. Additionally, the counsel did not seek out additional character witnesses for respondent. The counsel’s conversations with his client led him to believe he did not need to request a psychiatric examination because he did not believe the respondent had psychological problems. In a state of hopelessness, the counsel decided not to present nor look for further evidence concerning respondent’s character and emotional state, because he believed it would not overcome the evidentiary effect of the respondent’s confessions to the crimes.

Read More

Analysis Of Beau Donaldson's Tolerance For The Rape Of Allison Huguet

527 Words | 3 Pages

Before the sentence was finalized, witnesses from both Donaldson’s side and Huguet’ side took the stand to be questioned. During the questioning process, Hillary McLaughlin, another one of Donaldson’s victims, decided to testify. Though she didn’t want to be placed back into the situation again she knew it was the right thing to be done. As person after person was brought up and asked a numerous questions, Donaldson was shown to be nothing but a liar during the entire case. Before the hearing three different psychologists was ordered to execute a psychosexual evaluation on Donaldson.

Read More

US 304 Atkins Vs. Virginia (2002)

1099 Words | 5 Pages

A properly trained Forensic Psychologist is needed to make a proper evaluation of a potentially insane defendant in any case where insanity is suspected. This is a necessary area of specialty for psychology, leading to the formation of Forensic Psychologists, because of the demand for such evaluations. This case is significant because it led to the formation of a niche for psychologists to specialize in. Competency evaluations for insanity are a big part of legal cases because of this case pertaining to potentially insane defendants. There are several crimes where an evaluator is needed to decipher the competence of whether an individual is insane because the insanity plea has become a common one.

Read More

Central Park Jogger Case Study

482 Words | 2 Pages

In the Central Park jogger case: The boys were told that hairs linked them to the victim’s body, which turned out not to be true. Interrogators are encouraged to falsely tell suspects they believe them to be guilty, and that another suspect or physical evidence has implicated them. Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau’s report supporting reversal of the convictions reveals other troubling aspect of the five suspects’ confessions-besides investigator’s lies that physical evidence linked the boys to the victim’s

Read More

Competency Restoration Case Study

1019 Words | 5 Pages

The legal guideline aims to remind psychologists about their primary obligations as well as rational “precautions to respect the confidentiality rights of those with whom they work or consult, recognizing that confidentiality may be established by law, institutional rules, or professional or scientific relationships.” Maintaining privacy and confidentiality of the defendant facilitate their openness assisting them to recall and relate “pertinent facts and events, including his motives and actions at the time of the offense, and be able to testify in his behalf and to challenge prosecution witnesses.”

Read More

Biases In The Cosby Case Steven T. O Neil

1737 Words | 7 Pages

The possible biases in jury decision-making will be discussed, including those related to having a celebrity on trial. In addition, this paper will examine the taboo nature of sexual assault cases, the problems that often arise in such cases, and the psychological toll on the victim. One issue with this case is the prosecution’s lack forensic evidence. In a “he said, she said” case that lacks the evidence that jurors expect in order to make their decision, it comes down to whether they believe the defendant or the prosecution. When DNA is not available, other types of physical evidence are examined (LaPorte, G., Nguyen, M., Schwarting, D., Scott, F., Waltke, H., Weiss, D., 2017).

Read More

Legal Issues Involved In The Norfolk Four Cases

936 Words | 4 Pages

PAPER 1: FALSE CONFESSION ASSIGNMENT Legal issues involved in the interrogation of criminal suspects are the leading cause for wrongful conviction of innocent individuals based off of false confessions. The primary motive for police officials is to close a case with a written and verbal confession from a possible suspect. Confessions override evidence if the confession is convincing enough to the jurors. Most people assume that people would not confess to a crime they didn’t commit, but due to the harsh interrogation circumstances, psychological coercion and situation factors, these can influence an innocent individual to confess to a crime they didn’t commit.

Read More

Critical Evaluation Of Court Case Regarding Commonwealth Of Virginia Against Richard Allen

701 Words | 3 Pages

Critical Evaluation of Court Case Kwame Danquah Argosy University Professional & Ethical Issues in Forensic Psych FP6500 Dr. Cronin, Christopher December 6th, 2017 Expert Witnesses and Ethics In the case regarding Commonwealth of Virginia against Richard Allen, two licensed psychologists Dr. Boggio and Dr. Foley were referenced as expert witnesses. Dr. Boggio gave his testimony based on the mandated tests and interviewing the defendant Richard Allen. He seems to have a deeper psychological insight and exclusive knowledge about Allen. Several ethical aspects can be drawn from Dr. Boggio’s testimony about the defendant.

Read More

Jennifer Thompson Eyewitness Testimony

467 Words | 2 Pages

She “studied every detail on the rapist’s face. [She] looked at his hairline; [she] looked for scars, for tattoos, for anything that would help [her] identify him” (New York Times). She put so much effort to stay conscious and study this much detail of her attacker, yet when Bobby Poole stood in front of her in the courthouse, she did not recognize him claiming “that she’s never seen that man before in her life”. This shows that there are other contributing factors that could lead a witness to misidentify an attacker and that even the “best” eyewitnesses are not perfect. Thompson shared the statistic that eyewitness error is the leading cause of wrongful convictions in America.

Read More

Archer Case

1619 Words | 7 Pages

The expert testimony of RTS is tough to use in court proceedings; it depends on the purpose of the testimony to see if it’s admissible or not. When it comes to experts testifying on the matter, there’s two purposes; the first one being to educate jurors on sexual assault victim’s reactions, and the second purpose is to correct any misconceptions or rape myths about sexual assault. Sometimes when victims exhibit different, odd behaviors, an RTS psychological expert can explain it. (Costanzo & Krauss,

Read More

Overview Of The Queensland Jury Act 1995

1254 Words | 6 Pages

In rape cases specifically, a sexual assault forensic exam can be performed on the victim and examined by the forensic examiners to assure the rape did occur. An inclusion of psychologists would lower the bias of the jury as psychologists are educated on the trauma experienced by rape victims and do not have the same negative attitude towards rape victims as many citizens have. A study from 2007 regarding jury accuracy shows how negatively the legislation can also affect the defendant, as juries gave the wrong verdict approximately one in eight times (Tremmel,

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Jonathan Edwards

673 Words | 3 Pages

Puritans believed that God chose a few people for salvation and that schools should be teaching reading, writing and arithmetic. This sermon was spoken by Jonathan Edwards where he spoke out to his congregation in Massachusetts. Jonathan Edwards made it clear that the non-believers of God would be sent to the fiery pits of hell. Jonathan Edwards uses Rhetorical Appeals, Tone, and Figurative Language to expose his attitude towards “sinners” as not worthy in the eyes of God. Jonathan Edwards applies Rhetorical Appeals with pathos, logos, and ethos to develop fear in the audience.

Read More

False Confessions In West Of Memphis

803 Words | 4 Pages

The aspect of psychology and law research from this week is correlated to the week four-course material is most relevant to the topic of interrogations and false confession techniques that are used by the detectives. In the case that was presented in the documentary West of Memphis is an investigation of a failure of justice in Arkansas. The interrogation methods from the detectives lead to a false confession. A false confession is an admission to a criminal act that the confessor did not commit (Greene & Heilbrun, 2014, p. 165).

Read More

Criminal Justice Psychologist

554 Words | 3 Pages

Criminal Justice Psychologist The psychologist is a vital asset to the criminal justice system. The psychologist can examine victims, police officials and various witnesses thus making them ethically obligated to make the right decisions and evaluations. This essay will discuss the roles of psychologist as they work within the criminal justice system. I will Identify and describe the psychologists’ roles within the criminal justice system as it pertains to the applied scientist, the basic scientist, the policy evaluator, and the advocate.

Read More

The Importance Of Lying In The Police Department

673 Words | 3 Pages

Truthfulness gets continuation and lying activates the conscience. An officer of the law is supposed to have strong ethical indicative of moral beliefs. These beliefs are absolutely essential for any law enforcement officer. Aristotle suggests, "life circumstances trigger a natural range of responses that includes a mean between excessive and defective responses” (Dempsey & Forst, 2016, p.227). A person’s character traits are the individual’s habitual ways of responding, and individuals who are the most admirable are those who find the norm between the two extremes regularly.

Read More

More about How Can Lie To Me Be Used In Forensic Psychology

Related Topics

Open Document