Throughout history, hysteria and aberration have contributed to events in which justice was not necessarily reached. In the early 1940s, the American government relocated and confined those of Japanese descent in response to growing fear that they may potentially assist their native country in an attack on America after the Pearl Harbor attack. Similarly, in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, a multitude of innocent people were accused of and convicted for witchcraft due to their abnormality in the strict Puritan society and the greedy nature of their neighbors. The unfair and The Japanese internment and relocation has significant similarities to the 1692 Salem Witch Trials.
Prior to Pearl Harbor, Japan was determined to set a status as a great
…show more content…
At the time of the order, the nation was devastated by the attack on Pearl Harbor and citizens feared another attack was imminent. Many people believed that the Japanese Americans were still loyal to Japan and would act as spies despite the fact that almost two-thirds of the internees were United States citizens. While moving to the camps, the internees were only allowed to carry bedding, toiletries and clothing with them. They could only bring whatever they could carry themselves. The Japanese did not know where they were going or for how long they would be …show more content…
United States case that the Executive Order 9066 was constitutional, stating that the need to act against espionage outweighed the individual rights of the Japanese Americans. The court found that curfews places on the Japanese Americans was constitutional during wartime. Mitsuye Endo was the only woman to have an Executive Order case reach the supreme court. The case was ruled in her favor but only following Public Proclamation 21 which allowed Japanese American’s in the West Coast again. Just like the United States government ruled that the need to protect its citizens was more important than protecting certain liberties, the court in Salem in 1692 also convicted suspected witches based on the mere possibility that they may be dangerous, even though there had been no proof that would be considered tangible or logical in modern