ipl-logo

Argument Against Euthanasia In Canada

755 Words4 Pages

Euthanasia In Canada
Life is held dear to the healthy and happy but, to the terminally ill it is a life sentence. It is often said that hospitals, families, and caregivers will go the extra mile to ensure terminally ill patients live the rest of their lives comfortably, but to refuse the choice of assisted suicide is all too common. Euthanasia is a complex and controversial topic that has been debated for years. Recently, Canada has allowed patients with life-long illnesses/disabilities to choose to have the right to assisted suicide.
The Toronto Star reports over 200 Canadian choosing to end their lives legally. Colin Perkel reports that approximately 87 people in Ontario, 66 in British Columbia, 23 in Alberta and 12 in Manitoba, with the other provinces and territories inconclusive. Perkel highlights the flaws in the system, as there are many factors do not get counted; Provinces are not properly recording their data, Patients who request assistance, but are refused, patients who die before their legal death, patients who change their minds are all not recorded. Due to this the system data is not as reliable as the government would like. As the controversial topic is brought up on the different coasts, many places of …show more content…

Deontology states that the moral thing centres the concepts of duty; which means that a person must follow the moral laws regardless of the situation. Due to the fact that euthanasia, is helping someone kill themselves, the doctor is considered unethical as they have committed murder. Although the death was predetermined with both the patient and the doctor, and rigorous protocol was covered, the doctor still has no moral right to take away the patient's life. There is a possibility that the patient could find happiness later in life, and by assisting them in suicide the doctor is murdering their potential second chance. Thus making providing and assisting euthanasia

Open Document