ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: Choosing Gun Control In The United States

1739 Words7 Pages

Choosing Gun Control In recent years, there have been many mass shootings around the United States. These mass shootings have brought up many debates on whether or not guns should be taken away completely. While some people believe in taking away guns, others believe they need guns to protect themselves. Also, people believe there should be more restrictions for buying guns. Gun control needs stronger restrictions but does not need to go to such extremes of taking away guns from those who respect the Second Amendment. In 1791, the Bill of Rights included the Second Amendment which gave American citizens the right to keep and bear arms. This amendment brought gun control and gun rights along with it. Gun control are the laws that regulate the sale, use, etc. of guns, while gun rights are the American citizens’ freedoms to keep or bear arms. Many gun laws have been passed since 1791. These laws restrict buying guns in …show more content…

These people believe in having stronger restrictions on guns. According to Smith, “Another poll by the Pew Research Center found that 83 percent of Democrats and 81 percent of Republicans support background checks for all gun purchases” (1). Stronger restrictions are like deeper background checks on the gun buyer just to see if they have a criminal record or if they are mentally insane. Ponnuru said, “A CBS/ New York Times poll found that 26 percent of the public, a minority not much larger than the one that wants to ban handguns, thinks that ‘stricter gun control’ would ‘help a lot’ to stop gun violence” (1). Even though there are not many people that want stricter gun laws, stricter gun laws would help in many ways for there to be a stop in gun violence. With stricter background checks many groups of people that are not suppose to have guns right now will be checked and will not be able to get guns anymore. This will stop from having a lot of mass

Show More
Related
1721 Words | 7 Pages

Gun control has been a hot topic for a very long time. Within the Bill of Rights there are the ten most important amendments to the United States Constitution. Among these is the second amendment, in which it is stated that, “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, should not be infringed. ”(Kates, 2005, pp.12) Guns are part of every citizen’s daily life.

Read More
1445 Words | 6 Pages

The Second Amendment states, “The right of people to bear arms” meaning that anyone that wants to own a gun can and if there protecting themselves they can shot someone. More gun control means less deaths in America, if the government was more stricker there would be less deaths. Some laws that should be put in place are, hunters safety required until 18 years

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

The debate on gun control is a hot topic in Washington today. Democrats fight for more restrictive measures while Republicans feel that citizens of this country have a right to bear arms. After all mass shootings, Democrats usually are vociferous in demanding that there should be more gun restrictions, and the Republicans just deny that the problem is with the guns and make ludicrous excuses. These excuses usually are very persuading, but aren’t factual whatsoever.

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

Covert action developed as a staple in US statecraft in response to the spread of Soviet influence during the Cold War. This response led to the creation of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 1947 to conduct all covert action for the US. The CIA remained the sole government entity allowed to conduct covert action until 2003 when President George W. Bush authorized the military special forces to use this capability. Civil liberty and other non-interventionist proponents have argued that the US cannot and should not use covert action because the secretive nature of this activity runs counter to the American values of openness and transparency in government–citizen relations.

Read More
1184 Words | 5 Pages

Over the course of many years, Gun Control has been the issue of debate for many people. Some say "Yes, let's ban all guns!" While others say "No way, you can’t take all the weapons away from me!" Furthermore, we have those in the middle, who want more control, but don't want guns taken away completely.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

While there are many great claims both for and against gun control, much of the controversy could be resolved if their were more reliable and in depth background checks, those found eligible could possess guns for the purposes of hunting and/or personal protection, and through implementation of regulations to limit the maximum number of guns that an individual would be able to own. People that are pro gun rights, such as the National Rifle Association, Gun Owners of America, and the Second Amendment Foundation have great arguments to support their side in the gun control controversy. A great example of this is the fact that gun control laws will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Reasoning behind this statement is simple, criminals are called

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

Laws supporting gun control take away the American people's rights and freedoms. By the right of the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, we have the ability to own guns. Luke Scott, a famous American athlete and advocate against gun control says, “Gun control means control. It means control for the government and the government starts controlling the

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

Gun ownership, by and large, these people are peace-loving and most guns are owned by law-abiding citizens and are used carefully. Anti-gun control groups point out that the legislation is violating the constitutional right just trying to protect themselves. Restricting guns to reduce crime is similar as banning alcohol to prevent drunk driving. Indeed, persuasive evidence shows that civilian gun ownership can be a powerful deterrent to crime.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

Gun control has been going on for around for years. Gun control laws should be more enacted in the United States of America since citizens are having the potential of using the weapon as violence throughout the community or state and or the country. The 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution state that the second amendment states “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Which was adapted in in December 15,1791 the purpose of the second amendment was that the government would not make a tyrannical government.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

Gun Control Gun control over the years has been a controversial subject, with people arguing for both sides. The 2nd amendment states that everyone in the U.S. has a right to bear arms. Mass shootings and suicides by firearm have been a growing concern for many people living in the U.S. Numerous people making the argument that there should be more gun control. Having gun control would help lessen the deaths by firearms in the country for a variety of reasons.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

People who are in support of guns are mistaken to generally side with the side of law that advocates purchasing guns and utilizing them in situations that they see fit. “Gun control is a social regulatory policy that involves specific rules and sanctions that have a direct and concrete impact on individuals” (Wolpert and Gimpe, 241l). Even though people may be pro-guns, they also know that what is best for society is best for them. “…empirical research reveals that self-interest exerts little influence on mass preferences” (Wolpert and Gimpel,

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

There are two sides to the gun control issue, the people that want some weapons banned because they believe that doing so will help stop mass shootings and other firearm related deaths, and the opposition, which believes that the Second Amendment cannot and should not be infringed,

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

For example, when perpetrators use high capacity magazines or assault weapons, it results in 47% more deaths (Everytown Research). Not allowing these high powering magazines to be sold or having higher regulations to who they are sold to, can decrease mass shootings. This would result in a safer environment. Similarly, bettering the control of who the guns are being sold to would prevent the guns from getting in the hands of the wrong people. For instance, requiring yearly background checks for anyone who purchases any type of gun would add more control to these weapons being in the proper hands.

Read More
1856 Words | 8 Pages

Even though they believe there is a need for some guns, they still think there are too many guns and some need to be banned. They insist on there being background

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: Choosing Gun Control In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document