ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Mass Shootings

802 Words4 Pages

Finial Draft In the world of today many citizens are involved in a mass shooting, and these mass shooting areas are mostly gun free zone an example would be a school. When a mass shooting occurs many of these citizens are disarmed. These citizens' fate all depends on how fast the law enforcements arrives at the scene. Why risk waiting when you can just eliminate the threat right then and there? If the area was a gun free zone the citizens would be defense less. These helpless citizens can only rely on their hand to hand combat skills to stop the threat. This is why we shouldn't ban guns or put any restriction on the gun because, it is in our bill of rights, will create an unbalanced power between the government, many citizens without guns …show more content…

When the government, The British, came into our territory back during the Revolutionary War many citizens were armed ready to defend themselves. Though when the British came the British army started to take away the people's guns! This created the opportunity for the British army to take control over the citizens. People may also say that our founding fathers created this amendment back when people had muskets. This is not the reason why we created the amendment because if we still used muskets that would create an unbalanced power between the government and the people. Also our founding fathers recognized this problem, so they added the second amendment to protect ourselves from the unjust government and criminals. Now people may say that our founding fathers also put the second amendment just because people needed to hunt, but this is not true. If our founding fathers created this amendment they should have known that guns would technologically advance as time when on. Even if the government manages to ban guns it would just make things worst! During the 1920s the consumption of alcohol was illegal. This lead too many problems like the speakeasy. This also strengthen the power of some major gangs. Now if we apply the same concept but replace the alcohol with our guns that would be total chaos. Gangs would be powerful with many weapons they buy illegally. Criminals would not obey the law and would just rob “good” citizens without getting

Show More
Related
1615 Words | 7 Pages

When the original people wrote the amendments they had no clue the advancement of guns that would come in the future ( ). In the end, no guns should be carried around like

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

The thought process behind this is that it will help prevent shootings and keep criminals and mentally ill people from getting guns. Other people want to maintain this right and not be limited. They think that having guns will allow them to protect themselves from criminals and the rise of a tyrannical government. The Second Amendment was adopted into the United States Constitution on December 15, 1791, along with the other amendments in the Bill of

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Us americans don't need to “bear arms.” Some may say that many people use them to hunt but there are many other weapons you can use to hunt with as well as protecting yourself from danger. By having the second amendment, it gives criminals the right to go out and harm people, whether it be a family member, friend, someone you walk past. Statistics say that “The U.S. has an estimated 283 million guns in civilian hands.

Read More
561 Words | 3 Pages

The second amendment from the Constitution gives the right of the people to bear arms and protect themselves. Although guns were very different back then, it doesn’t change the fact that the people should be able to protect themselves with weapons. Government shouldn’t be able to take away our freedoms, and the right to bear arms is one of those freedoms we have. The reason why we are a free country is because the colonies in the Revolutionary took up arms and revolted against their tyrannical King. Taking our second amendment would leave us defenceless and a government with power can take advantage of this and why we can’t revise the

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

In the constitution it states, that its our right to bear arms. Were allowed to keep guns in our possession for fun or just protection. 59% of homes in america have a firearm which can be stolen from other people and soon your guns will become a part of illegal gun trafficking. When gun control laws came in affect gun crime spiked to 89% or 18 million cases for gun

Read More
1618 Words | 7 Pages

Civilian firearms are for recreational activities such as hunting or shooting sports and self-defense (Cicconet, “Semi-automatic weapons unnecessary, unsafe in civilian hands”). The question on what to do about America’s gun control becomes the limelight of the stage every time national tragedy involving gun violence happens. According to Fred A. Roff Jr., president of the Colt Patent Fire Arms Co., he said, “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” (E8). This is irrelevant in many ways. Many gun advocates question how banning the use of guns for the civilians in U.S. would help protect the civilians when there are so many other forms of weapons that can replace guns (Adcock, “Harvard study reveals gun control counterproductive).

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

Over the years, school safety has become more of an issue in the United States. Many have argued over the possible solutions for school safety. But through all the others, the only feasible solution is the use of metal detectors. Metal detectors have been known to increase safety when placed in an area that could be threatened. Metal detectors can protect schools from violence, especially from school shootings.

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” In this statement that Jefferson had made, it is important to be able to protect yourself from whatever may come your way. People should be able to rely on a

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

Government can avoid hindering its own actions to protect the homeland by building trust and setting proper expectations with civilians. To develop a comprehensive homeland security strategy, however, Washington should place greater emphasis on developing adequate societal resilience” (Flynn, 2011). One of the best ways to do this is to have the private sector more involved, and if the federal government gets rid of strict gun laws. Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws and there are more murders there than anywhere else in the United States. This is because those who wish to do harm do not follow the law and obtain guns and use them for harm while the law abiding citizens follow the law and do not have guns to protect themselves.

Read More
1208 Words | 5 Pages

Although the second amendment states all americans have the right to bear arms crime statistics show that we need tighter gun control to lessen the widespread shootings. Gun violence has existed in america

Read More
1666 Words | 7 Pages

The United States of America, a great but very flawed nation is one of the highest-ranking countries in the world—which isn’t always a good thing. From its number one rating in areas like defense spending (almost half a trillion dollars in 2015 according to data from the National Priorities Project), to its astronomical and ever rising national debt (which increases $40,000 a second (The Telegraph))—America consistently comes out on top. Although rankings like these are upsetting to hear, the most frustrating is the fact that this country outranks every other nation in the world in guns, mass shootings, and gun violence. So far, there have been nearly 1,600 mass shootings since one of the most horrific shootings in modern history at Sandy

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

Without the second amendment, the Federal government would have all the power. Their military would be the only ones with guns, and the people wouldn’t have any way to defend themselves or fight back. The right is that we have the right to use guns for hunting, and protecting oneself. Some people say that we don’t need the amendment because it doesn’t apply to our modern culture. But we do need it because we’ve seen around the world nations where the people rise up against their tyrannical government – like the Arab Spring of 2010.

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

The constitutions second amendment gave citizens the right to own and bear arms. It is evident that the founding fathers never intended on taking guns away. It was such an important freedom that they made it second on the bill of rights. The founding fathers made the constitution to protect people from what is thought to be good intentions.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

There is an estimation that about half of the households in the United States owns at least one gun. As such many people can have access to guns, including children and other family members. Many school based attacks involve young people carrying guns owned by their parents and going on a rage through schools and other places. Similarly, the ease of acquiring guns has led to vulnerable deaths of people across the country. Moreover, this leads obsessed people to escape their frustrations on minorities by murdering and threatening them.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

To begin with, the second amendment of the US constitution gives citizens the right to carry or possess a gun. As a result, gun violence in America has increased drastically over the years due to guns being utilised in a reprehensible manner and people getting wedged in the crossfire, hence why stringent law enforcements need to be put in place regarding guns in the US. “Since 1982, there have been at least 61 mass murders carried out with firearms; in most cases, the killers had obtained their weapons legally”.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Mass Shootings

Related Topics

Open Document