ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: The Chicago 8 Trial

1645 Words7 Pages

Emma Smallcomb
Professor Prewitt
Term Paper
2 July 2023

The Chicago 8 Trial opened September 24, 1969. Eight men were accused by the United States government of conspiring to initiate a riot at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago Illinois (The Chicago 8 Trial, An Account). The Chicago 8 Trial was “as one commentator suggested, “a monumental non-event”” (The Chicago 8 Trial, An Account). The Chicago 8 trial was a disastrous trial with eight men who were carless and disrespectful, a judge that was biased, as well as the First Amendment rights being overlooked. Many would say this federal act was triggered by one of the most disastrous wars in the United States history, the Vietnam War. It wasn’t just that though, there was …show more content…

Julius Hoffman was an average white male, conservative, middle aged, as well as middle-class. Julius Hoffman was to soon be the Judge of this trial. It is only imaginable that this was a culture class with the defendants, as previously mentioned, waiting to happen. Not to mention the jury as well, which consisted of two white men, two black women, and eight white women (The Chicago 8 Trial, An Account). This jury will prove later that they were not in favor of the defendants. As far as the trial goes, if this even was a trial, it was only in the name. It seemed more like a comedic side show than anything. Taking into consideration that there was foolishness and childish behavior from these grown men everywhere and anywhere. “These defendants wouldn’t even stand up when the judge walked in; when there is no more respect we might as well give up the United States” (The Chicago 8 Trial, An Account). In the court room, these eight men were doing anything that they could to waste the time that they had in the court room. Even going as far as sleeping the time away. They were simply making a mockery of the trial. “Our strategy was to give Judge Hoffman a heart attack. We gave the court system a heart attack, which is even better”—Jerry Rubin (The Chicago 8 Trial, In Their Own Words). On top of this, Judge Hoffman had no shame in how he felt about the defendants and had zero effort to hide the dislike he had towards these men (The Chicago 8 Trial, Judge Julius Hoffman). The defendants didn’t make it easy for Judge Hoffman and Judge Hoffman gave it right back to them. It was all very back and forth between the defendants and

Show More
Related
683 Words | 3 Pages

How It All Began As the jurors step into the room, all 12 minds are set on the idea that without a doubt, the man in question has killed his father; all except one. More follow suit as the original mastermind stands up to the majority, and that majority soon becomes a minority. All endings do start with a beginning though, and that beginning is Juror Eight, who steps up to the challenge of becoming a justice seeker, and soon, others follow. In “Twelve Angry Men”, a play formed by Reginald Rose, Juror Eight is our shining protagonist, looking only to create fairness in the court of law.

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

Due to the high levels of publicity that surrounded this case, it was nearly impossible for the court to find a completely impartial and oblivious jury. Everyone in the surrounding area had knowledge of the atrocious way that these murders took place and many already strongly disliked Mr. Rolling. Police officers

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Although, he did fix his concentration on performing the perfect crime. Together, Leopold and Loeb murdered fourteen year old Bobby Frank. This goes down as one of the many of brutal murder scenes of the 1900s. If they wouldn’t have gotten the best lawyer in town, Clarence Darrow, it is more than likely that Leopold and his partner would have been hung instantly just as Dick and Perry were. Their attorney had such great points that were made, the judge only made them serve life in

Read More
1427 Words | 6 Pages

Once someone steps in the court room to oversee a trial of this caliber (or any caliber) they must not and will not let the media dictate their perspective of events. Scott Peterson’s jury saw the burden of proof provided by the prosecution and were left with no doubt in their minds by their own deductions he was guilty. The Casey Anthony jury on the other hand took all of the evidence into consideration, but they still were not completely convinced she was capable of the charges being filed against her, leaving them no other decision but to provide a not guilty

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

When looking at the detailed about this trial let’s examine the background of the defendants. In 1924 Nathan F. Leopold and Richard A. Loeb were charged with kidnapping and murder of 14-year-old victim who was a cousin of Loeb; Bobby franks. They were both sentenced to life imprisonment

Read More
1818 Words | 8 Pages

Clarence Darrow was a criminal defense lawyer who would be defending both Leopold and Loeb, he was famed and known for many things, “Victories in a series of spectacular trials, many of them desperate cases made him a national figure, especially his defense of Richard Loeb and Nathan Leopold in Chicago in 1924… By introducing psychiatric evidence, a novelty at the time, and invoking a sense of pity for the inscrutable human predicament, Darrow cast a spell over the courtroom” (Foner). A strong disbeliever in the death penalty, Darrow instructed Leopold and Loeb to plead ‘not guilty’ in order to avoid death row. They were both directed to plead they were mentally diseased, to which Darrow brought extensive psychiatric evidence, many mental ‘diseases’ of the time (emotional immaturity, alcohol abuse, glandular abnormalities, sexual longings, etc.) and even brought countless witnesses to attest to the mental ‘diseases’ of the two boys (User). Even though state issued psychiatrists saw normal emotional responses in both Leopold and Loeb and no physical bias for mental abnormality, two weeks later the judge announced his decision and sentenced the two 18 year old boys to life in prison instead of being put to death (User).

Read More
129 Words | 1 Pages

“Bobby Seale one of the “Chicago Eight” convicted of conspiring to violently disrupt the democratic national convention of 1968, was a codefendant in a Connecticut case charging murder of an alleged informer on the party”(The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia). The Democratic National

Read More
2075 Words | 9 Pages

Many still believed the five were guilty, including the officials on the case, so finalizing the case was very difficult. The officials continuously fought every proposed settlement and refused so many compromises. This caused the trial to go on for decades until a new mayor came into office and the case was finally settled (Finn 1). This trial only further caused emotional damage to the five men since they had to go through a rough trial for over a decade while continuously being accused of doing the crime even after being proven innocent. Additionally, the city of New York continued to deny any wrong doings and claimed the police and prosecutors were just doing their job (Weiser 1).

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

Read More
1966 Words | 8 Pages

The jurors responsibilities are to demonstrate their “American Loyalty” by acting as the criminal trials “True soldiers”. These various representatives must locate the defendant on one side of guilty, or innocent. Such is their duty to the state. This goes to show that no matter the feelings and opinions the trial must ultimately “prove” guilt or if proof is lacking assume innocence. In an Encyclopedia of American History (Richard B. Morris)(1953)(p.336) it is said that “It was charged by liberals and radicals in the U.S. and abroad that these two men are and were on trial because of and for their radical beliefs and view.

Read More
1060 Words | 5 Pages

The verdict of the Trial of the Chicago 7 was manipulated by society through propaganda, technology, and bias. The most impactful factor that influenced the verdict of the Trial of the Chicago 7 was propaganda. The Trial of the Chicago 7 was a battle fought mentally by the American people (Linder 1). While the case was focused on organized political protest and crime, the riot turned court case took place in 1968 and 1969 (Vile 2).

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

This process continues throughout the course of the movie, and each juror’s biases is slowly revealed. Earlier through the movie, it is already justifiable to label juror 10 as a bigoted racist as he reveals strong racist tendencies against the defendant, stating his only reason for voting guilty is the boy’s ethnicity and background. . Another interesting aspect of this 1957 film is the “reverse prejudice” portrayed by juror

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

If it wasn 't for Juror #8, I don 't know what terrible consequences would have been. Owing to his insistence, the case was discussed and everyone began to pay attention to the details of the case, testimony, evidence, and witness actions. In the end, twelve people overcame prejudice, ceased the conflict, and made the right decision. The play tells us that justice can be affected by prejudice very easily.

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

“I find it deeply upsetting when I see justice not being served. How do we as human beings deal with the unknown? The West Memphis Trial is a joke on so many different levels” - Atom Egoyan. The West Memphis Three case is one of the most famous trials ever as there was a documentary released covering the case. The documentary got nationwide attention and interest from celebrities like Johnny Depp, the most involved one of all.

Read More
1952 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction • As Atticus once said, “Our courts have their faults, as does any human institution, but in this country our courts are the great levelers, and in our courts all men are created equal” (Lee, 274). • Prejudice should not be present in court to ensure everyone is given an equal chance. • However, this failed to occur in the case of Leo Frank. The jury was unable to rise above social prejudice and see the case with an open mind.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: The Chicago 8 Trial

Related Topics

Open Document