Source analysis Freedom of French citizens can only be achieved when occasionally the death of a patriot or a tyrant has been accomplished, without this our country's freedom will not prosper. “The Tree of Liberty” can be defined as the rights and freedoms a citizen is given. The source in simple terms is basically saying without the blood shed of a few citizens from time to time a country can not have the rights and freedoms occur naturally. This source best fits into civic nationalism because it talks about the rights and responsibilities not being upheld without a military service, which covers all the criteria of civic nationalism. Thomas Jefferson has such an extremist view supporting civic nationalism, whereas someone like King Louis XVI would have had a completely opposite point of view that's against civic nationalism. I agree with the source because if people are not willing to give up their lives then the military would collapse and so would the country's safety. Therefore the loyalty of citizens …show more content…
Government services are provided in order to prevent chaos from occurring within the nation. Every so often when an attack or war breaks out, few from the nation's military will fall but not without reason, their death is what provides the hundreds of thousands of people freedom and more rights. Without the government providing education and protection services the country's national security would be at stake and the freedom would be limited. When we come across these types of interactions it's best to have allies with other nations from the help of our government in order to help protect French citizens who are innocent, and gain them more rights and freedoms. Since the main idea of the source is talking about bloodshed of a government provided service, it's there for a reason to help protect everybody but they can't do it without the help from French