Arguments Against Cloning Animals

528 Words3 Pages

Our argument is that we should support cloning of animals and endangered species. In my partner 's constructive speech, it brought up the fact that cloning animal models of diseases is very beneficial because then scientists can research about these diseases to make a treatment for it. Rather than using all this time for an animal to carry these diseases, in which that animal experiment may be unsuccessful. Therefore needing more time for another animal to carry that disease, which may take a very long time. Making cloning animals for diseases and making treatments for them effective. The next idea I will be talking about is reviving extinct and endangered species. As dangerous as it sounds, it can be very helpful for many people, even for your kids. An example would be that some animals out in the world are endangered such as giant pandas, gorillas, tigers, and dolphins. If nothing can be done to save these animals, the best way would be to clone them to build up their population. On the other hand, …show more content…

Cloning livestock is for producing more food for humans, a cloned cow can produce 2 times as much milk as a regular cow. Cloning livestock is also used for breeding, so that they can have more offspring which makes the babies be able to produce twice as much produce as regular livestock. Some people may have been confused and killed cloned animals in order to eat them, but that 's not what cloned livestock is for. Next I will talk about the advantages of cloning stem cells. Cloning stem cells can be to be helpful to many people later on in the future, it has the potential to cure cancer, types of STDs, and other diseases. In case you 're not familiar with stem cells, the purpose of them is to rebuild, and to repair the body. Stem cells can also be grown into whole organs if cloned. Making people who need a kidney or so, to be able to get