Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The cost of space exploration
How the space race benefited the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The cost of space exploration
How the space race benefited the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The cost of space exploration
Furthermore He continues in his speech with appreciation for those who were involved in the tragedy directly and President Reagan named them each individually, which conveys the high regard he had for the astronauts. His high respect for the astronauts carries over to the hope Reagan has for the space program. As Reagan continues his speech his plans for the space program are looking ahead to the future rather that holding on to the
Americans had high expectations of the space programs which intended to provide the United States a great sense of achievement. The significance of the space program lies in which symbolized American glory in science and technology. To pay tribute to the men and women who lost their lives. He explains that they will keep trying to send astronauts into space. Ethos - To quote Sr.
Later that night President Ronald Reagan came on air to give the State of the Union address and talk on the tragedy that had just unfolded. Through this speech President Reagan consoles the families of those who lost their lives, the American schoolchildren, and the American public as a whole. He also gives this speech to reassure America of the viability of the NASA program and the light in the future. By the use of rhetorical skill, including analogy, strong emotional appeals, and his position of power, President Reagan manages to convince America that despite the tragedy the benefits of keeping a space exploration program greatly outweigh the losses.
(Dennis 714) By giving the members of the space shuttle crew recognition as “pioneers”, the speech had a smooth transition from its nature as sincere eulogy into a rhetorical work with a deliberative occasion. As soon as audience received a message implying that Challenger was a beginning instead of an end and how discovery has its risk, Ronald Reagan was in a good position to elaborate his objectives on the space program. Considering its effectiveness, the transition between the bad news and the new hope is one of the greatest features of the speech. This transition is crucial to connect two parts of the speech that are equally important.
Reagan brings up the death of explorer Sir Francis Drake on the same day as the astronauts, and compares how if Drake died exploring a great frontier, so will the seven passengers on board Challenger. Stating how history will honor those who died on the mission appeals to the American audience. Despite the depression of failure, Reagan reminds America how failure does not diminish the space program, but how America will continue to follow the pioneers who led a nation. By remembering the “courage it took for the crew of the shuttle” and using the failure to inspire a continued effort to explore space, Reagan turns the tragedy into motivation and respect for explorers who confront
Nixon also appealed to logos by ensuring the people that America would not give up on space exploration because of the tragedy. Pathos was the most prominent appeal in the speech. Words of comfort and reassurance were used to pay respect to the astronauts and their families. Since Americans were reluctant and uncertain about supporting space exploration after the incident, Nixon reassured them The United States will persevere. By boosting morale, Nixon’s speech was
Now that the Space Race is over, what is the point? Are we wasting our money? Should we cut their budget? When the cold war ended with the soviets in 1991, it sparked up a debate as to whether or not the funding for the National Aeronautics and space administration should be continued. Although it may seem like a simple fix, it has proved to be one of NASA’s greatest and most difficult challenges yet.
On January 28th, 1986, Ronald Reagan, the president of the United States at the time, in his speech, entitled “Challenger Disaster,” addressed the Challenger Disaster. He supported this claim by first mourning over the tragedy, then he promoted NASA, also he tried to make sense of this calamity, and finally he informed the audience that the seven astronauts will never be forgotten and as a country we will be forever thankful for their service. Through Reagan’s use of tone, rhetorical analysis, and rhetorical tools he effectively persuaded America to mourn and appreciate the lives of the seven astronauts loss and to convince American people to continue their support for NASA and move forward as a country. Reagan unified America with his supportive
(Dennis 714) By giving the members of the space shuttle crew a recognition as “pioneers”, the speech was poised for a smooth transition from its nature as sincere eulogy into a rhetorical work with a deliberative occasion. As soon as audience received a message implying that Challenger was a beginning instead of an end and how discovery has its risk, Ronald Reagan was in a good position to elaborate his objectives on the space program. Surely, the transition between the bad news and the new hope is one of the greatest features of the speech.
By having the “more” repeated, Reagan expresses also that, despite this tragedy, the quest into space will not
He then explains, "'There will be more shuttle flights and more shuttle crews and, yes, more volunteers, more civilians, more teachers in space. Nothing ends here; our hopes and our journeys continue.' " this could tell the reader about how just because this event happened it will not stop them from making
“Don 't Gut NASA Space Missions” An assistant professor and NASA team mission overlooker, Janet Vertesi in her article “Don 't Gut NASA Space Missions” argues that cutting the funds of NASA means that they 'd have to make adjustments Dukes 4 or completely cancel some of their missions. She supports her claim by explaining how not only is the cut of money not only devastating for the scientists but for our economy. Next she continues to explain how the cut will ruin careers of some scientists.
This is essential so that the families of the astronauts feel as if they are surrounded and supported with comfort and understanding by the population.
I am always in the Marine Corps JROTC room and it just so happens that inside of there we have air rifles which I would use it to maneuver down the hall to the cafeteria. I would also make sure I bring a couple of kids with me so that we could bring some bins to the cafeteria. I would carefully and quietly enter the cafeteria, ensuring that I do not disturb any of those zombie cafeteria ladies. If I do, I will have my air rifle handy. I would swiftly make my way into the back where all of the food, snacks, and ice.
Former President of the United States, Ronald Reagan, in his address to the nation about the Challenger explosion, distinguishes the terrifying news of the explosion of the space shuttle. Reagan's purpose is to remember the lives lost in this painful accident and to ensure that space program will keep our faith with its future in space. He adopts a sorrowful tone in order to acknowledge all the courage and breakers that those seven astronauts expressed to his nation. Reagan opens his tribute to the Challenger astronauts by recognizing that this accident delayed his State of the Union address and by showing the pain of him and his wife’s grief. He appeal to the emotions of the listeners by expressing that “today is a day for mourning and remembering” (Reagan, 1986), that he and his wife are “pained to the core” (Reagan, 1986), and that we all know that this accident is “truly a national loss” (Reagan, 1986).