ipl-logo

Arguments Against The Expansion Of Medicaid

743 Words3 Pages

States are being pressured to expand Medicaid to families earning up to $30,000 a year, just like the Affordable Care Act permits. While several respected governors have agreed to expand the program, many other governors and state legislators are cautious. These officials do not want to deny Americans their access to health care, however they do want to slow the expansion of a program that will provide them with limited access to quality care while destroying state budgets. One of the strongest arguments that can be made against the expansion of Medicaid is the fact that States simply can not afford it. The appeal to states to expand Medicaid is that the federal government will cover 100% of the cost through 2016 and eventually lowering to …show more content…

A study in Health Affairs found that in 2011, nearly a third of physicians nationwide would not accept new Medicaid patients. This is because the Medicaid program typically pays doctors much less than private insurers. Nationally, for every dollar primary care received from someone with employer sponsored health insurance in 2008, Medicaid only paid 52 cents (“Why States Should Not Expand Medicaid”). During a town hall meeting House Speaker Paul Ryan said “The problem that we’re seeing in Medicaid is more and more doctors just won’t take Medicaid, because they lose money on …show more content…

In a recent series of polls done by Kaiser Family Foundation one question read as follows, “Would you say the current medicaid program is working well for most low-income people covered by the program, or not?” (10 charts, 2017). 61% of those questioned felt as if the program is running well for low-income Americans, while 26% believed the opposite.
Another question from the Kaiser poll was “Thinking about health priorities in the Federal Budget, do you want to see the president and congress increase spending, decreasing spending, or keep it about the same on medicaid?” (10 Charts, 2017). 47% of those that replied believed that the current medicaid budget should be kept as is, 40% said to increase spending, and only 12% wanted to decrease spending. The results of the Kaiser poll demonstrate how the public supports the way the program is being run and the distribution of

Show More
Related
1655 Words | 7 Pages

One of the author’s reasoning for how taking away ACA would affect Medicaid is back in 2016 legislation tried to step away from it, but former President Barack Obama repealed it because could eventually affect the lives of millions of people. The authors also cover how ACA changed Medicaid for the better, for example creating a program for just children’s coverage, inventing a new method to determine eligibility, and even creating new benefit options for families and small businesses. The author describes how the new Presidential administration can repeal or alter Medicaid through Section 1115. The authors main argument is that by repealing ACA would eliminate the Medicaid system which in turn will allow millions of people to be

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

The government of some opt out states are looking at alternative options to provide care for their large uninsured populations but this only leads to disparities in the health care options available to their denizens versus the other states (Omolola et.al). One proposal repeatedly made by the current administration is to limit the federal contribution by switching from the current percentage model to a model of block grants or per-capita caps. Under the block grants model, states would be given a fixed amount of Medicaid funding which they would need to manage. Under the per-capita model, Medicaid recipients will be subject to a reimbursement cap.

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

A requirement for people to maintain “continuous coverage”—to take an example supported by the new Secretary of Health and Human Services, Tom Price, and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan—would mean that people who lose their insurance temporarily, because they, say, change jobs or suffer a financial setback, would also lose their preëxisting-condition protections. For these people and for others left behind, Price and Ryan advocate state-run “high-risk pools.” But, in the thirty-five states that offered high-risk pools to the uninsurable before the A.C.A., inadequate funding delivered terrible coverage, with extremely high premiums and deductibles, and annual limits as low as seventy-five thousand dollars. Hardly anyone signed

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

The external environment around Obamacare consisted of the citizens of America as well as the politicians who represented them. Americans up to 2010 were not receiving the health care they so direly needed. A population recovering from recession in 2008 coupled with high medical costs, led to a concerning amount of Americans not getting the medical care they need. In 1999, 9% of the American population did not get the health care they needed because of cost; this number jumped to 15% in 2009. This problem was even more evident for the numerous Americans who were uninsured.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

Today, President Trump, like President Reagan, is interested in transferring government spending on Medicaid and giving block grants to the states to control their own Medicaid programs. Many people, even some Republicans, are worried that the states, without much government intervention will cut people from the services they are receiving currently. The politicians who are in disagreement with this proposal strongly favor a more centralized government and cling tight to the original meaning of

Read More
1437 Words | 6 Pages

In this paragraph i will talking about the political effects of the affordable care act, also how the republicans aren’t in favor of this, and how the democrats are in favor of this act on the political spectrum. Republicans think that people can be uninsured with no problem, and leaving insurers without billions of dollars in promised federal payments. After GOP control the republicans and the white house have damaged the affordable care act, but have fallen short of their goal of dismantling it. President Trump eliminated the bill that would restore the two years of payments that the law guarantees insurers, which was estimated at 8$ billion to reimburse them the discounts the affordable care act health plans must give lower-income customers for out of pocket expenses and deductibles. Also the House of Representatives opposed the bill that would provide about 10$ billion over the next two years to help states create high risk pools to cope with customers with high medical costs.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

“Obamacare is not about improved health care or cheaper insurance or better treatment or insuring the uninsured, and it never has been about that. It's about statism. It's about expanding the government. It's about control over the population. It is about everything but health care (“Rush Limbaugh Quote”).”

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

On the one hand, the expansion in coverage has paved the way for high quality and affordable healthcare for millions of Americans who could not afford the same. In Obamacare’s Ups And Downs, As Seen by a Republican Doctor, Francine Kiefer informs her readers that since the ACA, national statistics showed that a record low of “8.6 percent of people” did not have health insurance by the first quarter of 2016 (par.20). In South Tucson, Arizona, a “$5 million federal grant” to the El Rio Community Health Center set the foundations on which the people could access the same level of health care they could if they had access to private practices (Kiefer par.23). That is so despite the truth that most of the patients [60%] “live at or below the federal poverty line” (Kiefer par.23). On the contrary, and in an undeniable liability, there is the mandate that all persons ought to “carry health insurance” (Kleinke par.6).

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

Medicaid is another beast entirely, as Medicaid has been somewhat unsuccessful providing affordable healthcare for the poor as Medicare did for the elderly and disabled, while it still maintains a massive amount of fiscal spending. These failures, are mainly due to Medicare being set up as a Social Security program, while Medicaid established a program independent of Social Security. There have been a few pushes for reform of these acts, due to cost or not containing particular types of care, and some have happened, especially as of late with the introduction of the Affordable Care Act, though the there has been little success in comparison to its' sister, Medicare. Despite the shortcomings of the Amendments, such as the lack of coverage

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

In 2015, the average American visited the doctor four times a year, compared to an average of 3.3 visits in 1995 (“Health Care Use”). With this steady escalation of doctors visits among Americans, the need for an insurance plan that offers good coverage has also increased. The recently repealed Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, and the new Republican Party (GOP) replacement plan both contain pros and cons regarding taxing non-healthcare insurance buyers and the wealthy, how women’s health is covered, and how older Americans benefit from the plans. When looking closely at these policies brought to light by these two plans, a clear front runner has been determined. Obamacare benefits the widest range of Americans; from low income

Read More
190 Words | 1 Pages

Medicaid expansion is still somewhat confusing to me, however I do have an understanding of the requirements such as the income falling between 0-400 percent of the federal poverty level. I also understand that this has become an issue of disparities between states due to expansion. I am partial to each state being able to decide the best options for their citizens. As you stated Emily, I can see how the decision of the state such as whether to expand or not to expand can cause harm to the constituents. I disagree with the philosophy of covering “able-bodied” poor.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Medicaid has poor quality when it comes to patients. A receht study in Oregon concluded that patients with Medicaid did not achieve reasonable health benefits from their insurance company. Government ran programs has become worse throughout the yars and is expecting to run into many more, Medical personal are effected by Obama Care, as a result, we are experiencing shortages of doctors and doctors only taking cash. Many medical facilities are not accepting Obamacare nor did government t run programs because of

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

The United States has different and benefited successful welfare programs which have gained profits to the country and gained aid to the society. Medicare and Medicaid have been popular for a long time now and have kept U.S society well taken care of. In the 50 years since they were signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson, Medicare and Medicaid have grown into health insurances huge accomplishment, covering one-third of all Americans and accounting for $4 of every $10 spent on healthcare today. Widely supported by receivers, the programs have been severely successful on many fronts like Medicare has extended health insurance to nearly all the elderly, and Medicaid provides vital fetal and maternity care for almost half of U.S. births. Both programs have improved narrow the healthcare gap between rich and poor, and between whites and minorities providing further benefits to the groups.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

The law that was intended to improve the status quo of health care has, in essence, caused a dangerous paradigm shift in health care costs. Fundamentally, the Affordable Care Act is a failed attempt to reduce health care costs in the United States. The Act was designed to increase affordability of health insurance for extremely low-income families; nevertheless, the Act exponentially increased health insurance costs for the majority of Americans. In America, majority rules-- why should health care be an

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

Whereas more people are enrolling in Medicaid than Medicare, more executive orders of cutting Medicaid funds become common, while people who desperately need the assistance Medicaid gives them will become denied. Medicaid is a federal program that covers over 65 million people, those people being pregnant women, families and their children, the elderly, people with disabilities, and all people regardless of age who are near or under the federal poverty line. The largest group Medicaid covers is the elderly which are 10% of enrollees and ¼ of Medicaid spending. More than what Medicare, a federal health care program which only covers support block people of age 65 and over, spends. Federal law requires states to provide mandatory benefits

Read More

More about Arguments Against The Expansion Of Medicaid

Related Topics

Open Document