In 373 A.D. Ambrose served as the Governor of Milan, a city in northern Italy. When the existing bishop of Milan, died, the election of a new bishop ensued. Given the ongoing conflict regarding Arianism and Nicene Orthodoxy, Ambrose, as Governor, attended the election with the intent to keep the peace and avoid a riot. However, given his presence, the election soon became a referendum to elect Ambrose. He did not want nor did he seek this position. When his attempts to dissuade the crowd and not accept the position failed, Ambrose attempted to flee. Unsuccessful in his escape and given the emperor’s endorsement, Ambrose reluctantly agreed to be the next bishop of Milan.
As bishop, Ambrose faithfully devoted himself to the role and responsibilities of the position. Applying the same administrative skills that served him well as Governor, he quickly organized the clergy in the area. To this end, Ambrose’s “Duties of the Clergy” that provided guidance and direction to pastors long after his death. His influence is also clearly seen in the role as a pastor and mentor to Augustine of Hippo.
It was not unit well after his death that John of Constantinople became John Chrysostom. This title had been given to him posthumously as one of the great preachers of
…show more content…
This led to his banishment by Emperor Arcadius. During this exile, denied of his pulpit, the great orator took to the pen. His influence and notability continued to grow. After the death of Eudoxia, John’s continued banishment created political intrigue and a schism between the Western church in Rome and Eastern church in Constantinople. His continued notability via the pen and the injustice of his banishment soon led authorities to move his exile to a more distant location near the Black Sea. The strain of this exile severely impacted his heath, which led to John’s