The existence of good is not dependant on the mind of others but in your own mind. I believe it is impossible to associate something as being good without having some kind of objective. Good is defined differently through the minds of every human being. What is correctly good to some, may be different to others. This is shown in the principles of being, Aristotle’s meaning of a good life, and in Grisez, Finnis, and Boyle’s New Natural Law theory and how it relates to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics.
I believe society relates good to the seven virtues we practice. We relate good to what we already see within friendship, family and so on. How we reflect upon what we see, determines if we are good. This relates to Aristotle’s principle of being because we need to see things with understanding. According to the principle of practical reason, good will always be objective because there will
…show more content…
The new natural law theory claims that our views on what is good would be different if human nature were different. We do what we believe is good by reflecting on what we see on a daily basis. Aristotle’s book “Nicomachean Ethics” also helps to prove this theory. Aristotle believes virtue has to be practiced at a young age. He argues between the order of knowing and the order of being. This helps the argument on why you cannot use the term good without being objective because we all grow up in different environments. For example, if you grow up with a group of friends who always do good on a test because they cheat you find yourself thinking it is okay to cheat because the end result will benefit yourself. Plato believed for something to be good there had to be truth and beauty in it. Aristotle argued against this in “Nicomachean Ethics” because he believed this was irrelevant to ethics because good is related to ones actions and