The organization proposed the development of an alternative temporary shelter that hosted an average of four hundred and thirty-nine individuals per night (Darwin 6). The shelter would later resume with costs being shared among several stakeholders. The shelter was placed under new management that targeted two hundred and fifty individuals in an enclosed environment. The shelter also helps in describing the seriousness of homelessness challenge in Arizona State. The aspect of addressing chronic homelessness is a significant step towards improving the living standards of the affected individuals. The chronic homeless individuals are perceived as the most vulnerable and difficult community to serve. The population is described as living in streets for more years than any other homelessness individuals in the world. The population is also analyzed to utilize hospital and emergency room …show more content…
The shelters would help contain the large population of homeless individuals. The new shelters would have educational programs incorporated in order to ensure that individuals receiving shelter services are taught on survival and self-dependence skills. The shelters would also provide Arizonian’s with employment opportunities. The shelters would formulate policies on how to absorb homeless individuals from streets and maximum period that one should spend in the facilities. The formulation of policies should ensure that individuals acquire self-dependence and survival skills by end of the program. The mechanism would help ensure that in the future number of homeless individuals is reduced. In addition, state of Arizona should cooperate with the federal government in ensuring the facilities are set up to offer quality services. Therefore, cost of building and maintaining both state and federal governments would share the