ipl-logo

Arturo Escober Discourses Of Development

910 Words4 Pages

Escober attempts to aid the crises in developmental discourse, through two perspectives: the inability to critical thought, and to imagine a new domain which leaves behind the imaginary of development which continually dependent on western modernity and historicity, and secondly the emergence of a powerful social movement discourse. Additionally, Escober notes that the “ product of critical thought should be a history of our present, of those discourses and practices which have made us what we are, shaped, and what we think, determined what we see and feel”(Escober 22) as a result is must be invented and collectively practiced. Furthermore, Auturo Escobar notes that most of the existing critiques of development have reached a plateau, and …show more content…

Additionally, the critiques of development which he addresses, must be put side by side to the critiques of Postmodernity. A crucial criticism made to Post modernity, lies within notion that it is meaningless as it prevents facts or full detail of matter from being presented, therefore, it is vague. Arturo Escober falls into the trap of vagueness, as his primary concern of development lies within the existing types of discourse. He critically addresses modern discourses and their affect on developmental programs, yet he does not address the original target, of the problem of development which lies within capitalism. As development discourse is the product of the expansion of capitalism and globalization. Additionally, he considers discourse to be the sole element of any society which may be used a tool for transformation. He neglects the fact the society, is built on diverse power dynamics, and relationships among individuals, and their actions. Therefore, he does not question the existence of the projects/programs which may be implemented by grassroots movements. Structurally, Escober solely theorizes the notion of discourse and the role of social movements, and lacks in presenting relevant examples. Thus, further additional texts must be analyzed in attempt to understand Auturo Escober’s notion of

Open Document