ipl-logo

Ashcroft V Free Speech Coalition Summary

697 Words3 Pages

The “Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition” case was argued on October 30, 2001 by the Attorney General Ashcroft. It was a case to decide if the Child Pornography Protection Act of 1996 (CPPA) was constitutional or not (Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition). The CPPA prohibits “any visual depiction including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer-generated image or picture” that “is, or appears to be, a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct,” and any sexually explicit image that is “advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that convey the impression” it depicts “a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct” (Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition). “It took place at the United States Supreme Court …show more content…

Therefore, the lower courts’ decisions were reversed (Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition) (Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition). The following justices agreed with the CPPA: Justice Stevens, Justice Kennedy, Justice Souter, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer. There were three justices that disagreed with the CPPA: Justice O’Connor, Justice Rehnquist, and Justice Scalia (Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition). Justice O’Connor explained that the CPPA should not ban pornography using youthful-looking adults. Justice Rehnquist agrees and explains that the CPPA should not ban pornography it should have a limiting instruction so that only material which is not protected/prohibited should be ban/ punished (Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition). Justice Scalia also disagreed with the CPPA (Ashcroft v. Free Speech …show more content…

One case they used was Miller v. California. This case helped them because the Miller Standard was made after the decision of the Miller v. California case. Another case was New York v. Ferber. This case distinguished child pornography from other sexually explicit speech because of the State’s interest in protecting the children exploited by the production process (United States Supreme Court). During this case, the Constitution was interpreted as a living constitution. The “War of Words” article states “Not all cases are so hard to decide since some parts of the constitution are quite specific. But many of the Constitution’s key provisions- like “freedom of speech” are more abstract.” This explains that as our world changes the interpretation will change. In the case “Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition” the interpretation is one way but that could be different from today’s interpretation

Show More
Related
839 Words | 4 Pages

This supreme court decision expressed national power more than many. This decision showed how much more power the national government has then the states within the nation. It was in this ruling that they reminded the nation that the constitution is just meant to be a basic outline of general ideas that are easily understood by the public (Jones Martin). If I was the supreme court I feel that I would've made a very similar decision. Reason being is that the national government should have much more power of states controlling what is right and what isnt.

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

“Poehlman's erotic e-mails cannot provide proof of predisposition because nothing he says in them helps differentiate his state of mind prior to the government's intervention from that afterwards.” (Poehlman p.6) and “The only indication in the record of any preexisting interest in children is Poehlman's statement in the hotel room that he has ‘always looked at little girls’, hardly an indication that he was prone to engage in sexual relations with minors.” (Poehlman p.6). In the case of U.S. v. Poehlman, “it was the government who initiated contact or suggestions of impropriety” (Poehlman p.7). Whereas in State v. Heitman, “it was Heitman [that]

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

The issue was, “Should a principal restrict student speech at a public school event when that speech can reasonably be viewed as promoting illegal drug use?”, they said yes it’s conservative. Justice said that the 1st Amendment rights

Read More
1582 Words | 7 Pages

Nabozny v. Podlesny (1996) was a case heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit regarding the protection of a school student in Ashland, Wisconsin, who had been harassed and bullied by classmates because of his sexual orientation. The plaintiff in the case—Jamie Nabozny—sought damages from school officials for their failure to protect him from the bullying. A jury found that this failure violated Nabozny's constitutional rights and awarded him $962,000 in damages.[1][2] Contents [hide] 1 Background 2 The case 3 Reception and significance 4 References 5 External links Background[edit] Jamie Nabozny (born October 1975) went to the local public middle school in the small Wisconsin town of Ashland, where his parents

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

Packingham v. North Carolina The case of Packingham v. North Carolina revolves around the use of the first amendment. In this case Lester Gerard Packingham is accuse of breaking a North Carolina law that states “§ 14-202.5.- It is unlawful for a sex offender who is registered in accordance with Article 27A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes to access a commercial social networking Web site where the sex offender knows that the site permits minor children to become members or to create or maintain personal Web pages on the commercial social networking Web site.” (http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/statutes/statutelookup.pl?statute=14-202.5). The reason that Packingham is being charged with this crime is because of a 2010 face book status update

Read More
2663 Words | 11 Pages

Justice Antonin Scalia made no apologies for his legal philosophy of “originalism,” despite opposition from other justices and the public. Scalia believed that the United States Constitution should strictly be interpreted in terms of what the founding fathers had meant for it when the Constitution was written. Scalia’s critics contended that the Constitution is a “living document,” therefore, it should allow the courts to take into consideration evolving viewpoints of society. I. Antonin Scalia: A brief overview of his law career beginning in 1961.

Read More
1677 Words | 7 Pages

The law, however, is constantly based on notions of morality, and if all laws representing essentially moral choices are to be invalidated under the Due Process Clause, the courts will be very busy indeed,” (Bowers v. Hardwick). This case was decided by the justices who acted as curators of the Constitution, and the words contained within. The Constitution says nothing about there being a right to commit sodomy, and the mentalities of the Founding Fathers enforce this. These cases are very similar. Like Lawrence, the Amendment in issue was the 14th.

Read More
1195 Words | 5 Pages

In the text, “A Cheerleader’s Vulgar Message” the author, Adam Liptak, the Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, argues that the court case Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. The Supreme Court involving a 9th grade student in Pennsylvania that didn't make the varsity cheer squad and posted vulgar language with her friend on social media to show her frustration and getting punished for a whole year from cheer was a controversial topic and presents both sides. Liptak shows one side of the argument by stating, “The court said the First Amendment did not allow public schools to punish students for speech outside school grounds.” This helps to prove the author's claim that this was a controversial topic because he is stating what the court's response to the case was and that this is also improving his credibility because he uses the First Amendment to show why the court thinks the school was in the wrong for the students'

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

The statute defined contraceptives as obscene and illicit, making it a federal offense to disseminate birth control through the mail or across state lines.” (Anthony Comstock’s ‘Chastity’). During this time, Anthony wanted to censor the knowledge and access to obscene contraceptives and obscene writings. This was a “controversial law because it limited the reproductive right of women and violated every person’s right to privacy”(Seward). The censorship he put on women and society caused the government to gain more control over the people by limiting the information they knew.

Read More
346 Words | 2 Pages

Kara’s strongest argument was that adopting the resolution is a violation of the 1st Amendment, freedom of speech etc. She justified her argument by providing evidence that adopting the resolution is unconstitutional because it has not made it through the US Supreme Court, thus the government has little control on media violence. This went against Corissa’s argument that if the government can have control over children watching pornography then the same control should be implemented for children watching media violence. This is an example of an argument from principle because it appeals to values such as justice or equality (Herrick). Furthermore, I believe Corissa won the debate.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

This case highlights how important the Supreme Court is to setting legal precedent and preserving the states' and the federal

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Many people often use the first amendment to get away with committing horrible and despicable crimes. Although, I have never experienced up close or personal myself, but I have observed an abundance of news, movies and documentary television shows. Whereas, countless people have plead the first amendment to get away with cases such as child pornography, disturbing websites, and other horrible tends of self-expression or interest. Consequently, I consider that just like with other debates and argument of society’s concerns and problems, our amendments have their pros and cons. Hence, the constitutional amendments are frequently used in the court of law; equally can bend both ways.

Read More
255 Words | 2 Pages

In the 1915 case of Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, the Supreme Court observed that motion pictures do not constitute part of the “press” in the State of Ohio. For this reason, motion pictures were held not entitled to First Amendment protection from censorship. This case arose in response to the passing of a statute, whereby

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Fraser was a Supreme Court case in 1986 involving whether or not the First Amendment prevents schools from getting a high school student at an assembly in trouble for giving a speech that is offensive in any sexual way. At aa school, a student known as Matthew Fraser gave a speech to nominate one of the students that went to that school for elective office. As Fraser gave a speech, members of the audience felt that he was using graphically sexual metaphors. The school didn’t tolerate this so they prohibited his use of offensive language and suspended Fraser from school for two days.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

Everyone loves having the ability to voice their opinions without restrictions. This right is called Freedom of Speech, taking this away from Americans would be the equivalent to causing WWIII. People often use this right to defend themselves when stating opinions However, how long does it take before Freedom of Speech simply becomes Hate Speech? Written in 1789 the Bill of Rights contains about 27 Amendments, these were soon ratified down into the 10 Amendments we’re familiar with today. Amongst these amendments is the 1st amendment, which grants us some of our most important rights as humans.

Read More

More about Ashcroft V Free Speech Coalition Summary

Open Document