Assassination Of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Analysis

I listened to “The Night in Question 2015”. This episode discussed the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, and proposed the following question: “Even if the assassination is supported by facts, why are people choosing to deny it?”. I can’t relate to this episode, but I know of people that can. There are people around the world that deny the Holocaust. When I was reciting blessings in front of the Holocaust Memorial on Holocaust Remembrance Day, there were deniers who shouted out anti Israel slogans and protested against the Holocaust. I simply do not understand how one can deny something, even when facts are there supporting as evidence. I think it is a power struggle. People will choose to deny something may be scared because they do not want to off as weak, or powerless.

Each of these acts refers back to the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin. Within the Ira talks with producer Nancy Updike and reporter Dan Ephron interview the two

Assassinations are planned with thought, time management, patience and accuracy. Within Act 1, Yitzhak Rabin, the Prime Minister of Israel, is assassinated. This raises the question, “How does one get that urge to assassinate someone in the first place?”. One gets the urge to kill someone by staying strong to his or her beliefs and telling his or herself that his or her opinions are right, no matter what. In the morning after the assassination, the mother of the murder denies that her son killed the Prime Minister, proposing the following question: “If facts are supporting an attack, how can an individual deny that it occurred?” I think people deny the fact that certain things happen because they do not want to take responsibility for their actions. Each of these questions leads back to the original theme of accepting the truth and taking responsibility for your