ipl-logo

Atomic Bomb During Ww2 Essay

525 Words3 Pages

During World War II, the first atomic bomb used in warfare, had been dropped on Hiroshima by an American B-29 bomber, the 'Enola Gay'. On August 6, 1945, President Harry Truman tells the United States that an atomic weapon has been detonated in Japan. The atomic bomb had more than 20,000 tons of TNT, and more than two thousand times the blast power of the British "Grand Slam", the largest bomb ever yet used in the history of war. On August 15, 1945, Hirohito the emperor of Japan, made a broadcast over radio announcing surrender. Unfortunately, those that were lucky enough to survive the bombing, had many other problems. The bomb had caused fires, and had collapsed buildings, trapping many people. Many of those that were trapped ended up burning alive. Others had horrible burns that blackened their skin. The skin on their faces and the rest of their bodies were peeling off. Some even had eyeballs popped out of their sockets. These severe injuries traumatized the …show more content…

Although, I acknowledge it was a time of war where both sides harmed each other and done things seen as immoral. I do not think it was right because so many civilians had died. The bomb was partly dropped to show the world America’s power and use the people it was dropped on as test subjects for this new weapon. Though, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor first, I do not think the bombing is justified due to how much more horrific the death toll, and results of the A-bomb were. There is much speculation on what would happened if the bomb wasn’t dropped, and on any alternate methods President Truman had. If there was an invasion of Japan instead of the bombs dropping, it is estimated a million American soldiers would die, and many more Japanese. I think that no matter what happened people would have died, but no matter if the choice was right, or wrong, using nuclear weapons was just wrong even if it changed the path of history for better, or

Show More
Related
310 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

It stopped the fire raids, and the strangling blockade; it ended the ghastly specter of a clash of great land armies” (Doc 5). This quote from Henry Stimson explains how the fighting between Japan and America was like no other, the militaries were very powerful and that meant there would be more blood, and more death, and the use of the Atomic bomb was the least horrific outcome to the war. Secondly, the use of the atomic bomb saved many lives on both sides of the war, and that is another example of why Truman’s decision is justified. The reason President Truman’s decision is justified is because the bomb saved many lives on both sides of the war, even though there were innocent deaths, there would have been hundreds of thousands to even millions of deaths on each side of the war, so yes the decision is justified because it ended the chances of dying in war drastically. One piece of evidence from the pilot of the Enola Gay states “I am convinced that we saved more lives than we took.

Read More
109 Words | 1 Pages

I believe that the bombing of Japan was an over the top choice by the Americans. This way of bombing the Japanese was very inhumane, and left thousands dead. The A-bomb was extremely inhumane, there were a number of other options that the americans could have used, instead of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Some might think that the A-bomb saved america, but it destroyed Japan. They didn’t realize how much the A-bomb would affect the people and the whole country of Japan, the 20,000 kilojoule bomb killed 140,000 people within the months that followed.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Today, Many historians argue that America should not have dropped the bomb on Japan. People believe that is was morally incorrect for Americans to completely destroy two cities in Japan with many civilians. Even though dropping the atomic bombs was a violation of International Law, it was justified because it saved more lives than killed, it was the only way the Japanese would surrender and it made America more powerful. While the dropping of the bomb seems like it killed so many people, it actually saved more lives.

Read More
1573 Words | 7 Pages

WAS IT THE RIGHT CALL? The bombing of Japan against the united states was one of the world's worst historical attacks in history. The united states had dropped two nuclear bombs with the consent of Harry Truman who was the 33rd president of United states. On August 6, 1945, during World War II.

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

In Document 2, Admiral Leahy says, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.” Some Americans felt as though the weapon should not have been used because the Japanese were ready to give in. COME BACK Not only were the Japanese ready to surrender but it was morally wrong to bomb multiple cities without realizing what the outcomes may be.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

Again, the Japanese had no knowledge of the bombs, causing even more devastating casualties. People have argued over the years if the atomic bombing was justified or not, and multiple points can be made on both arguments, yet I take it that the bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified. Keep in

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

If the atomic bomb were not dropped the war would have lasted longer, ending in more lives lost and wasted materials. Another reason that dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified is, the Japanese had already done so much damage to the US with pearl harbor, They had it coming with damage done to them. “A Kamikaze Pilot's Manual” (Document #9) In the three pictures you can see the horrifying pearl harbor attack summed up in only 3 images, before, during, and the aftermath.

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

The Japanese were already on the verge of surrendering, so there was no point on dropping the bomb. Also, President Truman could have just shown an image or chart of the atomic bomb, rather than actually going through with the plan. These examples illustrate how the atomic bomb will always be a big controversy, but America was right for dropping the

Read More
1206 Words | 5 Pages

On the moral base, the answer would be no, of course, especially knowing the fact how Japan had no allies and that its navy was almost destroyed. Killing over 200,000 people, most of them civilians, will never be okay. But, when you look at the facts and weigh the possibility of what would have happened if Japan had dropped their bomb first, or if America tried an invasion with an enemy to whose soldiers’ honor was to die for the country, then this was the only possible decision to make in order for the U.S. to come out victorious. President Truman’s' decision to drop the Atomic bomb on Japan was the right decision for your country because it saved so many American lives. He was facing a terrible dilemma, but his priority was his people and their lives.

Read More
1599 Words | 7 Pages

Racial discrimination is inevitably seen throughout our history. Cuba had discriminated the Africans solely based on the colour of their skin. As there race dictated where they fit within the social hierarchy. Thus, allowing for the Cubans to enslave the Africans, however being slaves only made them fight harder as they never disregard their upbringing entailing their beliefs. Their strong beliefs and backgrounds ended up integrating within the Spaniards culture to form a hybrid, making them just as much apart of the Cuban culture as the spaniards were.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

According to an excerpt from Three Narratives of our Humanity, “It is hard to imagine that the Japanese would have surrendered without the atomic bomb”. The bomb was a necessary step in the war to defeat the ever growing Japanese military. Dropping a bomb seemed like the most efficient way to kill a large amount of the Japanese without having to but insert thousands of American soldiers into enemy territory. According to a World War II veteran, “The people who preferred invasion to A-bombing seemed to have no intention of proceeding to the Japanese fronts

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

There were 2 atomic bomb that was dropped in the World War II. The 2 atomic bombs is called The Fat Man and The Little Boy. Little boy was dropped on the city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. An American B-29 (a type of plane) called the "Enola Gay" was piloted by Paul W. Tibbets, dropped a uranium atomic bomb that is called The Little Boy, the bomber dropped the world’s first atomic bomb with its name Little Boy on Hiroshima, Hiroshima was Japan's seventh largest city. In minutes, half of the city was destroyed.

Read More

More about Atomic Bomb During Ww2 Essay

Related Topics

Open Document