ipl-logo

Atomic Bomb In WWII Ethical Dilemma

985 Words4 Pages

The Atomic Bomb in WWII
Unethical Dilemma
Leonardo McCormick
Adventist University of Health Sciences

The Atomic Bomb In WWII Unethical Dilemma
As all aspects of life-threatening situations can become an unethical dilemma which are then discussed. In order to make a statement we must always be mindful to set aside our personal bias when presenting such materials. That is when presenting to a group of people but in this paper I am asked to give my ethical thoughts on the questionable action of the first atomic bombs. The following review is based on the actual historical facts on the atomic bombs that were flown over Japan and dropped during World War II by the names of “Little Boy” and the second bomb was named “Fat Man”. During …show more content…

Four years later into the war the United States on August 6, 1945 dropped the world’s first arranged atomic bomb over Hiroshima in Japan. The explosion distributed through ninety percent of the city and instantly killed 80,000 people. Thousands of innocent lives would later die from radiation exposure. Without any hesitation three days later, the second bomb was released into Japan this time in Nagasaki, terminating roughly 40,000 people (Staff, History.com, 2015). This being said I would like to start off by saying that I think it is just incredibly terrible how far war can take a nation into the brink of having no other choice but leading into the manslaughter of thousands of people. I understand that war never is a pretty sight to see, it not only brings havoc to a society, culture, economy and so on but it tears families apart. There is nothing positive that comes with war especially when you have almost the entire earth battling amongst each other. That being said I do not believe it is right to decide amongst an oligarchy on whether to set a city, yet alone two cities, on fire and even worse to attempt annihilation of a country …show more content…

This was not taken into consideration before the action was sought out. The original intentions of the atomic bomb was for self-defense in fear of the Germans that one day they might use these WMD against anyone and that included the United States (Barnes, 2013). The United States could not possibly just stand by and watch the Germans have an atomic bomb and have the possibility of having an upper-hand on the Americans, anything but that. They had some random guy by the name of Albert Einstein help design the atomic bomb with fellow colleague Leo Szilard. This brings questions as to why use a creation for destruction when its original puposes were for defense only and what about the attached law to such weapons? One of the big unethical reasoning behind this disaster was something the United States is all too familiar with and that is this act might have been motivated through racism. I mean the math adds up all of Americas enemies were roughly stereotyped and crudely portraide through insulting propoganda. Also anti-Japanese racism in the American society targeted the Japanese one group of people, and established a hatred comparable with Nazi anti-Jewish propaganda. The Japanese were universally mocked as having enormous buck teeth, massive fangs

Show More
Related
1394 Words | 6 Pages

Name: Course Instructor: Class: Date: Critical Book Review: Prompt and Utter Destruction Introduction Within weeks, word on the US dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki began to spread that the main reason behind the bombs was to save the lives of Americans (Bernard). It was put that hundreds of thousands of American military causalities were saved through the bombings.

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

Why would killing so many people ever be justified? First off the Japanese were nearly done before the bombing , so the bomb wasn’t necessary. “The JApanese were already defeated and ready to surrender...” (Document 6). This quote shows that the bomb was not necessary and was just the United States showing off a new weapon they had.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Afterwards, the United States declared war on Japan, and joined allies against the axis powers. The United States’ use of the atomic bombs is justified because it saved American lives; Japan was given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S. The atomic bombs on Japan saved many American lives. Document 15 reads: The entire population of Japan is

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

On December 7th, 1941, the United states was attacked by the Japanese in the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor near Honolulu, Hawaii. The day after this devastating event, the Unites States congress and President Franklin D. Roosevelt, declared war against Japan. As Germany and Italy had allied with Japan, they also declared war on America. Two years later, the United States found themselves joining World War II. America had soon launched a way to get back at Japan for invasion of Pearl Harbor.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

Imagine that there is a decision to be made to launch the atomic bomb or not. The bomb was launched but was it justified? Years ago during WWll, a scientist Albert Einstein sent a letter to the president. It said that Germany was creating a bomb that would cause major destruction and the United States had to make one as well. Scientists started making the bomb and it became the Project Manhattan.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

World War II introduced the most dangerous weapon in the world, the atomic bomb. When the US used it on Japan we went to far and caused unnecessary damage to the people. Many people believe this to the only truth but, the real truth is that dropping the atomic bomb was a necessary evil we had to use in order to win the war in World War II and future wars to come. It save many american soldiers lives, stopped the Soviets from joining, and helped us win against Japan. First and foremost, World War II caused many casualties for both sides of the war.

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

the bomb’s code name was “Little Boy”. Three days later, on August 9th, 1945, America dropped another bomb on Nagasaki with the code name “Fat Man”. As many as 200,000 deaths were caused by “Little Boy” alone and many people would die of radiation for years to come. The dropping of the Atom bomb on Hiroshima is an extremely debatable issue with no right or wrong answer. In this essay I will describe both sides to the argument then conclude using my final opinion on whether I am for or against the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

The perception of human existence and its core aspects have never been the same after the developments during the twentieth century. Together with discoveries in physics and chemistry, the century has witnessed two world wars which led to millions of human deaths and other human atrocities. One of the miracles of the twentieth century was the creation of a nuclear weapon. The development of the nuclear weapons followed with further research on the hydrogen bomb as well as all the controversies surrounding the creation of the weapon. These controversies can be directly linked to some issues of moral and ethical significance.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

America’s War Crime From 1939-1945, or otherwise know as the duration of World War 2, an estimated 2,600,00-3,100,000 civilian and military casualties fell upon Japan as the years slowly dragged on. The two nuclear bombs, Fat Man and Little Boy, killed a combined total of 129,000-226,000, while the entire incendiary campaign only killed 300,000 and injured 400,000 more, and with those numbers the pure lethality of the nuclear bomb is clear. Since the United States Government knew about the radiation and its effects, the nuclear bombing of Japan in World War 2 can be defined as unjustified war crimes. The government can not legally own nuclear weapons under international law due to public safety.

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

As all the world has known, the biggest atomic bomb in warfare history by the end of World War 2 is the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima that hit on August 9th, 1945 by the direct order of our 33rd president of The United States Of America; Harry S. Truman. He thought this bomb would bring a close ending of the war (World War 2) and it definitely did but it was too much to handle afterwards when it hit. There was no choice for Truman because there was no other way to bring the war into a close. It was the last call, but they didn’t realize that after they released the bomb, it was hard to decide whether it was a mistake or the right decision. The bomb killed innocent people of 199,000 (plus more).

Read More

More about Atomic Bomb In WWII Ethical Dilemma

Related Topics

Open Document