ipl-logo

Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

844 Words4 Pages

In 1945, the United States launched an atomic bomb to Japan as an attempt to get Japan to surrender WWII. Firstly the United States dropped “Little Boy” in Hiroshima and later dropped “Fat Man” in Nagasaki. Although the intentions of these bombs was because of war, was it really necessary? This atomic bomb destroyed the lives of many Japanese through deaths, diseases and destruction. Isn’t the American moral strong enough to prevent this? President Trumans’s decision to launch the atomic bomb ended in the death of innocent people. These people died instantly and unexpectedly. According to “Icanw”, “By the end of 1945, the bombing had killed an estimated of 140,000 people in Hiroshima, and a further 74,000 in Nagasaki.” These people had families …show more content…

A specific deadly disease many of the Japanese exposed to the bomb experienced was leukemia, which was not shown until after around two years of radiation exposure. As stated in “K=1 Project”, “The Radiation Effects Research Foundation estimates the attributable risk of leukemia to be 46% for bomb victims.” Due to the launch of the atomic bomb, nuclear radiation caused people to be almost 50% more likely to get leukemia. Along with leukemia, many other illnesses were caused due to the atomic bomb. According to “Icanw”, “After about a decade, survivors began suffering from thyroid, breast, lung and other cancers at higher than normal rates.” The exposure to nuclear radiation caused victims to have a higher chance illness such as cancer, which is a deadly illness. The dropping of these atomic bombs had the negative effect of disease which is unjustifiable despite reasoning. Not only did the the atomic bombs cause death and disease, they as well caused major …show more content…

Many people lost their homes. According to “history.com”, “The plane dropped the bomb—-known as “Little Boy”…destroying five square miles of the city.” Five square miles is equivalent to more than 2 small towns, in which all buildings there were completely destroyed. The next bomb later dropped was known as “Fat Man”, according to “history.com”, “…”Fat Man” was dropped… More powerful than the one used at Hiroshima… The topography of Nagasaki, which was nestled in narrow valley between mountains, reduced the bomb’s effect, limiting the destruction to 2.6 square miles.” This atomic bomb did not do as much damage as the first bomb, “Little Boy”, yet would have done more destruction if it were not for the mountains in Nagasaki. The decision to drop these bombs was unjustifiable, through death, disease and destruction, yet some may

Show More
Related
642 Words | 3 Pages

More people died during the bombings than they would have if America invaded Japan. In Hiroshima and Nagasaki almost two-hundred thousand people were injured or killed. There are still people suffering the effects of the atomic bombs today. Many people that lived near the impact sites and survived have been entered into a radiation study.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

The doubts about the U.S. decision in 1945 have been discussed, analyzed, and there are still many controversies. In August 1945, the U.S. decided to use both of its two atomic bombs on Japan to end the war between them during WWII. The atomic bomb has killed about 200,000 people in the Japanese community and brought destruction to the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even though the bomb had terminated the war by Japan surrendering, there were many who were against the action of using the bomb. The reason behind that perspective is that many innocent people have died, and Japan was near surrendering, so there was no need for a major event.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.

Read More
1322 Words | 6 Pages

Women and children were killed, and entire cities were erased from existence. This clear lack of respect and ethical reasoning highlights that there were more negatives than benefits of the bombs. Document 8 says, “The record of General Macarthur’s operations from 1 March 1944 through 1 May 1945 shows 13,742 US killed compared to 310,165 Japanese killed.” These numbers support the fact that the number of Japanese casualties far exceeded that of America. The decision to drop the atomic bomb added to this total, and made the comparison between American and Japanese deaths even more striking.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

Although Harry S. Truman said that the bombs saved the Japanese from thousands of casualties, it caused even more, and especially worse suffering. In Hiroshima, the death toll was between 80,000 to 120,000 people. The Nagasaki bomb killed 35,000 to 74,000. Even after the bombing there were more people dying from radiation, scarcity of food, and overall horrible living conditions. John Hall on Daily Mail showed pictures of the aftermath of the bombings, and corpses lying in rubble, other people barely surviving.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

The effects of an atomic bomb are major. As shown in Document 7 displaying images of children and families saddened and injured after the attack, we can get a better sense of just how destructive the bomb was. Towns that were full of innocent children and women were destroyed along with the infrastructure and advancements that the city had made. The destruction caused by the atomic bomb was not justifiable as there were no soldiers there. Document 6 supports this when it says “ Hiroshima was no longer a city but a burned-over prairie.

Read More
1131 Words | 5 Pages

In their article, Document 4, Japan's largest and oldest English-language daily newspaper, Nippon Times, revealed that the United States had caused unnecessary deaths, basically going against an international war law. Nippon Times states in their article in 1945, “What meaning is there in any international law, in any rule of human conduct, in any concept of right and wrong, if the very foundations of morality are to be overthrown as the use of this instrument of total destruction threatens to do?¨ The essence of Nippon Times argument is that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is against the International War Laws that state the unnecessary suffering of people in a conflicted war. The United States, according to Japan, broke a law of war that should be respected and followed as it helps to maintain some humanity in armed conflicts, saving lives and reducing suffering. This example shows that the dropping of the atomic bomb wasn't a military necessity. Additionally in Document 4, Nippon Times responds by claiming “… if the very foundations of morality are to be overthrown as the use of this instrument of total destruction threatens to do?” which implies that the U.S. planned to threaten Japan to bomb them.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

Some of the survivors sustained radiation poison and severe burns. And the radioactive particles from the bomb would contaminate the water, soil, air, and food supply leaving years of environmental damage behind (International). The long-term ramifications of the atomic bomb prove that it is not comparable with the short-term effects of the bombing of Tokyo. The atomic bomb is so destructive that Karl does not believe that the United States should immediately surrender the technology to other countries. In fact, he encourages using the bomb to ensure peace among the nations.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

On a historic August day at the tail end of World War 2 a 20,000-ton force was dropped on two Japanese cities known as the atomic bomb and resulting in 160,000 causalities, substantial destruction, and an agreement to an unconditional surrender that ended the war. If the facts are properly presented it is very clear that there was no alternative to dropping the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima that could have come close to achieving the success it did for our country and the allied nations. Our leaders are intelligent and they knew the key to strong and successful future for our country was to be proactive and not think of only ending the war but demonstrating to the world that we are the force to be reckoned with and will not back down in the face of our adversaries. Our own valiant president Truman had a multitude of genius reasons for dropping that atomic bomb and I for one am going to support the brave decisions of our leaders and explain

Read More
418 Words | 2 Pages

Dropping this bomb caused thousands of innocent lives to be lost and even more so people to be injured but live. As said in the text,” it killed about 160000 people and 80% of the cities buildings…(nagasaki) the death toll there was less but still over 100000”. The problem was America was already kicking a horse that was down. Japan had already been almost defeated and the bomb was just a huge overkill. Even admiral Ernest King argued, “ if we had been willing to wait...

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

The blast wave resulting from the explosion caused windows within 10 miles to shatter and was felt up to 37 miles away from ground zero. The thermal pulse from the explosion ignited numerous fires in the city, incinerating all the buildings within 4.4 miles of ground zero. 30 minutes after the bomb exploded, a “black rain” containing highly radioactive particles that were sucked up into the air at the time of the explosion and during the fire started falling in areas northwest of Hiroshima, contaminating surrounding areas with radioactive particles. On August 9, 1945, at 11:02 a.m., the atomic bomb “Fat Man” was detonated above the city of Nagasaki. An implosion-type device with a core of

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

the bomb’s code name was “Little Boy”. Three days later, on August 9th, 1945, America dropped another bomb on Nagasaki with the code name “Fat Man”. As many as 200,000 deaths were caused by “Little Boy” alone and many people would die of radiation for years to come. The dropping of the Atom bomb on Hiroshima is an extremely debatable issue with no right or wrong answer. In this essay I will describe both sides to the argument then conclude using my final opinion on whether I am for or against the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima.

Read More
1336 Words | 6 Pages

It had a major effect on people during the time. Many lost their lives, but some also lost loved ones, family, and friends. Even those people that survived the bomb died later on in their life from different diseases and cancers caused by the radiation, or still suffer from radiation poisoning and can have mental and physical problems caused by it. These illnesses can be things like mental retardation. They can also be physical like some of their skin had burned off from the radiation.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

I think the United States should have not dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the atomic bombs was too expensive and it was not really worth it, they wiped out two entire cities, and Japan was planning on surrendering. The atomic bomb they used on Nagasaki cost 2 billion

Read More

More about Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

Related Topics

Open Document